Expression Cassettes For Root-Preferential Expression In Plants

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to expression cassettes comprising transcription regulating sequences with root-preferential or root-specific expression profiles in plants obtainable from  Arabidopsis thaliana  genes At1g66280, At1g74500, At1g49570, At1g70710, At5g66690, At3g29630, At5g48070, or At4g17800.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/285,701 filedNov. 22, 2005, which claims benefit of European application 04028202.2filed Nov. 27, 2004, European application 05002261.5, filed Feb. 3,2005, and European application 05002849.7, filed Feb. 11, 2005. Theentire content of each above-mentioned application is herebyincorporated by reference in entirety.

SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMISSION

The Sequence Listing associated with this application is filed inelectronic format via EFS-Web and hereby incorporated by reference intothe specification in its entirety. The name of the text file containingthe Sequence Listing is Sequence_Listing_(—)13173_(—)00029. The size ofthe text file is 173 KB, and the text file was created on Mar. 3, 2008.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to expression cassettes comprisingtranscription regulating sequences with root-preferential orroot-specific expression profiles in plants obtainable from Arabidopsisthaliana genes At1g66280, At1g74500, At1g49570, At1g70710, At5g66690,At3g29630, At5g48070, or At4g17800.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Manipulation of plants to alter and/or improve phenotypiccharacteristics (such as productivity or quality) requires theexpression of heterologous genes in plant tissues. Such geneticmanipulation relies on the availability of a means to drive and tocontrol gene expression as required. For example, genetic manipulationrelies on the availability and use of suitable promoters which areeffective in plants and which regulate gene expression so as to give thedesired effect(s) in the transgenic plant.

The root-preferential or root-specific promoters are useful foralteration of the function of root tissue, modification of growth rate,improvement of resistance to root preferred pathogens, pests, herbicidesor adverse weather conditions, for detoxification of soil as well as forbroadening the range of soils or environments in which said plant maygrow. Root abundant or root specific gene expression would provide amechanism according to which morphology and metabolism may be altered toimprove the yield and to produce useful proteins in greater amounts. Inparticular, root specific promoters may be useful for expressingdefense-related genes, including those conferring insectical resistanceand stress tolerance, e.g. salt, cold or drought tolerance, and genesfor altering nutrient uptake.

A limited number of examples of root preferred and root-specificpromoters have been described. These include the RB7 promoter fromNicotiana tabacum (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,459,252 and 5,750,386) the ARSKIpromoter from Arabidopsis thaliana (Hwang and Goodman (1995) Plant J.8:37:43), the MR7 promoter from Zea mays (U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,848), theZRP2 promoter of Zea mays (U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,363), and the MTLpromoter from Zea mays (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,466,785 and 6,018,099). Many ofthese examples disclose promoters with expression patterns confined to alimited number of root tissues. Other fail to provide the rootspecificity needed for expression of selected genes. It is advantageousto have the choice of a variety of different promoters so that the mostsuitable promoter may be selected for a particular gene, construct,cell, tissue, plant or environment. Moreover, the increasing interest incotransforming plants with multiple plant transcription units (PTU) andthe potential problems associated with using common regulatory sequencesfor these purposes merit having a variety of promoter sequencesavailable.

There is, therefore, a great need in the art for isolation andcharacterization of new root-specific or root-preferrentialtranscription regulating sequences which offer a broad spectrum ofbreadth, expression level and specificity of root cell-type expression,that can be used for expression of selected transgenes in economicallyimportant plants. It is thus an objective of the present invention toprovide new and alternative expression cassettes for root-preferentialor root specific expression of transgenes in plants. The objective issolved by the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, a first embodiment of the invention relates to a expressioncassette for root-specific or root-preferential transcription of anoperatively linked nucleic acid sequences in plants comprising

-   i) at least one transcription regulating nucleotide sequence of a    plant gene, said plant gene selected from the group of genes    described by the GenBank Arabidopsis thaliana genome loci At1g66280,    At1g74500, At1g49570, At1g70710, At5g66690, At3g29630, At5g48070, or    At4g17800, or a functional equivalent thereof, and functionally    linked thereto-   ii) at least one nucleic acid sequence which is heterologous in    relation to said promoter sequence.

Preferably, the transcription regulating nucleotide sequence is selectedfrom the group of sequences consisting of

-   i) the sequences described by SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10,    11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37,    40, 41, and 42,-   ii) a fragment of at least 50 consecutive bases of a sequence    under i) which has substantially the same promoter activity as the    corresponding transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described    by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21,    24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42;-   iii) a nucleotide sequence having substantial similarity to a    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO:    1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29,    30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42;-   iv) a nucleotide sequence capable of hybridizing to a transcription    regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4,    7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34,    35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42, or the complement thereof;-   v) a nucleotide sequence capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid    comprising 50 to 200 or more consecutive nucleotides of a    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO:    1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29,    30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, and 42, or the complement thereof;-   vi) a nucleotide sequence which is the complement or reverse    complement of any of the previously mentioned nucleotide sequences    under i) to v).

The functional equivalent of the transcription regulating nucleotidesequence is obtained or obtainable from plant genomic DNA from a geneencoding a polypeptide which has at least 70% amino acid sequenceidentity to a polypeptide selected from the group described by SEQ IDNO: 6, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 39, and 44, respectively.

The expression cassette may be employed for numerous expression purposessuch as for example expression of a protein, or expression of aantisense RNA, sense or double-stranded RNA. Preferably, expression ofthe nucleic acid sequence confers to the plant an agronomically valuabletrait.

Other embodiments of the invention relate to vectors comprising anexpression cassette of the invention, and transgenic host cell ornon-human organism comprising an expression cassette or a vector of theinvention. Preferably the organism is a plant.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method for identifyingand/or isolating a sequence with root-specific or root-preferentialtranscription regulating activity characterized that said identificationand/or isolation utilizes a nucleic acid sequence encoding a amino acidsequence as described by SEQ ID NO: 6, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 39, or 44 ora part of at least 15 bases thereof. Preferably the nucleic acidsequences is described by SEQ ID NO: 5, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, or 43 ora part of at least 15 bases thereof. More preferably, identificationand/or isolation is realized by a method selected from polymerase chainreaction, hybridization, and database screening.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method for providing atransgenic expression cassette for root-specific or root-preferentialexpression comprising the steps of:

-   I. isolating of a root-preferential or root-specific transcription    regulating nucleotide sequence utilizing at least one nucleic acid    sequence or a part thereof wherein said sequence is encoding a    polypeptide described by SEQ ID NO: 6, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 39, or    44, or a part of at least 15 bases thereof, and-   II. functionally linking said root-preferential or root-specific    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence to another nucleotide    sequence of interest, which is heterologous in relation to said    root-preferential or root-specific transcription regulating    nucleotide sequence.

DEFINITIONS

It is to be understood that this invention is not limited to theparticular methodology, protocols, cell lines, plant species or genera,constructs, and reagents described as such. It is also to be understoodthat the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describingparticular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope ofthe present invention which will be limited only by the appended claims.It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, thesingular forms “a,” “and,” and “the” include plural reference unless thecontext clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “avector” is a reference to one or more vectors and includes equivalentsthereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.

The term “about” is used herein to mean approximately, roughly, around,or in the region of. When the term “about” is used in conjunction with anumerical range, it modifies that range by extending the boundariesabove and below the numerical values set forth. In general, the term“about” is used herein to modify a numerical value above and below thestated value by a variance of 20 per-cent up or down (higher or lower).

As used herein, the word “or” means any one member of a particular listand also includes any combination of members of that list.

The term “gene” is used broadly to refer to any segment of nucleic acidassociated with a biological function. Thus, genes include codingsequences and/or the regulatory sequences required for their expression.For example, gene refers to a nucleic acid fragment that expresses mRNAor functional RNA, or encodes a specific protein, and which includesregulatory sequences. Genes also include non-expressed DNA segmentsthat, for example, form recognition sequences for other proteins. Genescan be obtained from a variety of sources, including cloning from asource of interest or synthesizing from known or predicted sequenceinformation, and may include sequences designed to have desiredparameters.

The term “native” or “wild type” gene refers to a gene that is presentin the genome of an untransformed cell, i.e., a cell not having a knownmutation.

A “marker gene” encodes a selectable or screenable trait.

The term “chimeric gene” refers to any gene that contains

-   1) DNA sequences, including regulatory and coding sequences, that    are not found together in nature, or-   2) sequences encoding parts of proteins not naturally adjoined, or-   3) parts of promoters that are not naturally adjoined.

Accordingly, a chimeric gene may comprise regulatory sequences andcoding sequences that are derived from different sources, or compriseregulatory sequences. and coding sequences derived from the same source,but arranged in a manner different from that found in nature.

A “transgene” refers to a gene that has been introduced into the genomeby trans-formation and is stably maintained. Transgenes may include, forexample, genes that are either heterologous or homologous to the genesof a particular plant to be transformed. Additionally, transgenes maycomprise native genes inserted into a non-native organism, or chimericgenes. The term “endogenous gene” refers to a native gene in its naturallocation in the genome of an organism. A “foreign” gene refers to a genenot normally found in the host organism but that is introduced by genetransfer.

An “oligonucleotide” corresponding to a nucleotide sequence of theinvention, e.g., for use in probing or amplification reactions, may beabout 30 or fewer nucleotides in length (e.g., 9, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21 or24, or any number between 9 and 30). Generally specific primers areupwards of 14 nucleotides in length. For optimum specificity and costeffectiveness, primers of 16 to 24 nucleotides in length may bepreferred. Those skilled in the art are well versed in the design ofprimers for use processes such as PCR. If required, probing can be donewith entire restriction fragments of the gene disclosed herein which maybe 100's or even 1000's of nucleotides in length.

The terms “protein,” “peptide” and “polypeptide” are usedinterchangeably herein.

The nucleotide sequences of the invention can be introduced into anyplant. The genes to be introduced can be conveniently used in expressioncassettes for introduction and expression in any plant of interest. Suchexpression cassettes will comprise the transcriptional initiation regionof the invention linked to a nucleotide sequence of interest. Preferredpromoters include constitutive, tissue-specific, developmental-specific,inducible and/or viral promoters. Such an expression cassette isprovided with a plurality of restriction sites for insertion of the geneof interest to be under the transcriptional regulation of the regulatoryregions. The expression cassette may additionally contain selectablemarker genes. The cassette will include in the 5′-3′ direction oftranscription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region, aDNA sequence of interest, and a transcriptional and translationaltermination region functional in plants. The termination region may benative with the transcriptional initiation region, may be native withthe DNA sequence of interest, or may be derived from another source.Convenient termination regions are available from the Ti-plasmid of A.tumefaciens, such, as the octopine synthase and nopaline synthasetermination regions (see also, Guerineau 1991; Proudfoot 1991; Sanfacon1991; Mogen 1990; Munroe 1990; Ballas 1989; Joshi 1987).

“Coding sequence” refers to a DNA or RNA sequence that codes for aspecific amino acid sequence and excludes the non-coding sequences. Itmay constitute an “uninterrupted coding sequence”, i.e., lacking anintron, such as in a cDNA or it may include one or more introns boundedby appropriate splice junctions. An “intron” is a sequence of RNA whichis contained in the primary transcript but which is removed throughcleavage and re-ligation of the RNA within the cell to create the maturemRNA that can be translated into a protein.

The terms “open reading frame” and “ORF” refer to the amino acidsequence encoded between translation initiation and termination codonsof a coding sequence. The terms “initiation codon” and “terminationcodon” refer to a unit of three adjacent nucleotides (‘codon’) in acoding sequence that specifies initiation and chain termination,respectively, of protein synthesis (mRNA translation).

A “functional RNA” refers to an antisense RNA, ribozyme, or other RNAthat is not translated.

The term “RNA transcript” refers to the product resulting from RNApolymerase catalyzed transcription of a DNA sequence. When the RNAtranscript is a perfect complementary copy of the DNA sequence, it isreferred to as the primary transcript or it may be a RNA sequencederived from posttranscriptional processing of the primary transcriptand is referred to as the mature RNA. “Messenger RNA” (mRNA) refers tothe RNA that is without introns and that can be translated into proteinby the cell. “cDNA” refers to a single- or a double-stranded DNA that iscomplementary to and derived from mRNA.

“Regulatory sequences” and “suitable regulatory sequences” and“transcription regulating nucleotide sequence” each refer to nucleotidesequences located upstream (5′ non-coding sequences), within, ordownstream (3′ non-coding sequences) of a coding sequence, and whichinfluence the transcription, RNA processing or stability, or translationof the associated coding sequence. Regulatory sequences includeenhancers, promoters, translation leader sequences, introns, andpolyadenylation signal sequences. They include natural and syntheticsequences as well as sequences which may be a combination of syntheticand natural sequences. As is noted above, the term “suitable regulatorysequences” is not limited to promoters.

“5′ non-coding sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence located 5′(upstream) to the coding sequence. It is present in the fully processedmRNA upstream of the initiation codon and may affect processing of theprimary transcript to mRNA, mRNA stability or translation efficiency(Turner 1995).

“3′ non-coding sequence” refers to nucleotide sequences located 3′(downstream) to a coding sequence and include polyadenylation signalsequences and other sequences encoding regulatory signals capable ofaffecting mRNA processing or gene expression. The polyadenylation signalis usually characterized by affecting the addition of polyadenylic acidtracts to the 3′ end of the mRNA precursor. The use of different 3′non-coding sequences is exemplified by Ingelbrecht et al., 1989.

The term “translation leader sequence” refers to that DNA sequenceportion of a gene between the promoter and coding sequence that istranscribed into RNA and is present in the fully processed mRNA upstream(5′) of the translation start codon. The translation leader sequence mayaffect processing of the primary transcript to mRNA, mRNA stability ortranslation efficiency.

“Signal peptide” refers to the amino terminal extension of apolypeptide, which is translated in conjunction with the polypeptideforming a precursor peptide and which is required for its entrance intothe secretory pathway. The term “signal sequence” refers to a nucleotidesequence that encodes the signal peptide.

“Promoter” refers to a nucleotide sequence, usually upstream (5′) to itscoding sequence, which controls the expression of the coding sequence byproviding the recognition for RNA polymerase and other factors requiredfor proper transcription. “Promoter” includes a minimal promoter that isa short DNA sequence comprised of a TATA box and other sequences thatserve to specify the site of transcription initiation, to whichregulatory elements are added for control of expression. “Promoter” alsorefers to a nucleotide sequence that includes a minimal promoter plusregulatory elements that is capable of controlling the expression of acoding sequence or functional RNA. This type of promoter sequenceconsists of proximal and more distal upstream elements, the latterelements often referred to as enhancers. Accordingly, an “enhancer” is aDNA sequence which can stimulate promoter activity and may be an innateelement of the promoter or a heterologous element inserted to enhancethe level or tissue specificity of a promoter. It is capable ofoperating in both orientations (normal or flipped), and is capable offunctioning even when moved either upstream or down-stream from thepromoter. Both enhancers and other upstream promoter elements bindsequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that mediate their effects.Promoters may be derived in their entirety from a native gene, or becomposed of different elements, derived from different promoters foundin nature, or even be comprised of synthetic DNA segments. A promotermay also contain DNA sequences that are involved in the binding ofprotein factors which control the effectiveness of transcriptioninitiation in response to physiological or developmental conditions.

The “initiation site” is the position surrounding the first nucleotidethat is part of the transcribed sequence, which is also defined asposition +1. With respect to this site all other sequences of the geneand its controlling regions are numbered. Downstream sequences (i.e.,further protein encoding sequences in the 3′ direction) are denominatedpositive, while upstream sequences (mostly of the controlling regions inthe 5′ direction) are denominated negative.

Promoter elements, particularly a TATA element, that are inactive orthat have greatly reduced promoter activity in the absence of upstreamactivation are referred to as “minimal or core promoters.” In thepresence of a suitable transcription factor, the minimal promoterfunctions to permit transcription. A “minimal or core promoter” thusconsists only of all basal elements needed for transcription initiation,e.g., a TATA box and/or an initiator.

“Constitutive expression” refers to expression using a constitutive orregulated promoter, “Conditional” and “regulated expression” refer toexpression controlled by a regulated promoter.

“Constitutive promoter” refers to a promoter that is able to express theopen reading frame (ORF) that it controls in all or nearly all of theplant tissues during all or nearly all developmental stages of theplant. Each of the transcription-activating elements do not exhibit anabsolute tissue-specificity, but mediate transcriptional activation inmost plant parts at a level of at least 1% of the level reached in thepart of the plant in which transcription is most active.

“Regulated promoter” refers to promoters that direct gene expression notconstitutively, but in a temporally- and/or spatially-regulated manner,and includes both tissue-specific and inducible promoters. It includesnatural and synthetic sequences as well as sequences which may be acombination of synthetic and natural sequences. Different promoters maydirect the expression of a gene in different tissues or cell types, orat different stages of development, or in response to differentenvironmental conditions. New promoters of various types useful in plantcells are constantly being discovered, numerous examples may be found inthe compilation by Okamuro et al. (1989). Typical regulated promotersuseful in plants include but are not limited to safener-induciblepromoters, promoters derived from the tetracycline-inducible system,promoters derived from salicylate-inducible systems, promoters derivedfrom alcohol-inducible systems, promoters derived fromglucocorticoid-inducible system, promoters derived frompathogen-inducible systems, and promoters derived fromecdysone-inducible systems.

“Tissue-specific promoter” refers to regulated promoters that are notexpressed in all plant cells but only in one or more cell types inspecific organs (such as leaves, roots, or seeds), specific tissues(such as embryo or cotyledon), or specific cell types (such as leafparenchyma or seed storage cells). These also include promoters that aretemporally regulated, such as in early or late embryogenesis, duringfruit ripening in developing seeds or fruit, in fully differentiatedleaf, or at the onset of senescence.

“Inducible promoter” refers to those regulated promoters that can beturned on in one or more cell types by an external stimulus, such as achemical, light, hormone, stress, or a pathogen.

“Operably-linked” or “functionally linked” refers preferably to theassociation of nucleic acid sequences on single nucleic acid fragment sothat the function of one is affected by the other. For example, aregulatory DNA sequence is said to be “operably linked to” or“associated with” a DNA sequence that codes for an RNA or a polypeptideif the two sequences are situated such that the regulatory DNA sequenceaffects expression of the coding DNA sequence (i.e., that the codingsequence or functional RNA is under the transcriptional control of thepromoter). Coding sequences can be operably-linked to regulatorysequences in sense or antisense orientation.

“Expression” refers to the transcription and/or translation of anendogenous gene, ORF or portion thereof, or a transgene in plants. Forexample, in the case of antisense constructs, expression may refer tothe transcription of the antisense DNA only. In addition, expressionrefers to the transcription and stable accumulation of sense (mRNA) orfunctional RNA. Expression may also refer to the production of protein.

“Specific expression” is the expression of gene products which islimited to one or a few plant tissues (spatial limitation) and/or to oneor a few plant developmental stages (temporal limitation). It isacknowledged that hardly a true specificity exists: promoters seem to bepreferably switch on in some tissues, while in other tissues there canbe no or only little activity. This phenomenon is known as leakyexpression. However, with specific expression in this invention is meantpreferable expression in one or a few plant tissues.

The “expression pattern” of a promoter (with or without enhancer) is thepattern of expression levels which shows where in the plant and in whatdevelopmental stage transcription is initiated by said promoter.Expression patterns of a set of promoters are said to be complementarywhen the expression pattern of one promoter shows little overlap withthe expression pattern of the other promoter. The level of expression ofa promoter can be determined by measuring the ‘steady state’concentration of a standard transcribed reporter mRNA. This measurementis indirect since the concentration of the reporter mRNA is dependentnot only on its synthesis rate, but also on the rate with which the mRNAis degraded. Therefore, the steady state level is the product ofsynthesis rates and degradation rates.

The rate of degradation can however be considered to proceed at a fixedrate when the transcribed sequences are identical, and thus this valuecan serve as a measure of synthesis rates. When promoters are comparedin this way techniques available to those skilled in the art arehybridization S1-RNAse analysis, northern blots and competitive RT-PCR.This list of techniques in no way represents all available techniques,but rather describes commonly used procedures used to analyzetranscription activity and expression levels of mRNA.

The analysis of transcription start points in practically all promotershas revealed that there is usually no single base at which transcriptionstarts, but rather a more or less clustered set of initiation sites,each of which accounts for some start points of the mRNA. Since thisdistribution varies from promoter to promoter the sequences of thereporter mRNA in each of the populations would differ from each other.Since each mRNA species is more or less prone to degradation, no singledegradation rate can be expected for different reporter mRNAs. It hasbeen shown for various eukaryotic promoter sequences that the sequencesurrounding the initiation site (‘initiator’) plays an important role indetermining the level of RNA expression directed by that specificpromoter. This includes also part of the transcribed sequences. Thedirect fusion of promoter to reporter sequences would therefore lead tosuboptimal levels of transcription.

A commonly used procedure to analyze expression patterns and levels isthrough determination of the ‘steady state’ level of proteinaccumulation in a cell. Commonly used candidates for the reporter gene,known to those skilled in the art are beta-glucuronidase (GUS),chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) and proteins with fluorescentproperties, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) from Aequoravictoria. In principle, however, many more proteins are suitable forthis purpose, provided the protein does not interfere with essentialplant functions. For quantification and determination of localization anumber of tools are suited. Detection systems can readily be created orare available which are based on, e.g., immunochemical, enzymatic,fluorescent detection and quantification. Protein levels can bedetermined in plant tissue extracts or in intact tissue using in situanalysis of protein expression.

Generally, individual transformed lines with one chimeric promoterreporter construct will vary in their levels of expression of thereporter gene. Also frequently observed is the phenomenon that suchtransformants do not express any detectable product (RNA or protein).The variability in expression is commonly ascribed to ‘positioneffects’, although the molecular mechanisms underlying this inactivityare usually not clear.

“Overexpression” refers to the level of expression in transgenic cellsor organisms that exceeds levels of expression in normal oruntransformed (non-transgenic) cells or organisms.

“Antisense inhibition” refers to the production of antisense RNAtranscripts capable of suppressing the expression of protein from anendogenous gene or a transgene.

“Gene silencing” refers to homology-dependent suppression of viralgenes, transgenes, or endogenous nuclear genes. Gene silencing may betranscriptional, when the suppression is due to decreased transcriptionof the affected genes, or post-transcriptional, when the suppression isdue to increased turnover (degradation) of RNA species homologous to theaffected genes (English 1996). Gene silencing includes virus-inducedgene silencing (Ruiz et al. 1998).

The terms “heterologous DNA sequence,” “exogenous DNA segment” or“heterologous nucleic acid,” as used herein, each refer to a sequencethat originates from a source foreign to the particular host cell or, iffrom the same source, is modified from its original form. Thus, aheterologous gene in a host cell includes a gene that is endogenous tothe particular host cell but has been modified through, for example, theuse of DNA shuffling. The terms also include non-naturally occurringmultiple copies of a naturally occurring DNA sequence. Thus, the termsrefer to a DNA segment that is foreign or heterologous to the cell, orhomologous to the cell but in a position within the host cell nucleicacid in which the element is not ordinarily found. Exogenous DNAsegments are expressed to yield exogenous polypeptides. A “homologous”DNA sequence is a DNA sequence that is naturally associated with a hostcell into which it is introduced.

“Homologous to” in the context of nucleotide sequence identity refers tothe similarity between the nucleotide sequence of two nucleic acidmolecules or between the amino acid sequences of two protein molecules.Estimates of such homology are provided by either DNA-DNA or DNA-RNAhybridization under conditions of stringency as is well understood bythose skilled in the art (as described in Haines and Higgins (eds.),Nucleic Acid Hybridization, IRL Press, Oxford, U.K.), or by thecomparison of sequence similarity between two nucleic acids or proteins.

The term “substantially similar” refers to nucleotide and amino acidsequences that represent functional and/or structural equivalents ofArabidopsis sequences disclosed herein.

In its broadest sense, the term “substantially similar” when used hereinwith respect to a nucleotide sequence means that the nucleotide sequenceis part of a gene which encodes a polypeptide having substantially thesame structure and function as a polypeptide encoded by a gene for thereference nucleotide sequence, e.g., the nucleotide sequence comprises apromoter from a gene that is the ortholog of the gene corresponding tothe reference nucleotide sequence, as well as promoter sequences thatare structurally related the promoter sequences particularly exemplifiedherein, i.e., the substantially similar promoter sequences hybridize tothe complement of the promoter sequences exemplified herein under highor very high stringency conditions. For example, altered nucleotidesequences which simply reflect the degeneracy of the genetic code butnonetheless encode amino acid sequences that are identical to aparticular amino acid sequence are substantially similar to theparticular sequences. The term “substantially similar” also includesnucleotide sequences wherein the sequence has been modified, forexample, to optimize expression in particular cells, as well asnucleotide sequences encoding a variant polypeptide having one or moreamino acid substitutions relative to the (unmodified) polypeptideencoded by the reference sequence, which substitution(s) does not alterthe activity of the variant polypeptide relative to the unmodifiedpolypeptide.

In its broadest sense, the term “substantially similar” when used hereinwith respect to polypeptide means that the polypeptide has substantiallythe same structure and function as the reference polypeptide. Inaddition, amino acid sequences that are substantially similar to aparticular sequence are those wherein overall amino acid identity is atleast 65% or greater to the instant sequences. Modifications that resultin equivalent nucleotide or amino acid sequences are well within theroutine skill in the art. The percentage of amino acid sequence identitybetween the substantially similar and the reference polypeptide is atleast 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, e.g., 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%,77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, andeven 90% or more, e.g., 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, up to atleast 99%, wherein the reference polypeptide is an Arabidopsispolypeptide encoded by a gene with a promoter having any one of SEQ IDNO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29,30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42, a nucleotide sequence comprisingan open reading frame having any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5, 12, 17, 22, 27,32, 38, or 43, which encodes one of SEQ ID Nos: 6, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33,39, or 44. One indication that two polypeptides are substantiallysimilar to each other, besides having substantially the same function,is that an agent, e.g., an antibody, which specifically binds to one ofthe polypeptides, specifically binds to the other.

Sequence comparisons maybe carried out using a Smith-Waterman sequencealignment algorithm (see e.g., Waterman, 1995). The localS program,version 1.16, is preferably used with following parameters: match: 1,mismatch penalty: 0.33, open-gap penalty: 2, extended-gap penalty: 2.

Moreover, a nucleotide sequence that is “substantially similar” to areference nucleotide sequence is said to be “equivalent” to thereference nucleotide sequence. The skilled artisan recognizes thatequivalent nucleotide sequences encompassed by this invention can alsobe defined by their ability to hybridize, under low, moderate and/orstringent conditions (e.g., 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS, 65° C.), with thenucleotide sequences that are within the literal scope of the instantclaims.

What is meant by “substantially the same activity” when used inreference to a polynucleotide or polypeptide fragment is that thefragment has at least 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, e.g., 71%, 72%, 73%,74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%,88%, 89%, and even 90% or more, e.g., 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%,98%, up to at least 99% of the activity of the full lengthpolynucleotide or full length polypeptide.

“Target gene” refers to a gene on the replicon that expresses thedesired target coding sequence, functional RNA, or protein. The targetgene is not essential for replicon replication. Additionally, targetgenes may comprise native non-viral genes inserted into a non-nativeorganism, or chimeric genes, and will be under the control of suitableregulatory sequences. Thus, the regulatory sequences in the target genemay come from any source, including the virus. Target genes may includecoding sequences that are either heterologous or homologous to the genesof a particular plant to be transformed. However, target genes do notinclude native viral genes. Typical target genes include, but are notlimited to genes encoding a structural protein, a seed storage protein,a protein that conveys herbicide resistance, and a protein that conveysinsect resistance. Proteins encoded by target genes are known as“foreign proteins”. The expression of a target gene in a plant willtypically produce an altered plant trait.

The term “altered plant trait” means any phenotypic or genotypic changein a trans-genic plant relative to the wild-type or non-transgenic planthost.

“Replication gene” refers to a gene encoding a viral replicationprotein. In addition to the ORF of the replication protein, thereplication gene may also contain other overlapping or non-overlappingORF(s), as are found in viral sequences in nature. While not essentialfor replication, these additional ORFs may enhance replication and/orviral DNA accumulation. Examples of such additional ORFs are AC3 and AL3in ACMV and TGMV geminiviruses, respectively.

“Chimeric trans-acting replication gene” refers either to a replicationgene in which the coding sequence of a replication protein is under thecontrol of a regulated plant promoter other than that in the nativeviral replication gene, or a modified native viral replication gene, forexample, in which a site specific sequence(s) is inserted in the 5′transcribed but untranslated region. Such chimeric genes also includeinsertion of the known sites of replication protein binding between thepromoter and the transcription start site that attenuate transcriptionof viral replication protein gene.

“Chromosomally-integrated” refers to the integration of a foreign geneor DNA construct into the host DNA by covalent bonds. Where genes arenot “chromosomally integrated” they may be “transiently expressed.”Transient expression of a gene refers to the expression of a gene thatis not integrated into the host chromosome but functions independently,either as part of an autonomously replicating plasmid or expressioncassette, for example, or as part of another biological system such as avirus.

The term “transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acidfragment into the genome of a host cell, resulting in genetically stableinheritance. Host cells containing the transformed nucleic acidfragments are referred to as “transgenic” cells, and organismscomprising transgenic cells are referred to as “transgenic organisms”.Examples of methods of transformation of plants and plant cells includeAgrobacterium-mediated transformation (De Blaere 1987) and particlebombardment technology (U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050). Whole plants may beregenerated from transgenic cells by methods well known to the skilledartisan (see, for example, Fromm 1990).

“Transformed,” “transgenic,” and “recombinant” refer to a host organismsuch as a bacterium or a plant into which a heterologous nucleic acidmolecule has been introduced. The nucleic acid molecule can be stablyintegrated into the genome generally known in the art and are disclosed(Sambrook 1989; Innis 1995; Gelfand 1995; Innis & Gelfand 1999. Knownmethods of PCR include, but are not limited to, methods using pairedprimers, nested primers, single specific primers, degenerate primers,gene-specific primers, vector-specific primers, partially mismatchedprimers, and the like. For example, “transformed,” “transformant,” and“transgenic” plants or calli have been through the transformationprocess and contain a foreign gene integrated into their chromosome. Theterm “untransformed” refers to normal plants that have not been throughthe transformation process.

“Transiently transformed” refers to cells in which transgenes andforeign DNA have been introduced (for example, by such methods asAgrobacterium-mediated transformation or biolistic bombardment), but notselected for stable maintenance.

“Stably transformed” refers to cells that have been selected andregenerated on a selection media following transformation.

“Transient expression” refers to expression in cells in which a virus ora transgene is introduced by viral infection or by such methods asAgrobacterium-mediated transformation, electroporation, or biolisticbombardment, but not selected for its stable maintenance.

“Genetically stable” and “heritable” refer to chromosomally-integratedgenetic elements that are stably maintained in the plant and stablyinherited by progeny through successive generations.

“Primary transformant” and “T0 generation” refer to transgenic plantsthat are of the same genetic generation as the tissue which wasinitially transformed (i.e., not having gone through meiosis andfertilization since transformation).

“Secondary transformants” and the “T1, T2, T3, etc. generations” referto transgenic plants derived from primary transformants through one ormore meiotic and fertilization cycles. They may be derived byself-fertilization of primary or secondary transformants or crosses ofprimary or secondary transformants with other transformed oruntransformed plants.

“Wild-type” refers to a virus or organism found in nature without anyknown mutation.

“Genome” refers to the complete genetic material of an organism.

The term “nucleic acid” refers to deoxyribonucleotides orribonucleotides and polymers thereof in either single- ordouble-stranded form, composed of monomers (nucleotides) containing asugar, phosphate and a base which is either a purine or pyrimidine.Unless specifically limited, the term encompasses nucleic acidscontaining known analogs of natural nucleotides which have similarbinding properties as the reference nucleic acid and are metabolized ina manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides. Unless otherwiseindicated, a particular nucleic acid sequence also implicitlyencompasses conservatively modified variants thereof (e.g., degeneratecodon substitutions) and complementary sequences as well as the sequenceexplicitly indicated. Specifically, degenerate codon substitutions maybe achieved by generating sequences in which the third position of oneor more selected (or all) codons is substituted with mixed-base and/ordeoxyinosine residues (Batzer 1991; Ohtsuka 1985; Rossolini 1994). A“nucleic acid fragment” is a fraction of a given nucleic acid molecule.In higher plants, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is the genetic materialwhile ribonucleic acid (RNA) is involved in the transfer of informationcontained within DNA into proteins. The term “nucleotide sequence”refers to a polymer of DNA or RNA which can be single- ordouble-stranded, optionally containing synthetic, non-natural or alterednucleotide bases capable of incorporation into DNA or RNA polymers. Theterms “nucleic acid” or “nucleic acid sequence” may also be usedinterchangeably with gene, cDNA, DNA and RNA encoded by a gene.

The invention encompasses isolated or substantially purified nucleicacid or protein compositions. In the context of the present invention,an “isolated” or “purified” DNA molecule or an “isolated” or “purified”polypeptide is a DNA molecule or polypeptide that, by the hand of man,exists apart from its native environment and is therefore not a productof nature. An isolated DNA molecule or polypeptide may exist in apurified form or may exist in a non-native environment such as, forexample, a transgenic host cell. For example, an “isolated” or“purified” nucleic acid molecule or protein, or biologically activeportion thereof, is substantially free of other cellular material, orculture medium when produced by recombinant techniques, or substantiallyfree of chemical precursors or other chemicals when chemicallysynthesized. Preferably, an “isolated” nucleic acid is free of sequences(preferably protein encoding sequences) that naturally flank the nucleicacid (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the nucleic acid)in the genomic DNA of the organism from which the nucleic acid isderived. For example, in various embodiments, the isolated nucleic acidmolecule can contain less than about 5 kb, 4 kb, 3 kb, 2 kb, 1 kb, 0.5kb, or 0.1 kb of nucleotide sequences that naturally flank the nucleicacid molecule in genomic DNA of the cell from which the nucleic acid isderived. A protein that is substantially free of cellular materialincludes preparations of protein or polypeptide having less than about30%, 20%, 10%, 5%, (by dry weight) of contaminating protein. When theprotein of the invention, or biologically active portion thereof, isrecombinantly produced, preferably culture medium represents less thanabout 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5% (by dry weight) of chemical precursors ornon-protein of interest chemicals.

The nucleotide sequences of the invention include both the naturallyoccurring sequences as well as mutant (variant) forms. Such variantswill continue to possess the desired activity, i.e., either promoteractivity or the activity of the product encoded by the open readingframe of the non-variant nucleotide sequence.

Thus, by “variants” is intended substantially similar sequences. Fornucleotide sequences comprising an open reading frame, variants includethose sequences that, because of the degeneracy of the genetic code,encode the identical amino acid sequence of the native protein.Naturally occurring allelic variants such as these can be identifiedwith the use of well-known molecular biology techniques, as, forexample, with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridizationtechniques. Variant nucleotide sequences also include syntheticallyderived nucleotide sequences, such as those generated, for example, byusing site-directed mutagenesis and for open reading frames, encode thenative protein, as well as those that encode a polypeptide having aminoacid substitutions relative to the native protein. Generally, nucleotidesequence variants of the invention will have at least 40, 50, 60, to70%, e.g., preferably 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, to 79%,generally at least 80%, e.g., 81%-84%, at least 85%, e.g., 86%, 87%,88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, to 98% and 99%nucleotide sequence identity to the native (wild type or endogenous)nucleotide sequence.

“Conservatively modified variations” of a particular nucleic acidsequence refers to those nucleic acid sequences that encode identical oressentially identical amino acid sequences, or where the nucleic acidsequence does not encode an amino acid sequence, to essentiallyidentical sequences. Because of the degeneracy of the genetic code, alarge number of functionally identical nucleic acids encode any givenpolypeptide. For instance the codons CGT, CGC, CGA, CGG, AGA, and AGOall encode the amino acid arginine. Thus, at every position where anarginine is specified by a codon, the codon can be altered to any of thecorresponding codons described without altering the encoded protein.Such nucleic acid variations are “silent variations” which are onespecies of “conservatively modified variations.” Every nucleic acidsequence described herein which encodes a polypeptide also describesevery possible silent variation, except where otherwise noted. One ofskill will recognize that each codon in a nucleic acid (except ATG,which is ordinarily the only codon for methionine) can be modified toyield a functionally identical molecule by standard techniques.Accordingly, each “silent variation” of a nucleic acid which encodes apolypeptide is implicit in each described sequence.

The nucleic acid molecules of the invention can be “optimized” forenhanced expression in plants of interest (see, for example, WO91/16432; Perlak 1991; Murray 1989). In this manner, the open readingframes in genes or gene fragments can be synthesized utilizingplant-preferred codons (see, for example, Campbell & Gowri, 1990 for adiscussion of host-preferred codon usage). Thus, the nucleotidesequences can be optimized for expression in any plant. It is recognizedthat all or any part of the gene sequence may be optimized or synthetic.That is, synthetic or partially optimized sequences may also be used.Variant nucleotide sequences and proteins also encompass, sequences andprotein derived from a mutagenic and recombinogenic procedure such asDNA shuffling. With such a procedure, one or more different codingsequences can be manipulated to create a new polypeptide possessing thedesired properties. In this manner, libraries of recombinantpolynucleotides are generated from a population of related sequencepolynucleotides comprising sequence regions that have substantialsequence identity and can be homologously recombined in vitro or invivo. Strategies for such DNA shuffling are known in the art (see, forexample, Stemmer 1994; Stemmer 1994; Crameri 1997; Moore 1997; Zhang1997; Crameri 1998; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,793 and 5,837,458).

By “variant” polypeptide is intended a polypeptide derived from thenative protein by deletion (so-called truncation) or addition of one ormore amino acids to the N-terminal and/or C-terminal end of the nativeprotein; deletion or addition of one or more amino acids at one or moresites in the native protein; or substitution of one or more amino acidsat one or more sites in the native protein. Such variants may resultfrom, for example, genetic polymorphism or from human manipulation.Methods for such manipulations are generally known in the art.

Thus, the polypeptides may be altered in various ways including aminoacid substitutions, deletions, truncations, and insertions. Methods forsuch manipulations are generally known in the art. For example, aminoacid sequence variants of the polypeptides can be pre-pared by mutationsin the DNA. Methods for mutagenesis and nucleotide sequence alterationsare well known in the art (see, for example, Kunkel 1985; Kunkel 1987;U.S. Pat. No. 4,873,192; Walker & Gaastra, 1983 and the references citedtherein). Guidance as to appropriate amino acid substitutions that donot affect biological activity of the protein of interest may be foundin the model of Dayhoff et al. (1978). Conservative substitutions, suchas exchanging one amino acid with another having similar properties, arepreferred.

Individual substitutions deletions or additions that alter, add ordelete a single amino acid or a small percentage of amino acids(typically less than 5%, more typically less than 1%) in an encodedsequence are “conservatively modified variations,” where the alterationsresult in the substitution of an amino acid with a chemically similaramino acid. Conservative substitution tables providing functionallysimilar amino acids are well known in the art. The following five groupseach contain amino acids that are conservative substitutions for oneanother: Aliphatic: Glycine (G), Alanine (A), Valine (V), Leucine (L),Isoleucine (I); Aromatic: Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y), Tryptophan(W); Sulfur-containing: Methionine (M), Cysteine (C); Basic: Arginine I,Lysine (K), Histidine (H); Acidic. Aspartic acid (D), Glutamic acid (E),Asparagine (N), Glutamine (Q). See also, Creighton, 1984. In addition,individual substitutions, deletions or additions which alter, add ordelete a single amino acid or a small percentage of amino acids in anencoded sequence are also “conservatively modified variations.”

“Expression cassette” as used herein means a DNA sequence capable ofdirecting expression of a particular nucleotide sequence in anappropriate host cell, comprising a promoter operably linked to thenucleotide sequence of interest which is operably linked to terminationsignals. It also typically comprises sequences required for propertranslation of the nucleotide sequence. The coding region usually codesfor a protein of interest but may also code for a functional RNA ofinterest, for example antisense RNA or a nontranslated RNA, in the senseor antisense direction. The expression cassette comprising thenucleotide sequence of interest may be chimeric, meaning that at leastone of its components is heterologous with respect to at least one ofits other components. The expression cassette may also be one which isnaturally occurring but has been obtained in a recombinant form usefulfor heterologous expression. The expression of the nucleotide sequencein the expression cassette may be under the control of a constitutivepromoter or of an inducible promoter which initiates transcription onlywhen the host cell is exposed to some particular external stimulus. Inthe case of a multicellular organism, the promoter can also be specificto a particular tissue or organ or stage of development.

“Vector” is defined to include, inter alia, any plasmid, cosmid, phageor Agrobacterium binary vector in double or single stranded linear orcircular form which may or may not be self transmissible or mobilizable,and which can transform prokaryotic or eukaryotic host either byintegration into the cellular genome or exist extrachromosomally (e.g.autonomous replicating plasmid with an origin of replication).

Specifically included are shuttle vectors by which is meant a DNAvehicle capable, naturally or by design, of replication in two differenthost organisms, which may be selected from actinomycetes and relatedspecies, bacteria and eukaryotic (e.g. higher plant, mammalian, yeast orfungal cells).

Preferably the nucleic acid in the vector is under the control of, andoperably linked to, an appropriate promoter or other regulatory elementsfor transcription in a host cell such as a microbial, e.g. bacterial, orplant cell. The vector may be a bi-functional expression vector whichfunctions in multiple hosts. In the case of genomic DNA, this maycontain its own promoter or other regulatory elements and in the case ofcDNA this may be under the control of an appropriate promoter or otherregulatory elements for expression in the host cell.

“Cloning vectors” typically contain one or a small number of restrictionendonuclease recognition sites at which foreign DNA sequences can beinserted in a determinable fashion without loss of essential biologicalfunction of the vector, as well as a marker gene that is suitable foruse in the identification and selection of cells transformed with thecloning vector. Marker genes typically include genes that providetetracycline resistance, hygromycin resistance or ampicillin resistance.

A “transgenic plant” is a plant having one or more plant cells thatcontain an expression vector.

“Plant tissue” includes differentiated and undifferentiated tissues orplants, including but not limited to roots, stems, shoots, leaves,pollen, seeds, tumor tissue and various forms of cells and culture suchas single cells, protoplast, embryos, and callus tissue. The planttissue may be in plants or in organ, tissue or cell culture.

The following terms are used to describe the sequence relationshipsbetween two or more nucleic acids or polynucleotides: (a) “referencesequence”, (b) “comparison window”, (c) “sequence identity”, (d)“percentage of sequence identity”, and (e) “substantial identity”.

-   (a) As used herein, “reference sequence” is a defined sequence used    as a basis for sequence comparison. A reference sequence may be a    subset or the entirety of a specified sequence; for example, as a    segment of a full length cDNA or gene sequence, or the complete cDNA    or gene sequence.-   (b) As used herein, “comparison window” makes reference to a    contiguous and specified segment of a polynucleotide sequence,    wherein the polynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may    comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) compared to the    reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions)    for optimal alignment of the two sequences. Generally, the    comparison window is at least 20 contiguous nucleotides in length,    and optionally can be 30, 40, 50, 100, or longer. Those of skill in    the art understand that to avoid a high similarity to a reference    sequence due to inclusion of gaps in the polynucleotide sequence a    gap penalty is typically introduced and is subtracted from the    number of matches.    -   Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well known        in the art. Thus, the determination of percent identity between        any two sequences can be accomplished using a mathematical        algorithm. Preferred, non-limiting examples of such mathematical        algorithms are the algorithm of Myers and Miller, 1988; the        local homology algorithm of Smith et al. 1981; the homology        alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch 1970; the        search-for-similarity-method of Pearson and Lipman 1988; the        algorithm of Karlin and Altschul, 1990, modified as in Karlin        and Altschul, 1993.    -   Computer implementations of these mathematical algorithms can be        utilized for comparison of sequences to determine sequence        identity. Such implementations include, but are not limited to:        CLUSTAL in the PC/Gene program (available from Intelligenetics,        Mountain View, Calif.); the ALIGN program (Version 2.0) and GAP,        BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics        Software Package, Version 8 (available from Genetics Computer        Group (GCG), 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wis., USA). Alignments        using these programs can be performed using the default        parameters. The CLUSTAL program is well described (Higgins 1988,        1989; Corpet 1988; Huang 1992; Pearson 1994). The ALIGN program        is based on the algorithm of Myers and Miller, supra. The BLAST        programs of Altschul et al., 1990, are based on the algorithm of        Karlin and Altschul supra.    -   Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available        through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This        algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs        (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query        sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued        threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in        a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word        score threshold (Altschul 1990). These initial neighborhood word        hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs        containing them. The word hits are then extended in both        directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative        alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are        calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M        (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N        (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino        acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the        cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction        are halted when the cumulative alignment score falls off by the        quantity X from its maximum achieved value, the cumulative score        goes to zero or below due to the accumulation of one or more        negative-scoring residue alignments, or the end of either        sequence is reached.    -   In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST        algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity        between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul (1993). One        measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the        smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of        the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino        acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a test        nucleic acid sequence is considered similar to a reference        sequence if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the        test nucleic acid sequence to the reference nucleic acid        sequence is less than about 0.1, more preferably less than about        0.011 and most preferably less than about 0.001.    -   To obtain gapped alignments for comparison purposes, Gapped        BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be utilized as described in Altschul et        al. 1997. Alternatively, PSI-BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be used to        perform an iterated search that detects distant relationships        between molecules. See Altschul et al., supra. When utilizing        BLAST, Gapped BLAST, PSI-BLAST, the default parameters of the        respective programs (e.g. BLASTN for nucleotide sequences,        BLASTX for proteins) can be used. The BLASTN program (for        nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11,        an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=−4, and a        comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP        program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an        expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see        Henikoff & Henikoff, 1989). Alignment may also be performed        manually by inspection.    -   For purposes of the present invention, comparison of nucleotide        sequences for determination of percent sequence identity to the        promoter sequences disclosed herein is preferably made using the        BlastN program (version 1.4.7 or later) with its default        parameters or any equivalent program. By “equivalent program” is        intended any sequence comparison program that, for any two        sequences in question, generates an alignment having identical        nucleotide or amino acid residue matches and an identical        percent sequence identity when compared to the corresponding        alignment generated by the preferred program.-   (c) As used herein, “sequence identity” or “identity” in the context    of two nucleic acid or polypeptide sequences makes reference to the    residues in the two sequences that are the same when aligned for    maximum correspondence over a specified comparison window. When    percentage of sequence identity is used in reference to proteins it    is recognized that residue positions which are not identical often    differ by conservative amino acid substitutions, where amino acid    residues are substituted for other amino acid residues with similar    chemical properties (e.g., charge or hydrophobicity) and therefore    do not change the functional properties of the molecule. When    sequences differ in conservative substitutions, the percent sequence    identity may be adjusted upwards to correct for the conservative    nature of the substitution. Sequences that differ by such    conservative substitutions are said to have “sequence similarity” or    “similarity.” Means for making this adjustment are well known to    those of skill in the art. Typically this involves scoring a    conservative substitution as a partial rather than a full mismatch,    thereby increasing the percentage sequence identity. Thus, for    example, where an identical amino acid is given a score of 1 and a    non-conservative substitution is given a score of zero, a    conservative substitution is given a score between zero and 1. The    scoring of conservative substitutions is calculated, e.g., as    implemented in the program PC/GENE (Intelligenetics, Mountain View,    Calif.).-   (d) As used herein, “percentage of sequence identity” means the    value determined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over a    comparison window, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide    sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or    deletions (i.e., gaps) as compared to the reference sequence (which    does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of    the two sequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the    number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base or    amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of    matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the    total number of positions in the window of comparison, and    multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence    identity.-   (e) (i) The term “substantial identity” of polynucleotide sequences    means that a polynucleotide comprises a sequence that has at least    70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, or 79%, preferably at    least 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, or 89%, more    preferably at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, or 94%, and most preferably    at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity, compared to a    reference sequence using one of the alignment programs described    using standard parameters. One of skill in the art will recognize    that these values can be appropriately adjusted to determine    corresponding identity of proteins encoded by two nucleotide    sequences by taking into account codon degeneracy, amino acid    similarity, reading frame positioning, and the like. Sub-stantial    identity of amino acid sequences for these purposes normally means    sequence identity of at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%,    90%, and most preferably at least 95%.    -   Another indication that nucleotide sequences are substantially        identical is if two molecules hybridize to each other under        stringent conditions (see below). Generally, stringent        conditions are selected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal        melting point (T_(m)) for the specific sequence at a defined        ionic strength and pH. However, stringent conditions encompass        temperatures in the range of about 1° C. to about 20° C.,        depending upon the desired degree of stringency as otherwise        qualified herein. Nucleic acids that do not hybridize to each        other under stringent conditions are still substantially        identical if the polypeptides they encode are substantially        identical. This may occur, e.g., when a copy of a nucleic acid        is created using the maximum codon degeneracy permitted by the        genetic code. One indication that two nucleic acid sequences are        substantially identical is when the polypeptide encoded by the        first nucleic acid is immunologically cross reactive with the        polypeptide encoded by the second nucleic acid.    -   (ii) The term “substantial identity” in the context of a peptide        indicates that a peptide comprises a sequence with at least 70%,        71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, or 79%, preferably 80%,        81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, or 89%, more preferably        at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, or 94%, or even more preferably,        95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99%, sequence identity to the reference        sequence over a specified comparison window. Preferably, optimal        alignment is conducted using the homology alignment algorithm of        Needleman and Wunsch (1970). An indication that two peptide        sequences are substantially identical is that one peptide is        immunologically reactive with antibodies raised against the        second peptide. Thus, a peptide is substantially identical to a        second peptide, for example, where the two peptides differ only        by a conservative substitution.

For sequence comparison, typically one sequence acts as a referencesequence to which test sequences are compared. When using a sequencecomparison algorithm, test and reference sequences are input into acomputer, subsequence coordinates are designated if necessary, andsequence algorithm program parameters are designated. The sequencecomparison algorithm then calculates the percent sequence identity forthe test sequencers) relative to the reference sequence, based on thedesignated program parameters.

As noted above, another indication that two nucleic acid sequences aresubstantially identical is that the two molecules hybridize to eachother under stringent conditions. The phrase “hybridizing specificallyto” refers to the binding, duplexing, or hybridizing of a molecule onlyto a particular nucleotide sequence under stringent conditions when thatsequence is present in a complex mixture (e.g., total cellular) DNA orRNA. “Bind(s) substantially” refers to complementary hybridizationbetween a probe nucleic acid and a target nucleic acid and embracesminor mismatches that can be accommodated by reducing the stringency ofthe hybridization media to achieve the desired detection of the targetnucleic acid sequence.

“Stringent hybridization conditions” and “stringent hybridization washconditions” in the context of nucleic acid hybridization experimentssuch as Southern and Northern hybridization are sequence dependent, andare different under different environmental parameters. The T_(m) is thetemperature (under defined ionic strength and pH) at which 50% of thetarget sequence hybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. Specificity istypically the function of post-hybridization washes, the criticalfactors being the ionic strength and temperature of the final washsolution. For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated from theequation of Meinkoth and Wahl, 1984:

T_(m)=81.5° C.+16.6(log₁₀ M)+0.41(% GC)−0.61(% form)−500/L

where M is the molarity of monovalent cations, % GC is the percentage ofguanosine and cytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % form is the percentageof formamide in the hybridization solution, and L is the length of thehybrid in base pairs. T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C. for each 1% ofmismatching; thus, T_(m), hybridization, and/or wash conditions can beadjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desired identity. For example,if sequences with >90% identity are sought, the T_(m) can be decreased10° C. Generally, stringent conditions are selected to be about 5° C.lower than the thermal melting point I for the specific sequence and itscomplement at a defined ionic strength and pH. However, severelystringent conditions can utilize a hybridization and/or wash at 1, 2, 3,or 4° C. lower than the thermal melting point I; moderately stringentconditions can utilize a hybridization and/or wash at 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10°C. lower than the thermal melting point I; low stringency conditions canutilize a hybridization and/or wash at 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 20° C.lower than the thermal melting point I. Using the equation,hybridization and wash compositions, and desired T, those of ordinaryskill will understand that variations in the stringency of hybridizationand/or wash solutions are inherently described. If the desired degree ofmismatching results in a T of less than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or 32°C. (formamide solution), it is preferred to increase the SSCconcentration so that a higher temperature can be used. An extensiveguide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen, 1993.Generally, highly stringent hybridization and wash conditions areselected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point T_(m)for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH.

An example of highly stringent wash conditions is 0.15 M NaCl at 72° C.for about 15 minutes. An example of stringent wash conditions is a0.2×SSC wash at 65° C. for 15 minutes (see, Sambrook, infra, for adescription of SSC buffer). Often, a high stringency wash is pre-cededby a low stringency wash to remove background probe signal. An examplemedium stringency wash for a duplex of, e.g., more than 100 nucleotides,is 1×SSC at 45° C. for 15 minutes. An example low stringency wash for aduplex of, e.g., more than 100 nucleotides, is 4 to 6×SSC at 40° C. for15 minutes. For short probes (e.g., about 10 to 50 nucleotides),stringent conditions typically involve salt concentrations of less thanabout 1.5 M, more preferably about 0.01 to 1.0 M, Na ion concentration(or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3, and the temperature is typically atleast about 30° C. and at least about 60° C. for long robes (e.g., >50nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with theaddition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. In general, a signalto noise ratio of 2× (or higher) than that observed for an unrelatedprobe in the particular hybridization assay indicates detection of aspecific hybridization. Nucleic acids that do not hybridize to eachother under stringent conditions are still substantially identical ifthe proteins that they encode are substantially identical. This occurs,e.g., when a copy of a nucleic acid is created using the maximum codondegeneracy permitted by the genetic code.

Very stringent conditions are selected to be equal to the T_(m) for aparticular probe. An example of stringent conditions for hybridizationof complementary nucleic acids which have more than 100 complementaryresidues on a filter in a Southern or Northern blot is 50% formamide,e.g., hybridization in 50% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., and awash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Exemplary low stringency conditionsinclude hybridization with a buffer solution of 30 to 35% formamide, 1 MNaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) at 37° C., and a wash in 1× to2×SSC (20×SSC=3.0 M NaCl/0.3 M trisodium citrate) at 50 to 55° C.Exemplary moderate stringency conditions include hybridization in 40 to45% formamide, 1.0 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., and a wash in 0.5× to 1×SSCat 55 to 60° C.

The following are examples of sets of hybridization/wash conditions thatmay be used to clone orthologous nucleotide sequences that aresubstantially identical to reference nucleotide sequences of the presentinvention: a reference nucleotide sequence preferably hybridizes to thereference nucleotide sequence in 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 MNaPO₄, 1 mM EDTA at 50° C. with washing in 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50° C.more desirably in 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO₄, 1 mMEDTA at 50° C. with washing in 1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50° C., more desirablystill in 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO₄, 1 mM EDTA at 50°C. with washing in 0.5×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50° C., preferably in 7% sodiumdodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO₄, 1 mM EDTA at 50° C. with washing in0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50° C., more preferably in 7% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), 0.5 M NaPO₄, 1 mM EDTA at 50° C. with washing in 0.1×SSC,0.1% SDS at 65° C.

“DNA shuffling” is a method to introduce mutations or rearrangements,preferably randomly, in a DNA molecule or to generate exchanges of DNAsequences between two or more DNA molecules, preferably randomly. TheDNA molecule resulting from DNA shuffling is a shuffled DNA moleculethat is a non-naturally occurring DNA molecule derived from at least onetemplate DNA molecule. The shuffled DNA preferably encodes a variantpolypeptide modified with respect to the polypeptide encoded by thetemplate DNA, and may have an altered biological activity with respectto the polypeptide encoded by the template DNA.

“Recombinant DNA molecule’ is a combination of DNA sequences that arejoined together using recombinant DNA technology and procedures used tojoin together DNA sequences as described, for example, in Sambrook etal., 1989.

The word “plant” refers to any plant, particularly to seed plant, and“plant cell” is a structural and physiological unit of the plant, whichcomprises a cell wall but may also refer to a protoplast. The plant cellmay be in form of an isolated single cell or a cultured cell, or as apart of higher organized unit such as, for example, a plant tissue, or aplant organ differentiated into a structure that is present at any stageof a plant's development. Such structures include one or more plantorgans including, but are not limited to, fruit, shoot, stem, leaf,flower petal, etc. Preferably, the term “plant” includes whole plants,shoot vegetative organs/structures (e.g. leaves, stems and tubers),roots, flowers and floral organs/structures (e.g. bracts, sepals,petals, stamens, carpels, anthers and ovules), seeds (including embryo,endosperm, and seed coat) and fruits (the mature ovary), plant tissues(e.g. vascular tissue, ground tissue, and the like) and cells (e.g.guard cells, egg cells, trichomes and the like), and progeny of same.

The class of plants that can be used in the method of the invention isgenerally as broad as the class of higher and lower plants amenable totransformation techniques, including angiosperms (monocotyledonous anddicotyledonous plants), gymnosperms, ferns, and multicellular algae. Itincludes plants of a variety of ploidy levels, including aneuploid,polyploid, diploid, haploid and hemizygous. Included within the scope ofthe invention are all genera and species of higher and lower plants ofthe plant kingdom. Included are furthermore the mature plants, seed,shoots and seedlings, and parts, propagation material (for example seedsand fruit) and cultures, for example cell cultures, derived therefrom.Preferred are plants and plant materials of the following plantfamilies: Amaranthaceae, Brassicaceae, Carophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae,Compositae, Cucurbitaceae, Labiatae, Leguminosae, Papilionoideae,Lilaceae, Linaceae, Malvaceae, Rosaceae, Saxi/ragaceae,Scrophulariaceae, Solanaceae, Tetragoniaceae.

Annual, perennial, monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants arepreferred host organisms for the generation of transgenic plants. Theuse of the recombination system, or method according to the invention isfurthermore advantageous in all ornamental plants, forestry, fruit, orornamental trees, flowers, cut flowers, shrubs or turf. Said plant mayinclude—but shall not be limited to—bryophytes such as, for example,Hepaticae (hepaticas) and Musci (mosses); pteridophytes such as ferns,horsetail and clubmosses; gymnosperms such as conifers, cycads, ginkgoand Gnetaeae; algae such as Chlorophyceae, Phaeophpyceae, Rhodophyceae,Myxophyceae, Xanthophyceae, Bacillariophyceae (diatoms) andEuglenophyceae.

Plants for the purposes of the invention may comprise the families ofthe Rosaceae such as rose, Ericaceae such as rhododendrons and azaleas,Euphorbiaceae such as poinsettias and croton, Caryophyllaceae such aspinks, Solanaceae such as petunias, Gesneriaceae such as African violet,Balsaminaceae such as touch-me-not, Orchidaceae such as orchids,Iridaceae such as gladioli, iris, freesia and crocus, Compositae such asmarigold, Geraniaceae such as geraniums, Liliaceae such as Drachaena,Moraceae such as ficus, Araceae such as philodendron and many others.

The transgenic plants according to the invention are furthermoreselected in particular from among dicotyledonous crop plants such as,for example, from the families of the Leguminosae such as pea, alfalfaand soybean; the family of the Umbelliferae, particularly the genusDaucus (very particularly the species carota (carrot)) and Apium (veryparticularly the species graveolens var. dulce (celery)) and manyothers; the family of the Solanaceae, particularly the genusLycopersicon, very particularly the species esculentum (tomato) and thegenus Solanum, very particularly the species tuberosum (potato) andmelongena (aubergine), tobacco and many others; and the genus Capsicum,very particularly the species annum (pepper) and many others; the familyof the Leguminosae, particularly the genus Glycine, very particularlythe species max (soybean) and many others; and the family of theCruciferae, particularly the genus Brassica, very particularly thespecies napus (oilseed rape), campestris (beet), oleracea cv Tastie(cabbage), oleracea cv Snowball Y (cauliflower) and oleracea cv Emperor(broccoli); and the genus Arabidopsis, very particularly the speciesthaliana and many others; the family of the Compositae, particularly thegenus Lactuca, very particularly the species sativa (lettuce) and manyothers.

The transgenic plants according to the invention may be selected amongmonocotyledonous crop plants, such as, for example, cereals such aswheat, barley, sorghum and millet, rye, triticale, maize, rice or oats,and sugarcane. Further preferred are trees such as apple, pear, quince,plum, cherry, peach, nectarine, apricot, papaya, mango, and other woodyspecies including coniferous and deciduous trees such as poplar, pine,sequoia, cedar, oak, etc. Especially preferred are Arabidopsis thaliana,Nicotiana tabacum, oilseed rape, soybean, corn (maize), wheat, linseed,potato and tagetes.

“Significant increase” is an increase that is larger than the margin oferror inherent in the measurement technique, preferably an increase byabout 2-fold or greater.

“Significantly less” means that the decrease is larger than the marginof error inherent in the measurement technique, preferably a decrease byabout 2-fold or greater.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention thus provides for isolated nucleic acid moleculescomprising a plant nucleotide sequence that directs root-preferential orroot-specific transcription of an operably linked nucleic acid fragmentin a plant cell.

Specifically, the present invention provides transgenic expressioncassettes for regulating root-preferential or root-specific expressionin plants comprising

-   i) at least one transcription regulating nucleotide sequence of a    plant gene, said plant gene selected from the group of genes    described by the GenBank Arabidopsis thaliana genome locii    At1g66280, At1g74500, At1g49570, At1g70710, At5g66690, At3g29630,    At5g48070, or At4g17800, or a functional equivalent thereof, and    functionally linked thereto-   ii) at least one nucleic acid sequence which is heterologous in    relation to said promoter sequence.

The root-preferential or root-specific promoters may be useful foralteration of the function of root tissue, modification of growth rate,improvement of resistance to root preferred pathogens, pests, herbicidesor adverse weather conditions, for detoxification of soil as well as forbroadening the range of soils or environments in which said plant maygrow. Root abundant or root specific gene expression would provide amechanism according to which morphology and metabolism may be altered toimprove the yield and to produce useful proteins in greater amounts.

The term “root” in the context of the inventions means the usuallyunderground organ of a plant that lacks buds or leaves or nodes, absorbswater and mineral salts and usually it anchors the plant to the ground.The plant root consists of many cell types such as epidermal, root cap,columella, cortex, pericycle, vascular and root hair formingtrichoblasts, organized into tissues or regions of the root, forexample, the root tip, root epidermis, meristematic zone, primary root,laternal root, root hair, and vascular tissue. Transcription regulatinsequences isolated as root-specific or root-preferred may regulatedexpression in one or a few of these cell types. This cell-specificactivity can be useful for specific applications such as regulatingmeristematic activity in only meristematic cell zone or expression of anematicidal gene in only the cell type that are contacted by thenematode pest.

“Root-specific transcription” in the context of this invention means thetranscription of a nucleic acid sequence by a transcription regulatingelement in a way that transcription of said nucleic acid sequence inroots contribute to more than 90%, preferably more than 95%, morepreferably more than 99% of the entire quantity of the RNA transcribedfrom said nucleic acid sequence in the entire plant during any of itsdevelopmental stage. For example, the transcription regulating sequensesdesignated with the following abreviations (and specified inmoe detailsin the examples) are considered to provide a root-specific expressionprofile: pSUH320, pSUH320S, pSUH320L, pSUH320 GB, pSUH335S, pSUH335L,pSUH335 GB, pSUH338, pSUH338 GB, pSUH307, pSUH307S pSUH307 GB, pSUH349,pSUH349S and pSUH349 GB

“Root-preferential transcription” in the context of this invention meansthe transcription of a nucleic acid sequence by a transcriptionregulating element in a way that transcription of said nucleic acidsequence in roots contribute to more than 50%, preferably more than 70%,more preferably more than 80% of the entire quantity of the RNAtranscribed from said nucleic acid sequence in the entire plant duringany of its developmental stage. For example, the transcriptionregulating sequenses designated with the following abreviations (andspecified inmoe details in the examples) are considered to provide aroot-preferential expression profile: pSUH319, pSUH319S, pSUH319 GBpSUH378, pSUH378 GB, pSUH382, pSUH382 GB, pSUH372, pSUH372S and pSUH372GB, pSUH379

Said transcription regulating nucleotide sequence may comprise thepromoter sequence of said genes but may further comprise other elementssuch as the 5′-untranslated sequence, enhancer, introns etc. Preferably,said promoter sequence directs root-preferential or root-specifictranscription of an operably linked nucleic acid segment in a plant orplant cell e.g., a linked plant DNA comprising an open reading frame fora structural or regulatory gene.

The following Table 1 illustrates the genes from which the promoters ofthe invention are preferably isolated, the function of said genes, thecDNA encoded by said genes, and the protein (ORF) encoded by said genes.

TABLE 1 Genes from which the promoters of the invention are preferablyisolated, putative function of said genes, cDNA and the protein encodedby said genes. Promotor mRNA locus ID Proteine ID Gene Locus Putativefunction SEQ ID cDNA SEQ ID Protein SEQ ID At1g66280 glycosyl hydrolasefamily 1 SEQ ID NO: NM_105299 NP_176802 1, 2, 3, 4 SEQ ID NO: 5 SEQ IDNO: 6 At1g74500 bHLH family protein SEQ ID NO: NM_106110 NP_177590 7, 8,9, 10, 11 SEQ ID NO: 12 SEQ ID NO: 13 At1g49570 peroxidase ATP5a SEQ IDNO: NM_103845 NP_175380 14, 15, 16 SEQ ID NO: 17 SEQ ID NO: 18 At1g70710endo-1,4-beta-glucanase SEQ ID NO: NM_105739 NP_177228 19, 20, 21, SEQID NO: 22 SEQ ID NO: 23 At5g66690 UTP-glucose glucosyl- SEQ ID NO:NM_126067 NP_201470 transferase 24, 25, 26, SEQ ID NO: 27 SEQ ID NO: 28At3g29630 UDP-glucose:flavonoid SEQ ID NO: NM_113884 NP_189604glucosyltransferase 29, 30, 31 SEQ ID NO: 32 SEQ ID NO: 33 At5g48070Xyloglucan endo-1,4-beta- SEQ ID NO: NM_124181 NP_199618 D-glucanase 34,35, 36, 37 SEQ ID NO: 38 SEQ ID NO: 39 At4g17800 DNA-binding protein-SEQ ID NO: NM_117890 NP_193515 related 40, 41, 42 SEQ ID NO: 43 SEQ IDNO: 44

Preferably the transcription regulating nucleotide sequence is selectedfrom the group of sequences consisting of

-   i) the sequences described by SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10,    11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37,    40, 41, and 42,-   ii) a fragment of at least 50 consecutive bases of a sequence    under i) which has substantially the same promoter activity as the    corresponding transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described    by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21,    24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42;-   iii) a nucleotide sequence having substantial similarity to a    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO:    1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29,    30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42;-   iv) a nucleotide sequence capable of hybridizing to a transcription    regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4,    7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34,    35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42, or the complement thereof;-   v) a nucleotide sequence capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid    comprising 50 to 200 or more consecutive nucleotides of a    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO:    1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29,    30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42, or the complement thereof;-   vi) a nucleotide sequence which is the complement or reverse    complement of any of the previously mentioned nucleotide sequences    under i) to v).

A functional equivalent of the transcription regulating nucleotidesequence can be obtained or is obtainable from plant genomic DNA from agene encoding a polypeptide which is substantially similar andpreferably has at least 70%, preferably 80%, more preferably 90%, mostpreferably 95% amino acid sequence identity to a polypeptide encoded byan Arabidopsis thaliana gene comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 6, 13,18, 23, 28, 33, 39, or 44, respectively, or a fragment of saidtranscription regulating nucleotide sequence which exhibits promoteractivity in a root-preferential or root-specific fashion.

The activity of a transcription regulating sequence is consideredequivalent if transcription is initiated at most times and in mosttissues. Such expression profile is preferably demonstrated usingreporter genes operably linked to said transcription regulatingsequence. Preferred reporter genes (Schenborn 1999) in this context aregreen fluorescence protein (GFP) (Chui 1996; Leffel 1997),chloramphenicol transferase, luciferase (Millar 1992), β-glucuronidaseor β-galactosidase. Especially preferred is α-glucuronidase (Jefferson1987). The term “at most times” means a transcription regulatingactivity (as demonstrated by an β-glucuronidase assays as described inthe examples below) preferably during at least 50%, preferably at least70%, more preferably at least 90% of the development cycle of a plantcomprising the respective expression cassette stably integrated into itschromosomal DNA. The term “in most tissues” means a transcriptionregulating activity (as demonstrated by an β-glucuronidase assays asdescribed in the examples below) in tissues which together account topreferably at least 50%, preferably at least 70%, more preferably atleast 90% of the entire biomass of the a plant comprising the respectiveexpression cassette stably integrated into its chromosomal DNA.

Beside this the transcription regulating activity of a functionequivalent may vary from the activity of its parent sequence, especiallywith respect to expression level. The expression level may be higher orlower than the expression level of the parent sequence. Both derivationsmay be advantageous depending on the nucleic acid sequence of interestto be expressed. Preferred are such functional equivalent sequenceswhich—in comparison with its parent sequence—does not derivate from theexpression level of said parent sequence by more than 50%, preferably25%, more preferably 10% (as to be preferably judged by either mRNAexpression or protein (e.g., reporter gene) expression). Furthermorepreferred are equivalent sequences which demonstrate an increasedexpression in comparison to its parent sequence, preferably an increasemy at least 50%, more preferably by at least 100%, most preferably by atleast 500%.

Preferably functional equivalent of the transcription regulatingnucleotide sequence can be obtained or is obtainable from plant genomicDNA from a gene expressing a mRNA described by a cDNA which issubstantially similar and preferably has at least 70%, preferably 80%,more preferably 90%, most preferably 95% sequence identity to a sequencedescribed by any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, or 43,respectively, or a fragment of said transcription regulating nucleotidesequence which exhibits promoter activity in a root-preferential orroot-specific fashion.

Such functional equivalent of the transcription regulating nucleotidesequence may be obtained from other plant species by using theroot-preferential or root-specific Arabidopsis promoter sequencesdescribed herein as probes to screen for homologous structural genes inother plants by hybridization under low, moderate or stringenthybridization conditions. Regions of the root-preferential orroot-specific promoter sequences of the present invention which areconserved among species could also be used as PCR primers to amplify asegment from a species other than Arabidopsis, and that segment used asa hybridization probe (the latter approach permitting higher stringencyscreening) or in a transcription assay to determine promoter activity.Moreover, the root-preferential or root-specific promoter sequencescould be employed to identify structurally related sequences in adatabase using computer algorithms.

More specifically, based on the Arabidopsis nucleic acid sequences ofthe present invention, orthologs may be identified or isolated from thegenome of any desired organism, preferably from another plant, accordingto well known techniques based on their sequence similarity to theArabidopsis nucleic acid sequences, e.g., hybridization, PCR or computergenerated sequence comparisons. For example, all or a portion of aparticular Arabidopsis nucleic acid sequence is used as a probe thatselectively hybridizes to other gene sequences present in a populationof cloned genomic DNA fragments or cDNA fragments (i.e., genomic or cDNAlibraries) from a chosen source organism. Further, suitable genomic andcDNA libraries may be prepared from any cell or tissue of an organism.Such techniques include hybridization screening of plated DNA libraries(either plaques or colonies; see, e.g., Sambrook 1989) and amplificationby PCR using oligonucleotide primers preferably corresponding tosequence domains conserved among related polypeptide or subsequences ofthe nucleotide sequences provided herein (see, e.g., Innis 1990). Thesemethods are particularly well suited to the isolation of gene sequencesfrom organisms closely related to the organism from which the probesequence is derived. The application of these methods using theArabidopsis sequences as probes is well suited for the isolation of genesequences from any source organism, preferably other plant species. In aPCR approach, oligonucleotide primers can be designed for use in PCRreactions to amplify corresponding DNA sequences from cDNA or genomicDNA extracted from any plant of interest. Methods for designing PCRprimers and PCR cloning are generally known in the art.

In hybridization techniques, all or part of a known nucleotide sequenceis used as a probe that selectively hybridizes to other correspondingnucleotide sequences present in a population of cloned genomic DNAfragments or cDNA fragments (i.e., genomic or cDNA libraries) from achosen organism. The hybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments,cDNA fragments, RNA fragments, or other oligonucleotides, and may belabeled with a detectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectablemarker. Thus, for example, probes for hybridization can be made bylabeling synthetic oligonucleotides based on the sequence of theinvention. Methods for preparation of probes for hybridization and forconstruction of cDNA and genomic libraries are generally known in theart and are disclosed in Sambrook et al. (1989). In general, sequencesthat hybridize to the sequences disclosed herein will have at least 40%to 50%, about 60% to 70% and even about 80% 85%, 90%, 95% to 98% or moreidentity with the disclosed sequences. That is, the sequence similarityof sequences may range, sharing at least about 40% to 50%, about 60% to70%, and even about 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% to 98% sequence similarity.

The nucleic acid molecules of the invention can also be identified by,for example, a search of known databases for genes encoding polypeptideshaving a specified amino acid sequence identity or DNA having aspecified nucleotide sequence identity. Methods of alignment ofsequences for comparison are well known in the art and are describedhereinabove.

Hence, the isolated nucleic acid molecules of the invention include theorthologs of the Arabidopsis sequences disclosed herein, i.e., thecorresponding nucleotide sequences in organisms other than Arabidopsis,including, but not limited to, plants other than Arabidopsis, preferablydicotyledonous plants, e.g., Brassica napus, alfalfa, sunflower,soybean, cotton, peanut, tobacco or sugar beet, but also cereal plantssuch as corn, wheat, rye, turfgrass, sorghum, millet, sugarcane, barleyand banana. An orthologous gene is a gene from a different species thatencodes a product having the same or similar function, e.g., catalyzingthe same reaction as a product encoded by a gene from a referenceorganism. Thus, an ortholog includes polypeptides having less than,e.g., 65% amino acid sequence identity, but which ortholog encodes apolypeptide having the same or similar function. Databases such GenBankmay be employed to identify sequences related to the Arabidopsissequences, e.g., orthologs in other dicotyledonous plants such asBrassica napus and others. Alternatively, recombinant DNA techniquessuch as hybridization or PCR may be employed to identify sequencesrelated to the Arabidopsis sequences or to clone the equivalentsequences from different Arabidopsis DNAs.

The transcription regulating nucleotide sequences of the invention ortheir functional equivalents can be obtained or isolated from any plantor non-plant source, or produced synthetically by purely chemical means.Preferred sources include, but are not limited to the plants defined inthe DEFINITION section above.

Thus, another embodiment of the invention relates to a method foridentifying and/or isolating a sequence with root-preferential orroot-specific transcription regulating activity utilizing a nucleic acidsequence encoding a amino acid sequence as described by SEQ ID NO: 6,13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 39, or 44 or a part thereof. Preferred are nucleicacid sequences described by SEQ ID NO; 5, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, or 43or parts thereof. “Part” in this context means a nucleic acid sequenceof at least 15 bases preferably at least 25 bases, more preferably atleast 50 bases. The method can be based on (but is not limited to) themethods described above such as polymerase chain reaction, hybridizationor database screening. Preferably, this method of the invention is basedon a polymerase chain reaction, wherein said nucleic acid sequence orits part is utilized as oligonucleotide primer. The person skilled inthe art is aware of several methods to amplify and isolate the promoterof a gene starting from part of its coding sequence (such as, forexample, part of a cDNA). Such methods may indude but are not limited tomethod such as inverse PCR (“iPCR”) or “thermal asymmetric interlacedPCR” (“TAIL PCR”).

Another embodiment of the invention is related to a method for providinga transgenic expression cassette for root-preferential or root-specificexpression comprising the steps of:

-   I. isolating of a root-preferential or root-specific transcription    regulating nucleotide sequence utilizing at least one nucleic acid    sequence or a part thereof, wherein said sequence is encoding a    polypeptide described by SEQ ID NO: 6, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 39, or    44, or a part of at least 15 bases thereof and-   II. functionally linking said root-preferential or root-specific    transcription regulating nucleotide sequence to another nucleotide    sequence of interest, which is heterologous in relation to said    root-preferential or root-specific transcription regulating    nucleotide sequence.

Preferably, the nucleic acid sequence employed for the isolationcomprises at least 15 base, preferably at least 25 bases, morepreferably at least 50 bases of a sequence described by SEQ ID NO: 5,12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, or 43. Preferably, the isolation of therootipreferential or root-specific transcription regulating nucleotidesequence is realized by a polymerase chain reaction utilizing saidnucleic acid sequence as a primer. The operable linkage can be realizedby standard cloning method known in the art such as ligation-mediatedcloning or recombination-mediated cloning.

Preferably, the transcription regulating nucleotide sequences andpromoters of the invention include a consecutive stretch of about 25 to2000, including 50 to 500 or 100 to 250, and up to 1000 or 1500,contiguous nucleotides, e.g., 40 to about 743, 600 to about 743, 125 toabout 743, 250 to about 743, 400 to about 743, 600 to about 743, of anyone of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21,24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, and 42, or the promoterorthologs thereof which include the minimal promoter region.

In a particular embodiment of the invention said consecutive stretch ofabout 25 to 2000, including 50 to 500 or 100 to 250, and up to 1000 or1500, contiguous nucleotides, e.g., 40 to about 743, 60 to about 743,125 to about 743, 250 to about 743, 400 to about 743, 600 to about 743,has at least 75%, preferably 80%, more preferably 90% and mostpreferably 95%, nucleic acid sequence identity with a correspondingconsecutive stretch of about 25 to 2000, including 50 to 500 or 100 to250, and up to 1000 or 1500, contiguous nucleotides, e.g., 40 to about743, 60 to about 743, 125 to about 743, 250 to about 743, 400 to about743, 600 to about 743, of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37,40, 41, and 42, or the promoter orthologs thereof, which include theminimal promoter region. The above defined stretch of contiguousnucleotides preferably comprises one or more promoter motifs selectedfrom the group consisting of TATA box, GC-box, CAAT-box and atranscription start site.

The transcription regulating nucleotide sequences of the invention ortheir functional equivalents are capable of driving root-preferential orroot-specific expression of a coding sequence in a target cell,particularly in a plant cell. The promoter sequences and methodsdisclosed herein are useful in regulating root-preferential orroot-specific expression, respectively, of any heterologous nucleotidesequence in a host plant in order to vary the phenotype of that plant.These promoters can be used with combinations of enhancer, upstreamelements, and/or activating sequences from the 5′ flanking regions ofplant expressible structural genes. Similarly the upstream element canbe used in combination with various plant promoter sequences.

The transcription regulating nucleotide sequences and promoters of theinvention are useful to modify the phenotype of a plant. Various changesin the phenotype of a transgenic plant are desirable, i.e., modifyingthe fatty acid composition in a plant, altering the amino acid contentof a plant, altering a plant's pathogen defense mechanism, and the like.These results can be achieved by providing expression of heterologousproducts or increased expression of endogenous products in plants.Alternatively, the results can be achieved by providing for a reductionof expression of one or more endogenous products, particularly enzymesor cofactors in the plant. These changes result in an alteration in thephenotype of the transformed plant.

Generally, the transcription regulating nucleotide sequences andpromoters of the invention may be employed to express a nucleic acidsegment that is operably linked to said promoter such as, for example,an open reading frame, or a portion thereof, an anti-sense sequence, asequence encoding for a double-stranded RNA sequence, or a transgene inplants.

An operable linkage may—for example—comprise an sequential arrangementof the transcription regulating sequence of the invention (for example asequence as described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15,16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42)with a nucleic acid sequence to be expressed, and—optionally—additionalregulatory elements such as for example polyadenylation or transcriptiontermination elements, enhancers, introns etc, in a way that thetranscription regulating sequence can fulfill its function in theprocess of expression the nucleic acid sequence of interest under theappropriate conditions. the term “appropriate conditions” meanpreferably the presence of the expression cassette in a plant cell.Preferred are arrangements, in which the nucleic acid sequence ofinterest to be expressed is placed down-stream (i.e., in 3′-direction)of the transcription regulating sequence of the invention in a way, thatboth sequences are covalently linked. Optionally additional sequencesmay be inserted in-between the two sequences. Such sequences may be forexample linker or multiple cloning sites. Furthermore, sequences can beinserted coding for parts of fusion proteins (in case a fusion proteinof the protein encoded by the nucleic acid of interest is intended to beexpressed). Preferably, the distance between the nucleic acid sequenceof interest to be expressed and the transcription regulating sequence ofthe invention is not more than 200 base pairs, preferably not more than100 base pairs, more preferably no more than 50 base pairs.

An operable linkage in relation to any expression cassette or of theinvention may be realized by various methods known in the art,comprising both in vitro and in vivo procedure. Thus, an expressioncassette of the invention or an vector comprising such expressioncassette may by realized using standard recombination and cloningtechniques well known in the art (see e.g., Maniatis 1989; Silhavy 1984;Ausubel 1987).

An expression cassette may also be assembled by inserting atranscription regulating sequence of the invention (for example asequence as described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15,16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42)into the plant genome. Such insertion will result in an operable linkageto a nucleic acid sequence of interest which as such already existed inthe genome. By the insertion the nucleic acid of interest is expressedin a root-preferential or root-specific way due to the transcriptionregulating properties of the transcription regulating sequence. Theinsertion may be directed or by chance. Preferably the insertion isdirected and realized by for example homologous recombination. By thisprocedure a natural promoter may be exchanged against the transcriptionregulating sequence of the invention, thereby modifying the expressionprofile of an endogenous gene. The transcription regulating sequence mayalso be inserted in a way, that antisense mRNA of an endogenous gene isexpressed, thereby inducing gene silencing.

Similar, a nucleic acid sequence of interest to be expressed may byinserted into a plant genome comprising the transcription regulatingsequence in its natural genomic environment (i.e. linked to its naturalgene) in a way that the inserted sequence becomes operably linked to thetranscription regulating sequence, thereby forming an expressioncassette of the invention.

The open reading frame to be linked to the transcription regulatingsequence of the invention may be obtained from an insect resistancegene, a disease resistance gene such as, for example, a bacterialdisease resistance gene, a fungal disease resistance gene, a viraldisease resistance gene, a nematode disease resistance gene, a herbicideresistance gene, a gene affecting grain composition or quality, anutrient utilization gene, a mycotoxin reduction gene, a male sterilitygene, a selectable marker gene, a screenable marker gene, a negativeselectable marker, a positive selectable marker, a gene affecting plantagronomic characteristics, i.e., yield, standability, and the like, oran environment or stress resistance gene, i.e., one or more genes thatconfer herbicide resistance or tolerance, insect resistance ortolerance, disease resistance or tolerance (viral, bacterial, fungal,oomycete, or nematode), stress tolerance or resistance (as exemplifiedby resistance or tolerance to drought, heat, chilling, freezing,excessive moisture, salt stress, or oxidative stress), increased yields,food content and makeup, physical appearance, male sterility, drydown,standability, prolificacy, starch properties or quantity, oil quantityand quality, amino acid or protein composition, and the like. By“resistant” is meant a plant which exhibits substantially no phenotypicchanges as a consequence of agent administration, infection with apathogen, or exposure to stress. By “tolerant” is meant a plant which,although it may exhibit some phenotypic changes as a consequence ofinfection, does not have a substantially decreased reproductive capacityor substantially altered metabolism.

Root-preferential or root-specific promoters are useful for expressing awide variety of genes including those which alter metabolic pathways,confer disease resistance, for protein production, e.g., antibodyproduction, or to improve nutrient uptake and the like.Root-preferential or root-specific promoters may be modified so as to beregulatable, e.g., inducible. The genes and promoters describedhereinabove can be used to identify orthologous genes and theirpromoters which are also likely expressed in a particular tissue and/ordevelopment manner. Moreover, the orthologous promoters are useful toexpress linked open reading frames. In addition, by aligning thepromoters of these orthologs, novel cis elements can be identified thatare useful to generate synthetic promoters.

The expression regulating nucleotide sequences specified above may beoptionally operably linked to other suitable regulatory sequences, e.g.,a transcription terminator sequence, operator, repressor binding site,transcription factor binding site and/or an enhancer.

The present invention further provides a recombinant vector containingthe expression cassette of the invention, and host cells comprising theexpression cassette or vector, e.g., comprising a plasmid. Theexpression cassette or vector may augment the genome of a transformedplant or may be maintained extra chromosomally. The expression cassetteor vector of the invention may be present in the nucleus, chloroplast,mitochondria and/or plastid of the cells of the plant. Preferably, theexpression cassette or vector of the invention is comprised in thechromosomal DNA of the plant nucleus. The present invention alsoprovides a transgenic plant prepared by this method, a seed from such aplant and progeny plants from such a plant including hybrids andinbreds. The expression cassette may be operatively linked to astructural gene, the open reading frame thereof, or a portion thereof.The expression cassette may further comprise a Ti plasmid and becontained in an Agrobacterium tumefaciens cell; it may be carried on amicroparticle, wherein the microparticle is suitable for ballistictransformation of a plant cell; or it may be contained in a plant cellor protoplast. Further, the expression cassette or vector can becontained in a transformed plant or cells thereof, and the plant may bea dicot or a monocot. In particular, the plant may be a dicotyledonousplant. Pre-ferred transgenic plants are transgenic maize, soybean,barley, alfalfa, sunflower, canola, soybean, cotton, peanut, sorghum,tobacco, sugarbeet, rice, wheat, rye, turfgrass, millet, sugarcane,tomato, or potato.

The invention also provides a method of plant breeding, e.g., to preparea crossed fertile transgenic plant. The method comprises crossing afertile transgenic plant comprising a particular expression cassette ofthe invention with itself or with a second plant, e.g., one lacking theparticular expression cassette, to prepare the seed of a crossed fertiletransgenic plant comprising the particular expression cassette. The seedis then planted to obtain a crossed fertile transgenic plant. The plantmay be a monocot or a dicot. In a particular embodiment, the plant is adicotyledonous plant. The crossed fertile transgenic plant may have theparticular expression cassette inherited through a female parent orthrough a male parent. The second plant may be an inbred plant. Thecrossed fertile transgenic may be a hybrid. Also included within thepresent invention are seeds of any of these crossed fertile transgenicplants.

The transcription regulating sequences of the invention further comprisesequences which are complementary to one (hereinafter “test” sequence)which hybridizes under stringent conditions with a nucleic acid moleculeas described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19,20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42, as wellas RNA which is transcribed from the nucleic acid molecule. When thehybridization is performed under stringent conditions, either the testor nucleic acid molecule of invention is preferably supported, e.g., ona membrane or DNA chip. Thus, either a denatured test or nucleic acidmolecule of the invention is preferably first bound to a support andhybridization is effected for a specified period of time at atemperature of, e.g., between 55 and 70° C., in double strength citratebuffered saline (SC) containing 0.1% SDS followed by rinsing of thesupport at the same temperature but with a buffer having a reduced SCconcentration. Depending upon the degree of stringency required suchreduced concentration buffers are typically single strength SCcontaining 0.1% SDS, half strength SC containing 0.1% SDS and one-tenthstrength SC containing 0.1% SDS. More preferably hybridization iscarried out under high stringency conditions (as defined above).

Virtually any DNA composition may be used for delivery to recipientplant cells, e.g., dicotyledonous cells, to ultimately produce fertiletransgenic plants in accordance with the present invention. For example,DNA segments or fragments in the form of vectors and plasmids, or linearDNA segments or fragments, in some instances containing only the DNAelement to be expressed in the plant, and the like, may be employed. Theconstruction of vectors which may be employed in conjunction with thepresent invention will be known to those of skill of the art in light ofthe present disclosure (see, e.g., Sambrook 1989; Gelvin 1990).

Vectors, plasmids, cosmids, YACs (yeast artificial chromosomes), BACs(bacterial artificial chromosomes) and DNA segments for use intransforming such cells will, of course, generally comprise the cDNA,gene or genes which one desires to introduce into the cells. These DNAconstructs can further include structures such as promoters, enhancers,polylinkers, or even regulatory genes as desired. The DNA segment,fragment or gene chosen for cellular introduction will often encode aprotein which will be expressed in the resultant recombinant cells, suchas will result in a screenable or selectable trait and/or which willimpart an improved phenotype to the regenerated plant. However, this maynot always be the case, and the present invention also encompassestransgenic plants incorporating non-expressed transgenes.

In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that one may wish to employreplication-competent viral vectors in monocot transformation. Suchvectors include, for example, wheat dwarf virus (WDV) “shuttle” vectors,such as pW1-11 and PW1-GUS (Ugaki 1991). These vectors are capable ofautonomous replication in maize cells as well as E. coli, and as suchmay provide increased sensitivity for detecting DNA delivered totransgenic cells. A replicating vector may also be useful for deliveryof genes flanked by DNA sequences from transposable elements such as Ac,Ds, or Mu. It has been proposed (Laufs 1990) that transposition of theseelements within the maize genome requires DNA replication. It is alsocontemplated that transposable elements would be useful for introducingDNA segments or fragments lacking elements necessary for selection andmaintenance of the plasmid vector in bacteria, e.g., antibioticresistance genes and origins of DNA replication. It is also proposedthat use of a transposable element such as Ac, Ds, or Mu would activelypromote integration of the desired DNA and hence increase the frequencyof stably transformed cells. The use of a transposable element such asAc, Ds, or Mu may actively promote integration of the DNA of interestand hence increase the frequency of stably transformed cells.Transposable elements may be useful to allow separation of genes ofinterest from elements necessary for selection and maintenance of aplasmid vector in bacteria or selection of a transformant. By use of atransposable element, desirable and undesirable DNA sequences may betransposed apart from each other in the genome, such that throughgenetic segregation in progeny, one may identify plants with either thedesirable undesirable DNA sequences.

The nucleotide sequence of interest linked to one or more of thetranscription regulating sequences of the invention can, for example,code for a ribosomal RNA, an antisense RNA or any other type of RNA thatis not translated into protein. In another preferred embodiment of theinvention, said nucleotide sequence of interest is translated into aprotein product. The transcription regulating sequence and/or nucleotidesequence of interest linked thereto may be of homologous or heterologousorigin with respect to the plant to be transformed. A recombinant DNAmolecule useful for introduction into plant cells includes that whichhas been derived or isolated from any source, that may be subsequentlycharacterized as to structure, size and/or function, chemically altered,and later introduced into plants. An example of a nucleotide sequence orsegment of interest “derived” from a source, would be a nucleotidesequence or segment that is identified as a useful fragment within agiven organism, and which is then chemically synthesized in essentiallypure form. An example of such a nucleotide sequence or segment ofinterest “isolated” from a source, would be nucleotide sequence orsegment that is excised or removed from said source by chemical means,e.g., by the use of restriction endonucleases, so that it can be furthermanipulated, e.g., amplified, for use in the invention, by themethodology of genetic engineering. Such a nucleotide sequence orsegment is commonly referred to as “recombinant.”

Therefore a useful nucleotide sequence, segment or fragment of interestincludes completely synthetic DNA, semi-synthetic DNA, DNA isolated frombiological sources, and DNA derived from introduced RNA. Generally, theintroduced DNA is not originally resident in the plant genotype which isthe recipient of the DNA, but it is within the scope of the invention toisolate a gene from a given plant genotype, and to subsequentlyintroduce multiple copies of the gene into the same genotype, e.g., toenhance production of a given gene product such as a storage protein ora protein that confers tolerance or resistance to water deficit.

The introduced recombinant DNA molecule includes but is not limited to,DNA from plant genes, and non-plant genes such as those from bacteria,yeasts, animals or viruses. The introduced DNA can include modifiedgenes, portions of genes, or chimeric genes, including genes from thesame or different genotype. The term “chimeric gene” or “chimeric DNA”is defined as a gene or DNA sequence or segment comprising at least twoDNA sequences or segments from species which do not combine DNA undernatural conditions, or which DNA sequences or segments are positioned orlinked in a manner which does not normally occur in the native genome ofuntransformed plant.

The introduced recombinant DNA molecule used for transformation hereinmay be circular or linear, double-stranded or single-stranded.Generally, the DNA is in the form of chimeric DNA, such as plasmid DNA,that can also contain coding regions flanked by regulatory sequenceswhich promote the expression of the recombinant DNA present in theresultant plant. Generally, the introduced recombinant DNA molecule willbe relatively small, i.e., less than about 30 kb to minimize anysusceptibility to physical, chemical, or enzymatic degradation which isknown to increase as the size of the nucleotide molecule increases. Asnoted above, the number of proteins, RNA transcripts or mixtures thereofwhich is introduced into the plant genome is preferably preselected anddefined, e.g., from one to about 5-10 such products of the introducedDNA may be formed.

Two principal methods for the control of expression are known, viz.:overexpression and underexpression. Overexpression can be achieved byinsertion of one or more than one extra copy of the selected gene. Itis, however, not unknown for plants or their progeny, originallytransformed with one or more than one extra copy of a nucleotidesequence, to exhibit the effects of underexpression as well asoverexpression. For underexpression there are two principle methodswhich are commonly referred to in the art as “antisense downregulation”and “sense downregulation” (sense downregulation is also referred to as“cosuppression”). Generically these processes are referred to as “genesilencing”. Both of these methods lead to an inhibition of expression ofthe target gene.

Obtaining sufficient levels of transgene expression in the appropriateplant tissues is an important aspect in the production of geneticallyengineered crops. Expression of heterologous DNA sequences in a planthost is dependent upon the presence of an operably linked promoter thatis functional within the plant host. Choice of the promoter sequencewill determine when and where within the organism the heterologous DNAsequence is expressed.

It is specifically contemplated by the inventors that one couldmutagenize a promoter to potentially improve the utility of the elementsfor the expression of transgenes in plants. The mutagenesis of theseelements can be carried out at random and the mutagenized promotersequences screened for activity in a trial-by-error procedure.Alternatively, particular sequences which provide the promoter withdesirable expression characteristics, or the promoter with expressionenhancement activity, could be identified and these or similar sequencesintroduced into the sequences via mutation. It is further contemplatedthat one could mutagenize these sequences in order to enhance theirexpression of transgenes in a particular species.

The means for mutagenizing a DNA segment encoding a promoter sequence ofthe current invention are well-known to those of skill in the art. Asindicated, modifications to promoter or other regulatory element may bemade by random, or site-specific mutagenesis procedures. The promoterand other regulatory element may be modified by altering their structurethrough the addition or deletion of one or more nucleotides from thesequence which encodes the corresponding unmodified sequences.

Mutagenesis may be performed in accordance with any of the techniquesknown in the art, such as, and not limited to, synthesizing anoligonucleotide having one or more mutations within the sequence of aparticular regulatory region. In particular, site-specific mutagenesisis a technique useful in the preparation of promoter mutants, throughspecific mutagenesis of the underlying DNA. The technique furtherprovides a ready ability to prepare and test sequence variants, forexample, incorporating one or more of the foregoing considerations, byintroducing one or more nucleotide sequence changes into the DNA.Site-specific mutagenesis allows the production of mutants through theuse of specific oligonucleotide sequences which encode the DNA sequenceof the desired mutation, as well as a sufficient number of adjacentnucleotides, to provide a primer sequence of sufficient size andsequence complexity to form a stable duplex on both sides of thedeletion junction being traversed. Typically, a primer of about 17 toabout 75 nucleotides or more in length is preferred, with about 10 toabout 25 or more residues on both sides of the junction of the sequencebeing altered.

In general, the technique of site-specific mutagenesis is well known inthe art, as exemplified by various publications. As will be appreciated,the technique typically employs a phage vector which exists in both asingle stranded and double stranded form. Typical vectors useful insite-directed mutagenesis include vectors such as the M13 phage. Thesephage are readily commercially available and their use is generally wellknown to those skilled in the art. Double stranded plasmids also areroutinely employed in site directed mutagenesis which eliminates thestep of transferring the gene of interest from a plasmid to a phage.

In general, site-directed mutagenesis in accordance herewith isperformed by first obtaining a single-stranded vector or melting apartof two strands of a double stranded vector which includes within itssequence a DNA sequence which encodes the promoter. An oligonucleotideprimer bearing the desired mutated sequence is prepared, generallysynthetically. This primer is then annealed with the single-strandedvector, and subjected to DNA polymerizing enzymes such as E. colipolymerase I Klenow fragment, in order to complete the synthesis of themutation-bearing strand. Thus, a heteroduplex is formed wherein onestrand encodes the original non-mutated sequence and the second strandbears the desired mutation. This heteroduplex vector is then used totransform or transfect appropriate cells, such as E. coli cells, andcells are selected which include recombinant vectors bearing the mutatedsequence arrangement. Vector DNA can then be isolated from these cellsand used for plant transformation. A genetic selection scheme wasdevised by Kunkel et al. (1987) to enrich for clones incorporatingmutagenic oligonucleotides. Alternatively, the use of PCR withcommercially available thermostable enzymes such as Taq polymerase maybe used to incorporate a mutagenic oligonucleotide primer into anamplified DNA fragment that can then be cloned into an appropriatecloning or expression vector. The PCR-mediated mutagenesis procedures ofTomic et al. (1990) and Upender et al. (1995) provide two examples ofsuch protocols. A PCR employing a thermostable ligase in addition to athermostable polymerase also may be used to incorporate a phosphorylatedmutagenic oligonucleotide into an amplified DNA fragment that may thenbe cloned into an appropriate cloning or expression vector. Themutagenesis procedure described by Michael (1994) provides an example ofone such protocol.

The preparation of sequence variants of the selected promoter-encodingDNA segments using site-directed mutagenesis is provided as a means ofproducing potentially useful species and is not meant to be limiting asthere are other ways in which sequence variants of DNA sequences may beobtained. For example, recombinant vectors encoding the desired promotersequence may be treated with mutagenic agents, such as hydroxylamine, toobtain sequence variants.

As used herein; the term “oligonucleotide directed mutagenesisprocedure” refers to template-dependent processes and vector-mediatedpropagation which result in an increase in the concentration of aspecific nucleic acid molecule relative to its initial concentration, orin an increase in the concentration of a detectable signal, such asamplification. As used herein, the term “oligonucleotide directedmutagenesis procedure” also is intended to refer to a process thatinvolves the template-dependent extension of a primer molecule. The termtemplate-dependent process refers to nucleic acid synthesis of an RNA ora DNA molecule wherein the sequence of the newly synthesized strand ofnucleic acid is dictated by the well-known rules of complementary basepairing (see, for example, Watson and Rarnstad, 1987). Typically, vectormediated methodologies involve the introduction of the nucleic acidfragment into a DNA or RNA vector, the clonal amplification of thevector, and the recovery of the amplified nucleic acid fragment.Examples of such methodologies are provided by U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,224.A number of template dependent processes are available to amplify thetarget sequences of interest present in a sample, such methods beingwell known in the art and specifically disclosed herein below.

Where a clone comprising a promoter has been isolated in accordance withthe instant invention, one may wish to delimit the essential promoterregions within the clone. One efficient, targeted means for preparingmutagenizing promoters relies upon the identification of putativeregulatory elements within the promoter sequence. This can be initiatedby comparison with promoter sequences known to be expressed in similartissue-specific or developmentally unique manner. Sequences which areshared among promoters with similar expression patterns are likelycandidates for the binding of transcription factors and are thus likelyelements which confer expression patterns. Confirmation of theseputative regulatory elements can be achieved by deletion analysis ofeach putative regulatory region followed by functional analysis of eachdeletion construct by assay of a reporter gene which is functionallyattached to each construct. As such, once a starting promoter sequenceis provided, any of a number of different deletion mutants of thestarting promoter could be readily prepared.

Functionally equivalent fragments of a transcription regulating sequenceof the invention can also be obtained by removing or deletingnon-essential sequences without deleting the essential one. Narrowingthe transcription regulating sequence to its essential, transcriptionmediating elements can be realized in vitro by trial-and-arrow deletionmutations, or in silico using promoter element search routines. Regionsessential for promoter activity often demonstrate clusters of certain,known promoter elements. Such analysis can be performed using availablecomputer algorithms such as PLACE (“Plant Cis-acting Regulatory DNAElements”; Higo 1999), the BIOBASE database “Transfac” (BiologischeDatenbanken GmbH, Braunschweig; Wingender 2001) or the databasePlantCARE (Lescot 2002).

Preferably, functional equivalent fragments of one of the transcriptionregulating sequences of the invention comprises at least 100 base pairs,preferably, at least 200 base pairs, more preferably at least 500 basepairs of a transcription regulating sequence as described by SEQ ID NO:1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30,31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, or 42. More preferably this fragment isstarting from the 3′-end of the indicated sequences.

Especially preferred are equivalent fragments of transcriptionregulating sequences, which are obtained by deleting the region encodingthe 5′-untranslated region of the mRNA, thus only providing the(untranscribed) promoter region. The 5′-untranslated region can beeasily determined by methods known in the art (such as 5′-RACEanalysis). Accordingly, some of the transcription regulating sequencesof the invention are equivalent fragments of other sequences (see Table2 below),

TABLE 2 Relationship of transcription regulating sequences of theinvention Transcription regulating sequence Equivalent sequenceEquivalent fragment SEQ ID NO: 2 (3293 bp) — SEQ ID NO; 1 (1656 bp) SEQID NO: 3 (3246 bp) SEQ ID NO: 4 (1656 bp) SEQ ID NO: 7 (3360 bp) SEQ IDNO: 9 (3363 bp) SEQ ID NO: 8 (3207 bp) SEQ 10 NO: 10 (1291 bp) SEQ IDNO: 11 (1294 bp) SEQ ID NO: 14 (2831 bp) SEQ ID NO: 16 (2830 bp) SEQ IDNO: 15 (2791 bp) SEQ ID NO: 19 (3142 bp) SEQ ID NO: 21 (3180 bp) SEQ IDNO: 20 (3104 bp) SEQ ID NO: 24 (3208 bp) SEQ ID NO: 26 (3208 bp) SEQ IDNO: 25 (3141 bp) SEQ ID NO: 29 (1993 bp) SEQ ID NO: 31 (1994 bp) SEQ IDNO: 30 (1909 bp) SEQ ID NO: 34 (2535 bp) SEQ ID NO: 35 (3141 bp) SEQ 10NO: 36 (1309 bp) SEQ ID NO: 37 (1304 bp) SEQ ID NO: 40 (3040 bp) SEQ 10NO: 42 (3041 bp) SEQ ID NO: 41 (2801 bp)

As indicated above, deletion mutants, deletion mutants of the promoterof the invention also could be randomly prepared and then assayed. Withthis strategy, a series of constructs are prepared, each containing adifferent portion of the clone (a subclone), and these constructs arethen screened for activity. A suitable means for screening for activityis to attach a deleted promoter or intron construct which contains adeleted segment to a selectable or screenable marker, and to isolateonly those cells expressing the marker gene. In this way, a number ofdifferent, deleted promoter constructs are identified which still retainthe desired, or even enhanced, activity. The smallest segment which isrequired for activity is thereby identified through comparison of theselected constructs. This segment may then be used for the constructionof vectors for the expression of exogenous genes.

An expression cassette of the invention may comprise further regulatoryelements. The term in this context is to be understood in the a broadmeaning comprising all sequences which may influence construction orfunction of the expression cassette, Regulatory elements may for examplemodify transcription and/or translation in prokaryotic or eukaryoticorganism. In an preferred embodiment the expression cassette of theinvention comprised downstream (in 3′-direction) of the nucleic acidsequence to be expressed a transcription termination sequenceand—optionally additional regulatory elements—each operably liked to thenucleic acid sequence to be expressed (or the transcription regulatingsequence).

Additional regulatory elements may comprise additional promoter, minimalpromoters, or promoter elements, which may modify the expressionregulating properties. For example the expression may be made dependingon certain stress factors such water stress, abscisin (Lam 1991) or heatstress (Schoffl 1989). Furthermore additional promoters or promoterelements may be employed, which may realized expression in otherorganisms (such as E. coli or Agrobacterium). Such regulatory elementscan be find in the promoter sequences or bacteria such as amy and SPO2or in the promoter sequences of yeast or fungal promoters (such as ADC1,MFa, AC, P-60, CYC1, GAPDH, TEF, rp28, and ADH).

Furthermore, it is contemplated that promoters combining elements frommore than one promoter may be useful. For example, U.S. Pat. No.5,491,288 discloses combining a Cauliflower Mosaic Virus promoter with ahistone promoter. Thus, the elements from the promoters disclosed hereinmay be combined with elements from other promoters. Promoters which areuseful for plant transgene expression include those that are inducible,viral, synthetic, constitutive (Odell 1985), temporally regulated,spatially regulated, tissue-specific, and spatial-temporally regulated.

Where expression in specific tissues or organs is desired,tissue-specific promoters may be used. In contrast, where geneexpression in response to a stimulus is desired, inducible promoters arethe regulatory elements of choice. Where continuous expression isdesired throughout the cells of a plant, constitutive promoters areutilized. Additional regulatory sequences upstream and/or downstreamfrom the core promoter sequence may be included in expression constructsof transformation vectors to bring about varying levels of expression ofheterologous nucleotide sequences in a transgenic plant.

A variety of 5′ and 3′ transcriptional regulatory sequences areavailable for use in the present invention. Transcriptional terminatorsare responsible for the termination of transcription and correct mRNApolyadenylation. The 3′ nontranslated regulatory DNA sequence preferablyincludes from about 50 to about 1,000, more preferably about 100 toabout 1,000, nucleotide base pairs and contains plant transcriptionaland translational termination sequences. Appropriate transcriptionalterminators and those which are known to function in plants include theCaMV 35S terminator, the tml terminator, the nopaline synthaseterminator, the pea rbcS E9 terminator, the terminator for the T7transcript from the octopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens,and the 3′ end of the protease inhibitor I or II genes from potato ortomato, although other 3′ elements known to those of skill in the artcan also be employed. Alternatively, one also could use a gamma coixin,oleosin 3 or other terminator from the genus Coix.

Preferred 3′ elements include those from the nopaline synthase gene ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens (Bevan 1983), the terminator for the T7transcript from the octopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens,and the 3′ end of the protease inhibitor I or II genes from potato ortomato.

As the DNA sequence between the transcription initiation site and thestart of the coding sequence, i.e., the untranslated leader sequence,can influence gene expression, one may also wish to employ a particularleader sequence. Preferred leader sequences are contemplated to includethose which include sequences predicted to direct optimum expression ofthe attached gene, i.e., to include a preferred consensus leadersequence which may increase or maintain mRNA stability and preventinappropriate initiation of translation. The choice of such sequenceswill be known to those of skill in the art in light of the presentdisclosure. Sequences that are derived from genes that are highlyexpressed in plants will be most preferred.

Preferred regulatory elements also include the 5′-untranslated region,introns and the 3′-untranslated region of genes. Such sequences thathave been found to enhance gene expression in transgenic plants includeintron sequences (e.g., from Adh1, bronze1, actin1, actin 2 (WO00/760067), or the sucrose synthase intron; see: The Maize Handbook,Chapter 116, Freeling and Walbot, Eds., Springer, New York (1994)) andviral leader sequences (e.g., from TMV, MCMV and AMV; Gallie 1987). Forexample, a number of non-translated leader sequences derived fromviruses are known to enhance expression. Specifically, leader sequencesfrom Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV), Maize Chlorotic Mottle Virus (MCMV),and Alfalfa Mosaic Virus (AMV) have been shown to be effective inenhancing expression (e.g., Gallie 1987; Skuzeski 1990). Other leadersknown in the art include but are not limited to: Picornavirus leaders,for example, EMCV leader (Encephalomyocarditis 5′ noncoding region)(Elroy-Stein 1989); Potyvirus leaders, for example, TEV leader (TobaccoEtch Virus); MDMV leader (Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus); Humanimmunoglobulin heavy-chain binding protein (BiP) leader, (Macejak 1991);Untranslated leader from the coat protein mRNA of alfalfa mosaic virus(AMV RNA 4), (Jobling 1987; Tobacco mosaic virus leader (TMV), (Gallie1989; and Maize Chlorotic Mottle Virus leader (MCMV) (Lommel 1991. Seealso, Della-Cioppa 1987. Regulatory elements such as Adh intron 1(Callis 1987), sucrose synthase intron (Vasil 1989) or TMV omega element(Gallie 1989), may further be included where desired. Especiallypreferred are the 5′-untranslated region, introns and the3′-untranslated region from the genes described by the GenBankArabidopsis thaliana genome locii At1g66280, At1g74500, At1g49570,At1g70710, At5g66690, At3g29630, At5g48070, or At4g17800, or offunctional equivalent thereof.

Additional preferred regulatory elements are enhancer sequences orpolyadenylation sequences. Preferred polyadenylation sequences are thosefrom plant genes or Agrobacterium T-DNA genes (such as for example theterminator sequences of the OCS (octopine synthase) or NOS (nopalinesynthase) genes).

Examples of enhancers include elements from the CaMV 35S promoter,octopine synthase genes (Ellis et al., 1987), the rice actin I gene, themaize alcohol dehydrogenase gene (Callis 1987), the maize shrunken Igene (Vasil 1989), TMV Omega element (Gallie 1989) and promoters fromnon-plant eukaryotes (e.g. yeast; Ma 1988). Vectors for use inaccordance with the present invention may be constructed to include theocs enhancer element. This element was first identified as a 16 bppalindromic enhancer from the octopine synthase (ocs) gene of ultilane(Ellis 1987), and is present in at least 10 other promoters (Bouchez1989). The use of an enhancer element, such as the ocs elements andparticularly multiple copies of the element, will act to increase thelevel of transcription from adjacent promoters when applied in thecontext of plant transformation.

An expression cassette of the invention (or a vector derived therefrom)may comprise additional functional elements, which are to be understoodin the broad sense as all elements which influence construction,propagation, or function of an expression cassette or a vector or atransgenic organism comprising them. Such functional elements mayinclude origin of replications (to allow replication in bacteria, forthe ORI of pBR322 or the P15A ori; Sambrook 1989), or elements requiredfor Agrobacterium T-DNA transfer (such as for example the left and/orrights border of the T-DNA).

Ultimately, the most desirable DNA segments for introduction into, forexample, a dicot genome, may be homologous genes or gene families whichencode a desired trait (e.g., increased yield per acre) and which areintroduced under the control of novel promoters or enhancers, etc., orperhaps even homologous or tissue specific (e.g., root-, collar/sheath-,whorl-, stalk-, earshank-, kernel- or leaf-specific) promoters orcontrol elements. Indeed, it is envisioned that a particular use of thepresent invention will be the expression of a gene in aroot-preferential or root-specific manner.

Additionally, vectors may be constructed and employed in theintracellular targeting of a specific gene product within the cells of atransgenic plant or in directing a protein to the extracellularenvironment. This will generally be achieved by joining a DNA sequenceencoding a transit or signal peptide sequence to the coding sequence ofa particular gene. The resultant transit or signal peptide willtransport the protein to a particular intracellular or extracellulardestination, respectively, and will then be post-transiationallyremoved. Transit or signal peptides act by facilitating the transport ofproteins through intracellular membranes, e.g., vacuole, vesicle,plastid and mitochondrial membranes, whereas signal peptides directproteins through the extracellular membrane.

A particular example of such a use concerns the direction of a herbicideresistance gene, such as the EPSPS gene, to a particular organelle suchas the chloroplast rather than to the cytoplasm. This is exemplified bythe use of the rbcs transit peptide which confers plastid-specifictargeting of proteins. In addition, it is proposed that it may bedesirable to target certain genes responsible for male sterility to themitochondria, or to target certain genes for resistance tophytopathogenic organisms to the extracellular spaces, or to targetproteins to the vacuole.

By facilitating the transport of the protein into compartments insideand outside the cell, these sequences may increase the accumulation ofgene product protecting them from proteolytic degradation. Thesesequences also allow for additional mRNA sequences from highly expressedgenes to be attached to the coding sequence of the genes. Since mRNAbeing translated by ribosomes is more stable than naked mRNA, thepresence of translatable mRNA in front of the gene may increase theoverall stability of the mRNA transcript from the gene and therebyincrease synthesis of the gene product. Since transit and signalsequences are usually post-translationally removed from the initialtranslation product, the use of these sequences allows for the additionof extra translated sequences that may not appear on the finalpolypeptide. Targeting of certain proteins may be desirable in order toenhance the stability of the protein (U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,818).

It may be useful to target DNA itself within a cell. For example, it maybe useful to target introduced DNA to the nucleus as this may increasethe frequency of transformation. Within the nucleus itself it would beuseful to target a gene in order to achieve site specific integration.For example, it would be useful to have an gene introduced throughtransformation replace an existing gene in the cell. Other elementsinclude those that can be regulated by endogenous or exogenous agents,e.g., by zinc finger proteins, including naturally occurring zinc fingerproteins or chimeric zinc finger proteins (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No.5,789,538, WO 99/48909; WO 99/45132; WO 98/53060; WO 98/53057; WO98/53058; WO 00/23464; WO 95/19431; and WO 98/54311) or myb-liketranscription factors. For example, a chimeric zinc finger protein mayinclude amino acid sequences which bind to a specific DNA sequence (thezinc finger) and amino acid sequences that activate (e.g., GAL 4sequences) or repress the transcription of the sequences linked to thespecific DNA sequence.

It is one of the objects of the present invention to provide recombinantDNA molecules comprising a nucleotide sequence according to theinvention operably linked to a nucleotide segment of interest.

A nucleotide segment of interest is reflective of the commercial marketsand interests of those involved in the development of the crop. Cropsand markets of interest changes, and as developing nations open up worldmarkets, new crops and technologies will also emerge. In addition, asthe understanding of agronomic traits and characteristics such as yieldand heterosis increase, the choice of genes for transformation willchange accordingly. General categories of nucleotides of interestinclude, for example, genes involved in information, such as zincfingers, those involved in communication, such as kinases, and thoseinvolved in housekeeping, such as heat shock proteins. More specificcategories of transgenes, for example, include genes encoding importanttraits for agronomics, insect resistance, disease resistance, herbicideresistance, sterility, grain characteristics, and commercial products.Genes of interest include, generally, those involved in starch, oil,carbohydrate, or nutrient metabolism, as well as those affecting kernelsize, sucrose loading, zinc finger proteins, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No.5,789,538, WO 99/48909; WO 99/45132; WO 98/53060; WO 98/53057; WO98/53058; WO 00/23464; WO 95/19431; and WO 98/54311, and the like.

One skilled in the art recognizes that the expression level andregulation of a trans-gene in a plant can vary significantly from lineto line. Thus, one has to test several lines to find one with thedesired expression level and regulation. Once a line is identified withthe desired regulation specificity of a chimeric Cre transgene, it canbe crossed with lines carrying different inactive replicons or inactivetransgene for activation.

Other sequences which may be linked to the gene of interest whichencodes a polypeptide are those which can target to a specificorganelle, e.g., to the mitochondria, nucleus, or plastid, within theplant cell. Targeting can be achieved by providing the polypeptide withan appropriate targeting peptide sequence, such as a secretory signalpeptide (for secretion or cell wall or membrane targeting, a plastidtransit peptide, a chloroplast transit peptide, e.g., the chlorophylla/b binding protein, a mitochondrial target peptide, a vacuole targetingpeptide, or a nuclear targeting peptide, and the like. For example, thesmall subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase transit peptide, theEPSPS transit peptide or the dihydrodipicolinic acid synthase transitpeptide may be used. For examples of plastid organelle targetingsequences (see WO 00/12732). Plastids are a class of plant organellesderived from proplastids and include chloroplasts, leucoplasts,amyloplasts, and chromoplasts. The plastids are major sites ofbiosynthesis in plants. In addition to photosynthesis in thechloroplast, plastids are also sites of lipid biosynthesis, nitratereduction to ammonium, and starch storage. And while plastids containtheir own circular, genome, most of the proteins localized to theplastids are encoded by the nuclear genome and are imported into theorganelle from the cytoplasm.

Transgenes used with the present invention will often be genes thatdirect the expression of a particular protein or polypeptide product,but they may also be non-expressible DNA segments, e.g., transposonssuch as Ds that do no direct their own transposition. As used herein, an“expressible gene” is any gene that is capable of being transcribed intoRNA (e.g., mRNA, antisense RNA, etc.) or translated into a protein,expressed as a trait of interest, or the like, etc., and is not limitedto selectable, screenable or non-selectable marker genes. The inventionalso contemplates that, where both an expressible gene that is notnecessarily a marker gene is employed in combination with a marker gene,one may employ the separate genes on either the same or different DNAsegments for transformation. In the latter case, the different vectorsare delivered concurrently to recipient cells to maximizecotransformation.

The choice of the particular DNA segments to be delivered to therecipient cells will often depend on the purpose of the transformation.One of the major purposes of transformation of crop plants is to addsome commercially desirable, agronomically important traits to theplant. Such traits include, but are not limited to, herbicide resistanceor tolerance; insect resistance or tolerance; disease resistance ortolerance (viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode); stress tolerance and/orresistance, as exemplified by resistance or tolerance to drought, heat,chilling, freezing, excessive moisture, salt stress; oxidative stress;increased yields; food content and makeup; physical appearance; malesterility; drydown; standability; prolificacy; starch properties; oilquantity and quality; and the like. One may desire to incorporate one ormore genes conferring any such desirable trait or traits, such as, forexample, a gene or genes encoding pathogen resistance.

In certain embodiments, the present invention contemplates thetransformation of a recipient cell with more than one advantageoustransgene. Two or more transgenes can be supplied in a singletransformation event using either distinct transgene-encoding vectors,or using a single vector incorporating two or more gene codingsequences. For example, plasmids bearing the bar and aroA expressionunits in either convergent, divergent, or colinear orientation, areconsidered to be particularly useful. Further preferred combinations arethose of an insect resistance gene, such as a Bt gene, along with aprotease inhibitor gene such as pinII, or the use of bar in combinationwith either of the above genes. Of course, any two or more transgenes ofany description, such as those conferring herbicide, insect, disease(viral, bacterial, fungal, nematode) or drought resistance, malesterility, drydown, standability, prolificacy, starch properties, oilquantity and quality, or those increasing yield or nutritional qualitymay be employed as desired.

1. Exemplary Transgenes 1.1. Herbicide Resistance

The genes encoding phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (bar and pat),glyphosate tolerant EPSP synthase genes, the glyphosate degradativeenzyme gene gox encoding glyphosate oxidoreductase, deh (encoding adehalogenase enzyme that inactivates dalapon), herbicide resistant(e.g., sulfonylurea and imidazolinone) acetolactate synthase, and bxngenes (encoding a nitrilase enzyme that degrades bromoxynil) are goodexamples of herbicide resistant genes for use in transformation. The barand pat genes code for an enzyme, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase(PAT), which inactivates the herbicide phosphinothricin and preventsthis compound from inhibiting glutamine synthetase enzymes. The enzyme5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSP Synthase), is normallyinhibited by the herbicide N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine (glyphosate).However, genes are known that encode glyphosate-resistant EPSP Synthaseenzymes. The deh gene encodes the enzyme dalapon dehalogenase andconfers resistance to the herbicide dalapon. The bxn gene codes for aspecific nitrilase enzyme that converts bromoxynil to a non-herbicidaldegradation product.

1.2 Insect Resistance

An important aspect of the present invention concerns the introductionof insect resistance-conferring genes into plants. Potential insectresistance genes which can be introduced include Bacillus thuringiensiscrystal toxin genes or Bt genes (Watrud 1985). Bt genes may provideresistance to lepidopteran or coleopteran pests such as European CornBorer (ECB) and corn rootworm (CRW). Preferred Bt toxin genes for use insuch embodiments include the CrylA(b) and CrylA(c) genes. Endotoxingenes from other species of B. thuringiensis which affect insect growthor development may also be employed in this regard. Protease inhibitorsmay also provide insect resistance (Johnson 1989), and will thus haveutility in plant transformation. The use of a protease inhibitor IIgene, pinII, from tomato or potato is envisioned to be particularlyuseful. Even more advantageous is the use of a pinII gene in combinationwith a Bt toxin gene, the combined effect of which has been discoveredby the present inventors to produce synergistic insecticidal activity.Other genes which encode inhibitors of the insects' digestive system, orthose that encode enzymes or cofactors that facilitate the production ofinhibitors, may also be useful. This group may be exemplified bycystatin and amylase inhibitors, such as those from wheat and barley.

Also, genes encoding lectins may confer additional or alternativeinsecticide properties. Lectins (originally termed phytohemagglutinins)are multivalent carbohydrate-binding proteins which have the ability toagglutinate red blood cells from a range of species. Lectins have beenidentified recently as insecticidal agents with activity againstweevils, EB and rootworm (Murdock 1990; Czapla & Lang, 1990). Lectingenes contemplated to be useful include, for example, barley and wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) and rice lectins (Gatehouse 1984), with WGA beingpreferred.

Genes controlling the production of large or small polypeptides activeagainst insects when introduced into the insect pests, such as, e.g.,lytic peptides, peptide hormones and toxins and venoms, form anotheraspect of the invention. For example, it is contemplated, that theexpression of juvenile hormone esterase, directed towards specificinsect pests, may also result in insecticidal activity, or perhaps causecessation of metamorphosis (Hammock 1990).

Transgenic plants expressing genes which encode enzymes that affect theintegrity of the insect cuticle form yet another aspect of theinvention. Such genes include those encoding, e.g., chitinase,proteases, lipases and also genes for the production of nikkomycin, acompound that inhibits chitin synthesis, the introduction of any ofwhich is contemplated to produce insect resistant maize plants. Genesthat code for activities that affect insect molting, such thoseaffecting the production of ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyl transferase, alsofall within the scope of the useful transgenes of the present invention.

Genes that code for enzymes that facilitate the production of compoundsthat reduce the nutritional quality of the host plant to insect pestsare also encompassed by the present invention. It may be possible, forinstance, to confer insecticidal activity on a plant by altering itssterol composition. Sterols are obtained by insects from their diet andare used for hormone synthesis and membrane stability. Thereforealterations in plant sterol composition by expression of novel genes,e.g., those that directly promote the production of undesirable sterolsor those that convert desirable sterols into undesirable forms, couldhave a negative effect on insect growth and/or development and henceendow the plant with insecticidal activity. Lipoxygenases are naturallyoccurring plant enzymes that have been shown to exhibit anti-nutritionaleffects on insects and to reduce the nutritional quality of their diet.Therefore, further embodiments of the invention concern transgenicplants with enhanced lipoxygenase activity which may be resistant toinsect feeding.

The present invention also provides methods and compositions by which toachieve qualitative or quantitative changes in plant secondarymetabolites. One example concerns transforming plants to produce DIMBOAwhich, it is contemplated, will confer resistance to European cornborer, rootworm and several other maize insect pests. Candidate genesthat are particularly considered for use in this regard include thosegenes at the bx locus known to be involved in the synthetic DIMBOApathway (Dunn 1981). The introduction of genes that can regulate theproduction of maysin, and genes involved in the production of dhurrin insorghum, is also contemplated to be of use in facilitating resistance toearworm and rootworm, respectively.

Tripsacum dactyloides is a species of grass that is resistant to certaininsects, including corn root worm. It is anticipated that genes encodingproteins that are toxic to insects or are involved in the biosynthesisof compounds toxic to insects will be isolated from Tripsacum and thatthese novel genes will be useful in conferring resistance to insects. Itis known that the basis of insect resistance in Tripsacum is genetic,because said resistance has been transferred to Zea mays via sexualcrosses (Branson & Guss, 1972).

Further genes encoding proteins characterized as having potentialinsecticidal activity may also be used as transgenes in accordanceherewith. Such genes include, for example, the cowpea trypsin inhibitor(CpTI; Hilder 1987) which may be used as a rootworm deterrent; genesencoding avermectin (Campbell 1989; Ikeda 1987) which may proveparticularly useful as a corn rootworm deterrent; ribosome inactivatingprotein genes; and even genes that regulate plant structures. Transgenicmaize including anti-insect antibody genes and genes that code forenzymes that can covert a non-toxic insecticide (pro-insecticide)applied to the outside of the plant into an insecticide inside the plantare also contemplated.

1.3 Environment or Stress Resistance

Improvement of a plant's ability to tolerate various environmentalstresses such as, but not limited to, drought, excess moisture,chilling, freezing, high temperature, salt, and oxidative stress, canalso be effected through expression of heterologous, or overexpressionof homologous genes. Benefits may be realized in terms of increasedresistance to freezing temperatures through the introduction of an“antifreeze” protein such as that of the Winter Flounder (Cutler 1989)or synthetic gene derivatives thereof. Improved chilling tolerance mayalso be conferred through increased expression of glycerol-3-phosphateacetyltransferase in chloroplasts (Murata 1992; Wolter 1992). Resistanceto oxidative stress (often exacerbated by conditions such as chillingtemperatures in combination with high light intensities) can beconferred by expression of superoxide dismutase (Gupta 1993), and may beimproved by glutathione reductase (Bowler 1992). Such strategies mayallow for tolerance to freezing in newly emerged fields as well asextending later maturity higher yielding varieties to earlier relativematurity zones.

Expression of novel genes that favorably effect plant water content,total water potential, osmotic potential, and turgor can enhance theability of the plant to tolerate drought. As used herein, the terms“drought resistance” and “drought tolerance” are used to refer to aplants increased resistance or tolerance to stress induced by areduction in water availability, as compared to normal circumstances,and the ability of the plant to function and survive in lower-waterenvironments, and perform in a relatively superior manner. In thisaspect of the invention it is proposed, for example, that the expressionof a gene encoding the biosynthesis of osmotically-active solutes canimpart protection against drought. Within this class of genes are DNAsencoding mannitol dehydrogenase (Lee and Saier, 1982) andtrehalose-6-phosphate synthase (Kaasen 1992). Through the subsequentaction of native phosphatases in the cell or by the introduction andcoexpression of a specific phosphatase, these introduced genes willresult in the accumulation of either mannitol or trehalose,respectively, both of which have been well documented as protectivecompounds able to mitigate the effects of stress. Mannitol accumulationin transgenic tobacco has been verified and preliminary results indicatethat plants expressing high levels of this metabolite are able totolerate an applied osmotic stress (Tarczynski 1992).

Similarly, the efficacy of other metabolites in protecting either enzymefunction (e.g. alanopine or propionic acid) or membrane integrity (e.g.,alanopine) has been documented (Loomis 1989), and therefore expressionof gene encoding the biosynthesis of these compounds can confer droughtresistance in a manner similar to or complimentary to mannitol. Otherexamples of naturally occurring metabolites that are osmotically activeand/or provide some direct protective effect during drought and/ordesiccation include sugars and sugar derivatives such as fructose,erythritol (Coxson 1992), sorbitol, dulcitol (Karsten 1992),glucosyl-glycerol (Reed 1984; Erdmann 1992), sucrose, stachyose (Koster& Leopold 1988; Blackman 1992), ononitol and pinitol (Vernon & Bohnert1992), and raffinose (Bernal-Lugo & Leopold 1992). Other osmoticallyactive solutes which are not sugars include, but are not limited to,proline and glycine-betaine (Wyn-Jones and Storey, 1981). Continuedcanopy growth and increased reproductive fitness during times of stresscan be augmented by introduction and expression of genes such as thosecontrolling the osmotically active compounds discussed above and othersuch compounds, as represented in one exemplary embodiment by the enzymemyoinositol 0-methyltransferase.

It is contemplated that the expression of specific proteins may alsoincrease drought tolerance. Three classes of Late Embryogenic Proteinshave been assigned based on structural similarities (see Dure 1989). Allthree classes of these proteins have been demonstrated in maturing(i.e., desiccating) seeds. Within these 3 types of proteins, the Type-II(dehydrin-type) have generally been implicated in drought and/ordesiccation tolerance in vegetative plant parts (e.g. Mundy and Chua,1988; Piatkowski 1990; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 1992). Recently, expressionof a Type-III LEA (HVA-1) in tobacco was found to influence plantheight, maturity and drought tolerance (Fitzpatrick, 1993). Expressionof structural genes from all three groups may therefore confer droughttolerance. Other types of proteins induced during water stress includethiol proteases, aidolases and transmembrane transporters (Guerrero1990), which may confer various protective and/or repair-type functionsduring drought stress. The expression of a gene that effects lipidbiosynthesis and hence membrane composition can also be useful inconferring drought resistance on the plant.

Many genes that improve drought resistance have complementary modes ofaction. Thus, combinations of these genes might have additive and/orsynergistic effects in improving drought resistance in maize. Many ofthese genes also improve freezing tolerance (or resistance); thephysical stresses incurred during freezing and drought are similar innature and may be mitigated in similar fashion. Benefit may be conferredvia constitutive expression of these genes, but the preferred means ofexpressing these novel genes may be through the use of a turgor-inducedpromoter (such as the promoters for the turgor-induced genes describedin Guerrero et al. 1990 and Shagan 1993). Spatial and temporalexpression patterns of these genes may enable maize to better withstandstress.

Expression of genes that are involved with specific morphological traitsthat allow for increased water extractions from drying soil would be ofbenefit. For example, introduction and expression of genes that alterroot characteristics may enhance water uptake. Expression of genes thatenhance reproductive fitness during times of stress would be ofsignificant value. For example, expression of DNAs that improve thesynchrony of pollen shed and receptiveness of the female flower parts,i.e., silks, would be of benefit. In addition, expression of genes thatminimize kernel abortion during times of stress would increase theamount of grain to be harvested and hence be of value. Regulation ofcytokinin levels in monocots, such as maize, by introduction andexpression of an isopentenyl transferase gene with appropriateregulatory sequences can improve monocot stress resistance and yield(Gan 1995).

Given the overall role of water in determining yield, it is contemplatedthat enabling plants to utilize water more efficiently, through theintroduction and expression of novel genes, will improve overallperformance even when soil water availability is not limiting. Byintroducing genes that improve the ability of plants to maximize waterusage across a full range of stresses relating to water availability,yield stability or consistency of yield performance may be realized.

1.4 Disease Resistance

It is proposed that increased resistance to diseases may be realizedthrough introduction of genes into plants period. It is possible toproduce resistance to diseases caused, by viruses, bacteria, fungi, rootpathogens, insects and nematodes. It is also contemplated that controlof mycotoxin producing organisms may be realized through expression ofintroduced genes.

Resistance to viruses may be produced through expression of novel genes.For example, it has been demonstrated that expression of a viral coatprotein in a transgenic plant can impart resistance to infection of theplant by that virus and perhaps other closely related viruses (Cuozzo1988, Hemenway 1988, Abel 1986). It is contemplated that expression ofantisense genes targeted at essential viral functions may impartresistance to said virus. For example, an antisense gene targeted at thegene responsible for replication of viral nucleic acid may inhibit saidreplication and lead to resistance to the virus. It is believed thatinterference with other viral functions through the use of antisensegenes may also increase resistance to viruses. Further it is proposedthat it may be possible to achieve resistance to viruses through otherapproaches, including, but not limited to the use of satellite viruses.

It is proposed that increased resistance to diseases caused by bacteriaand fungi may be realized through introduction of novel genes. It iscontemplated that genes encoding so-called “peptide antibiotics,”pathogenesis related (PR) proteins, toxin resistance, and proteinsaffecting host-pathogen interactions such as morphologicalcharacteristics will be useful. Peptide antibiotics are polypeptidesequences which are inhibitory to growth of bacteria and othermicroorganisms. For example, the classes of peptides referred to ascecropins and magainins inhibit growth of many species of bacteria andfungi. It is proposed that expression of PR proteins in plants may beuseful in conferring resistance to bacterial disease. These genes areinduced following pathogen attack on a host plant and have been dividedinto at least five classes of proteins (Bol 1990). Included amongst thePR proteins are beta-1,3-glucanases, chitinases, and osmotin and otherproteins that are believed to function in plant resistance to diseaseorganisms. Other genes have been identified that have antifungalproperties, e.g., UDA (stinging nettle lectin) and hevein (Broakgert1989; Barkai-Golan 1978). It is known that certain plant diseases arecaused by the production of phytotoxins. Resistance to these diseasescould be achieved through expression of a novel gene that encodes anenzyme capasble of degrading or otherwise inactivating the phytotoxin.Expression novel genes that alter the interactions between the hostplant and pathogen may be useful in reducing the ability the diseaseorganism to invade the tissues of the host plant, e.g., an increase inthe waxiness of the leaf cuticle or other morphological characteristics.

Plant parasitic nematodes are a cause of disease in many plants. It isproposed that it would be possible to make the plant resistant to theseorganisms through the expression of novel genes. It is anticipated thatcontrol of nematode infestations would be accomplished by altering theability of the nematode to recognize or attach to a host plant and/orenabling the plant to produce nematicidal compounds, including but notlimited to proteins

1.5 Mycotoxin Reduction/Elimination

Production of mycotoxins, including aflatoxin and fumonisin, by fungiassociated with plants is a significant factor in rendering the grainnot useful. These fungal organisms do not cause disease symptoms and/orinterfere with the growth of the plant, but they produce chemicals(mycotoxins) that are toxic to animals. Inhibition of the growth ofthese fungi would reduce the synthesis of these toxic substances and,therefore, reduce grain losses due to mycotoxin contamination. Novelgenes may be introduced into plants that would inhibit synthesis of themycotoxin without interfering with fungal growth. Expression of a novelgene which encodes an enzyme capable of rendering the mycotoxin nontoxicwould be useful in order to achieve reduced mycotoxin contamination ofgrain. The result of any of the above mechanisms would be a reducedpresence of mycotoxins on grain.

1.6 Plant Agronomic Characteristics

Two of the factors determining where plants can be grown are the averagedaily temperature during the growing season and the length of timebetween frosts. Within the areas where it is possible to grow aparticular plant, there are varying limitations on the maximal time itis allowed to grow to maturity and be harvested. The plant to be grownin a particular area is selected for its ability to mature and dry downto harvestable moisture content within the required period of time withmaximum possible yield. Therefore, plant of varying maturities aredeveloped for different growing locations. Apart from the need to drydown sufficiently to permit harvest is the desirability of havingmaximal drying take place in the field to minimize the amount of energyrequired for additional drying post-harvest. Also the more readily thegrain can dry down, the more time there is available for growth andkernel fill. Genes that influence maturity and/or dry down can beidentified and introduced into plant lines using transformationtechniques to create new varieties adapted to different growinglocations or the same growing location but having improved yield tomoisture ratio at harvest. Expression of genes that are involved inregulation of plant development may be especially useful, e.g., theliguleless and rough sheath genes that have been identified in plants.

Genes may be introduced into plants that would improve standability andother plant growth characteristics. For example, expression of novelgenes which confer stronger stalks, improved root systems, or prevent orreduce ear droppage would be of great value to the corn farmer.Introduction and expression of genes that increase the total amount ofphotoassimilate available by, for example, increasing light distributionand/or interception would be advantageous. In addition the expression ofgenes that increase the efficiency of photosynthesis and/or the leafcanopy would further increase gains in productivity. Such approacheswould allow for increased plant populations in the field.

Delay of late season vegetative senescence would increase the flow ofassimilate into the grain and thus increase yield. Overexpression ofgenes within plants that are associated with “stay green” or theexpression of any gene that delays senescence would achieve beadvantageous. For example, a non-yellowing mutant has been identified inFestuca pratensis (Davies 1990). Expression of this gene as well asothers may prevent premature breakdown of chlorophyll and thus maintaincanopy function.

1.7 Nutrient Utilization

The ability to utilize available nutrients and minerals may be alimiting factor in growth of many plants. It is proposed that it wouldbe possible to alter nutrient uptake, tolerate pH extremes, mobilizationthrough the plant, storage pools, and availability for metabolicactivities by the introduction of novel genes. These modifications wouldallow a plant to more efficiently utilize available nutrients. It iscontemplated that an increase in the activity of, for example, an enzymethat is normally present in the plant and involved in nutrientutilization would increase the availability of a nutrient. An example ofsuch an enzyme would be phytase. It is also contemplated that expressionof a novel gene may make a nutrient source available that waspre-viously not accessible, e.g., an enzyme that releases a component ofnutrient value from a more complex molecule, perhaps a macromolecule.

1.8 Non-Protein-Expressing Sequences 1.8.1 RNA-Expressing

DNA may be introduced into plants for the purpose of expressing RNAtranscripts that function to affect plant phenotype yet are nottranslated into protein. Two examples are antisense RNA and RNA withribozyme activity. Both may serve possible functions in reducing oreliminating expression of native or introduced plant genes.

Genes may be constructed or isolated, which when transcribed, produceantisense RNA or double-stranded RNA that is complementary to all orpart(s) of a targeted messenger RNA(s). The antisense RNA reducesproduction of the polypeptide product of the messenger RNA. Thepolypeptide product may be any protein encoded by the plant genome. Theaforementioned genes will be referred to as antisense genes. Anantisense gene may thus be introduced into a plant by transformationmethods to produce a novel transgenic plant with reduced expression of aselected protein of interest. For example, the protein may be an enzymethat catalyzes a reaction in the plant. Reduction of the enzyme activitymay reduce or eliminate products of the reaction which include anyenzymatically synthesized compound in the plant such as fatty acids,amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids and the like. Alternatively,the protein may be a storage protein, such as a zein, or a structuralprotein, the decreased expression of which may lead to changes in seedamino acid composition or plant morphological changes respectively. Thepossibilities cited above are provided only by way of example and do notrepresent the full range of applications.

Expression of antisense-RNA or double-stranded RNA by one of theexpression cassettes of the invention is especially preferred. Alsoexpression of sense RNA can be employed for gene silencing(co-suppression). This RNA is preferably a non-translatable RNA. Generegulation by double-stranded RNA (“double-stranded RNA interference”;dsRNAi) is well known in the arte and described for various organismincluding plants (e.g., Matzke 2000; Fire A et al 1998; WO 99/32619; WO99/53050; WO 00/68374; WO 00/44914; WO 00/44895; WO 00/49035; WO00/63364).

Genes may also be constructed or isolated, which when transcribedproduce RNA enzymes, or ribozymes, which can act as endoribonucleasesand catalyze the cleavage of RNA molecules with selected sequences. Thecleavage of selected messenger RNA's can result in the reducedproduction of their encoded polypeptide products. These genes may beused to prepare novel transgenic plants which possess them. Thetransgenic plants may possess reduced levels of polypeptides includingbut not limited to the polypeptides cited above that may be affected byantisense RNA.

It is also possible that genes may be introduced to produce noveltransgenic plants which have reduced expression of a native gene productby a mechanism of cosuppression. It has been demonstrated in tobacco,tomato, and petunia (Goring 1991; Smith 1990; Napoli 1990; van der Krol1990) that expression of the sense transcript of a native gene willreduce or eliminate expression of the native gene in a manner similar tothat observed for antisense genes. The introduced gene may encode all orpart of the targeted native protein but its translation may not berequired for reduction of levels of that native protein.

1.8.2 Non-RNA-Expressing

For example, DNA elements including those of transposable elements suchas Ds, Ac, or Mu, may be, inserted into a gene and cause mutations.These DNA elements may be inserted in order to inactivate (or activate)a gene and thereby “tag” a particular trait. In this instance thetransposable element does not cause instability of the tagged mutation,because the utility of the element does not depend on its ability tomove in the genome. Once a desired trait is tagged, the introduced DNAsequence may be used to clone the corresponding gene, e.g., using theintroduced DNA sequence as a PCR primer together with PCR gene cloningtechniques (Shapiro, 1983; Dellaporta 1988). Once identified, the entiregene(s) for the particular trait, including control or regulatoryregions where desired may be isolated, cloned and manipulated asdesired. The utility of DNA elements introduced into an organism forpurposed of gene tagging is independent of the DNA sequence and does notdepend on any biological activity of the DNA sequence, i.e.,transcription into RNA or translation into protein. The sole function ofthe DNA element is to disrupt the DNA sequence of a gene.

It is contemplated that unexpressed DNA sequences, including novelsynthetic sequences could be introduced into cells as proprietary“labels” of those cells and plants and seeds thereof. It would not benecessary for a label DNA element to disrupt the function of a geneendogenous to the host organism, as the sole function of this DNA wouldbe to identify the origin of the organism. For example, one couldintroduce a unique DNA sequence into a plant and this DNA element wouldidentify all cells, plants, and progeny of these cells as having arisenfrom that labeled source. It is proposed that inclusion of label DNAswould enable one to distinguish proprietary germplasm or germplasmderived from such, from unlabelled germplasm.

Another possible element which may be introduced is a matrix attachmentregion element (MAR), such as the chicken lysozyme A element (Stief1989), which can be positioned around an expressible gene of interest toeffect an increase in overall expression of the gene and diminishposition dependant effects upon incorporation into the plant genome(Stief 1989; Phi-Van 1990).

Further nucleotide sequences of interest that may be contemplated foruse within the scope of the present invention in operable linkage withthe promoter sequences according to the invention are isolated nucleicacid molecules, e.g., DNA or RNA, comprising a plant nucleotide sequenceaccording to the invention comprising an open reading frame that ispreferentially expressed in a specific tissue, i.e., seed-, root, greentissue (leaf and stem), panicle-, or pollen, or is expressedconstitutively.

2. Marker Genes

In order to improve the ability to identify transformants, one maydesire to employ a selectable or screenable marker gene as, or inaddition to, the expressible gene of interest.

“Marker genes” are genes that impart a distinct phenotype to cellsexpressing the marker gene and thus allow such transformed cells to bedistinguished from cells that do not have the marker. Such genes mayencode either a selectable or screenable marker, depending on whetherthe marker confers a trait which one can ‘select’ for by chemical means,i.e., through the use of a selective agent (e.g., a herbicide,antibiotic, or the like), or whether it is simply a trait that one canidentify through observation or testing, i.e., by ‘screening’ (e.g., theR-locus trait, the green fluorescent protein (GFP)). Of course, manyexamples of suitable marker genes are known to the art and can beemployed in the practice of the invention.

Included within the terms selectable or screenable marker genes are alsogenes which encode a “secretable marker” whose secretion can be detectedas a means of identifying or selecting for transformed cells. Examplesinclude markers which encode a secretable antigen that can be identifiedby antibody interaction, or even secretable enzymes which can bedetected by their catalytic activity. Secretable proteins fall into anumber of classes, including small, diffusible proteins detectable,e.g., by ELISA; small active enzymes detectable in extracellularsolution (e.g., alpha-amylase, beta-lactamase, phosphinothricinacetyltransferase); and proteins that are inserted or trapped in thecell wall (e.g., proteins that include a leader sequence such as thatfound in the expression unit of extensin or tobacco PR-S).

With regard to selectable secretable markers, the use of a gene thatencodes a protein that becomes sequestered in the cell wall, and whichprotein includes a unique epitope is considered to be particularlyadvantageous. Such a secreted antigen marker would ideally employ anepitope sequence that would provide low background in plant tissue, apromoter-leader sequence that would impart efficient expression andtargeting across the plasma membrane, and would produce protein that isbound in the cell wall and yet accessible to antibodies. A normallysecreted wall protein modified to include a unique epitope would satisfyall such requirements.

One example of a protein suitable for modification in this manner isextensin, or hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein (HPRG). For example, themaize HPRG (Steifel 1990) molecule is well characterized in terms ofmolecular biology, expression and protein structure. However, any one ofa variety of ultilane and/or glycine-rich wall proteins (Keller 1989)could be modified by the addition of an antigenic site to create ascreenable marker.

One exemplary embodiment of a secretable screenable marker concerns theuse of a maize sequence encoding the wall protein HPRG, modified toinclude a 15 residue epitope from the pro-region of murine interleukin,however, virtually any detectable epitope may be employed in suchembodiments, as selected from the extremely wide variety ofantigen-antibody combinations known to those of skill in the art. Theunique extracellular epitope can then be straightforwardly detectedusing antibody labeling in conjunction with chromogenic or fluorescentadjuncts.

Elements of the present disclosure may be exemplified in detail throughthe use of the bar and/or GUS genes, and also through the use of variousother markers. Of course, in light of this disclosure, numerous otherpossible selectable and/or screenable marker genes will be apparent tothose of skill in the art in addition to the one set forth herein below.Therefore, it will be understood that the following discussion isexemplary rather than exhaustive. In light of the techniques disclosedherein and the general recombinant techniques which are known in theart, the present invention renders possible the introduction of anygene, including marker genes, into a recipient cell to generate atransformed plant.

2.1 Selectable Markers

Various selectable markers are known in the art suitable for Zea maystransformation. Such markers may include but are not limited to:

2.1.1 Negative Selection Markers

Negative selection markers confer a resistance to a biocidal compoundsuch as a metabolic inhibitor (e.g., 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate, WO98/45456), antibiotics (e.g., kanamycin, G 418, bleomycin or hygromycin)or herbicides (e.g., phosphinothricin or glyphosate). Transformed plantmaterial (e.g., cells, tissues or plantlets), which express markergenes, are capable of developing in the presence of concentrations of acorresponding selection compound (e.g., antibiotic or herbicide) whichsuppresses growth of an untransformed wild type tissue. Especiallypreferred negative selection markers are those which confer resistanceto herbicides. Examples which may be mentioned are:

-   -   Phosphinothricin acetyltransferases (PAT; also named Bialophos®        resistance; bar; de Block 1987; Vasil 1992, 1993; Weeks 1993;        Becker 1994; Nehra 1994; Wan & Lemaux 1994; EP 0 333 033; U.S.        Pat. No. 4,975,374). Preferred are the bar gene from        Streptomyces hygroscopicus or the pat gene from Streptomyces        viridochromogenes. PAT inactivates the active ingredient in the        herbicide bialaphos, phosphinothricin (PPT). PPT inhibits        glutamine synthetase, (Murakami 1986; Twell 1989) causing rapid        accumulation of ammonia and cell death.    -   altered 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS)        conferring resistance to Glyphosate®        (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) (Hinchee 1988; Shah 1986;        Delia-Cioppa 1987). Where a mutant EPSP synthase gene is        employed, additional benefit may be realized through the        incorporation of a suitable chloroplast transit peptide, CTP        (EP-A10 218 571).    -   Glyphosate® degrading enzymes (Glyphosate® oxidoreductase; gox),    -   Dalapon® inactivating dehalogenases (deh)    -   sulfonylurea- and/or imidazolinone-inactivating acetolactate        synthases (ahas or ALS; for example mutated ahas/ALS variants        with, for example, the S4, XI12, XA17, and/or Hra mutation        (EP-A1 154 204)    -   Bromoxynil® degrading nitrilases (bxn; Stalker 1988)    -   Kanamycin- or geneticin (G418) resistance genes (NPTII; NPT or        neo; Potrykus 1985) coding e.g., for neomycin        phosphotransferases (Fraley 1983; Nehra 1994)    -   2-Desoxyglucose-6-phosphate phosphatase (DOG^(R)1-Gene product;        WO 98/45456; EP 0 807 836) conferring resistance against        2-desoxyglucose (Randez-Gil 1995).    -   hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT), which mediates resistance        to hygromycin (Vanden Elzen 1985).    -   altered dihydrofolate reductase (Eichholtz 1987) conferring        resistance against methotrexat (Thillet 1988);    -   mutated anthranilate synthase genes that confers resistance to        5-methyl tryptophan.

Additional negative selectable marker genes of bacterial origin thatconfer resistance to antibiotics include the aadA gene, which confersresistance to the antibiotic spectinomycin, gentamycin acetyltransferase, streptomycin phosphotransferase (SPT),aminoglycoside-3-adenyl transferase and the bleomycin resistancedeterminant (Hayford 1988; Jones 1987; Svab 1990; Hille 1986).

Especially preferred are negative selection markers that conferresistance against the toxic effects imposed by D-amino acids like e.g.,D-alanine and D-serine (WO 03/060133; Erikson 2004). Especiallypreferred as negative selection marker in this contest are the daol gene(EC: 1.4. 3.3: GenBank Acc.-No.: J60066) from the yeast Rhodotorulagracilis (Rhodosporidium toruloides) and the E. coli gene dsdA (D-serinedehydratase (D-serine deaminase) [EC. 4.3. 1.18; GenBank Acc.-No.:J01603).

Transformed plant material (e.g., cells, embryos, tissues or plantlets)which express such marker genes are capable of developing in thepresence of concentrations of a corresponding selection compound (e.g.,antibiotic or herbicide) which suppresses growth of an untransformedwild type tissue. The resulting plants can be bred and hybridized in thecustomary fashion. Two or more generations should be grown in order toensure that the genomic integration is stable and hereditary.Corresponding methods are described (Jenes 1993; Potrykus 1991).

Furthermore, reporter genes can be employed to allow visual screening,which may or may not (depending on the type of reporter gene) requiresupplementation with a substrate as a selection compound.

Various time schemes can be employed for the various negative selectionmarker genes. In case of resistance genes (e.g., against herbicides orD-amino acids) selection is preferably applied throughout callusinduction phase for about 4 weeks and beyond at least 4 weeks intoregeneration. Such a selection scheme can be applied for all selectionregimes. It is furthermore possible (although not explicitly preferred)to remain the selection also throughout the entire regeneration schemeincluding rooting.

For example, with the phosphinotricin resistance gene (bar) as theselective marker, phosphinotricin at a concentration of from about 1 to50 mg/l may be included in the medium. For example, with the dao1 geneas the selective marker, D-serine or D-alanine at a concentration offrom about 3 to 100 mg/l may be included in the medium. Typicalconcentrations for selection are 20 to 40 mg/l. For example, with themutated ahas genes as the selective marker, PURSUIT™ at a concentrationof from about 3 to 100 mg/l may be included in the medium. Typicalconcentrations for selection are 20 to 40 mg/l.

2.1.2 Positive Selection Marker

Furthermore, positive selection marker can be employed. Genes likeisopentenyl-transferase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain:PO22;Genbank Acc.-No.: AB025109) may—as a key enzyme of the cytokininbiosynthesis—facilitate regeneration of transformed plants (e.g., byselection on cytokinin-free medium). Corresponding selection methods aredescribed (Ebinuma 2000a,b). Additional positive selection markers,which confer a growth advantage to a transformed plant in comparisonwith a non-transformed one, are described e.g., in EP-A 0 601 092.Growth stimulation selection markers may include (but shall not belimited to) β-Glucuronidase (in combination with e.g., a cytokininglucuronide), mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (in combination withmannose), UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (in combination with e.g.,galactose), wherein mannose-6-phosphate isomerase in combination withmannose is especially preferred.

2.1.3 Counter-Selection Marker

Counter-selection markers are especially suitable to select organismswith defined deleted sequences comprising said marker (Koprek 1999).Examples for counter-selection marker comprise thymidin kinases (TK),cytosine deaminases (Gleave 1999; Perera 1993; Stougaard 1993),cytochrom P450 proteins (Koprek 1999), haloalkan dehalogenases (Naested1999), iaah gene products (Sundaresan 1995), cytosine deaminase codA(Schiaman & Hooykaas 1997), tms2 gene products (Fedoroff & Smith 1993),or α-naphthalene acetamide (NAM; Depicker 1988). Counter selectionmarkers may be useful in the construction of transposon tagging lines.For example, by marking an autonomous transposable element such as Ac,Master Mu, or En/Spn with a counter selection marker, one could selectfor transformants in which the autonomous element is not stablyintegrated into the genome. This would be desirable, for example, whentransient expression of the autonomous element is desired to activate intrans the transposition of a defective transposable element, such as Ds,but stable integration of the autonomous element is not desired. Thepresence of the autonomous element may not be desired in order tostabilize the defective element, i.e., prevent it from furthertransposing. However, it is proposed that if stable integration of anautonomous transposable element is desired in a plant the presence of anegative selectable marker may make it possible to eliminate theautonomous element during the breeding process.

2.2. Screenable Markers

Screenable markers that may be employed include, but are not limited to,a beta-glucuronidase (GUS) or uidA gene which encodes an enzyme forwhich various chromogenic substrates are known; an R-locus gene, whichencodes a product that regulates the production of anthocyanin pigments(red color) in plant tissues (Dellaporta 1988); a beta-lactamase gene(Sutcliffe 1978), which encodes an enzyme for which various chromogenicsubstrates are known (e.g., PADAC, a chromogenic cephalosporin); a xylEgene (Zukowsky 1983) which encodes a catechol dioxygenase that canconvert chromogenic catechols; an α-amylase gene (Ikuta 1990); atyrosinase gene (Katz 1983) which encodes an enzyme capable of oxidizingtyrosine to DOPA and dopaquinone which in turn condenses to form theeasily detectable compound melanin; β-galactosidase gene, which encodesan enzyme for which there are chromogenic substrates; a luciferase (lux)gene (Ow 1986), which allows for bioluminescence detection; or even anaequorin gene (Prasher 1985), which may be employed in calcium-sensitivebioluminescence detection, or a green fluorescent protein gene (Niedz1995).

Genes from the maize R gene complex are contemplated to be particularlyuseful as screenable markers. The R gene complex in maize encodes aprotein that acts to regulate the production of anthocyanin pigments inmost seed and plant tissue. A gene from the R gene complex was appliedto maize transformation, because the expression of this gene intrans-formed cells does not harm the cells. Thus, an R gene introducedinto such cells will cause the expression of a red pigment and, ifstably incorporated, can be visually scored as a red sector. If a maizeline is carries dominant .quadrature.ultila for genes encoding theenzymatic intermediates in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (C2, A1,A2, Bz1 and Bz2), but carries a recessive allele at the R locus,transformation of any cell from that line with R will result in redpigment formation. Exemplary lines include Wisconsin 22 which containsthe rg-Stadler allele and TR112, a K55 derivative which is r-g, b, P1.Alternatively any genotype of maize can be utilized if the C1 and Ralleles are introduced together.

It is further proposed that R gene regulatory regions may be employed inchimeric constructs in order to provide mechanisms for controlling theexpression of chimeric genes. More diversity of phenotypic expression isknown at the R locus than at any other locus (Coe 1988). It iscontemplated that regulatory regions obtained from regions 5′ to thestructural R gene would be valuable in directing the expression ofgenes, e.g., insect resistance, drought resistance, herbicide toleranceor other protein coding regions. For the purposes of the pre-sentinvention, it is believed that any of the various R gene family membersmay be successfully employed (e.g., P, S, Lc, etc.). However, the mostpreferred will generally be Sn (particularly Sn:bol3). Sn is a dominantmember of the R gene complex and is functionally similar to the R and Bloci in that Sn controls the tissue specific deposition of anthocyaninpigments in certain seedling and plant cells, therefore, its phenotypeis similar to R.

A further screenable marker contemplated for use in the presentinvention is firefly luciferase, encoded by the lux gene. The presenceof the lux gene in transformed cells may be detected using, for example,X-ray film, scintillation counting, fluorescent spectrophotometry,low-light video cameras, photon counting cameras or multiwellluminometry. It is also envisioned that this system may be developed forpopulational screening for bioluminescence, such as on tissue cultureplates, or even for whole plant screening. Where use of a screenablemarker gene such as lux or GFP is desired, benefit may be realized bycreating a gene fusion between the screenable marker gene and aselectable marker gene, for example, a GFP-NPTII gene fusion. This couldallow, for example, selection of transformed cells followed by screeningof transgenic plants or seeds.

3. Exemplary DNA Molecules

The invention provides an isolated nucleic acid molecule, e.g., DNA orRNA, comprising a plant nucleotide sequence comprising an open readingframe that is preferentially expressed in a specific plant tissue, i.e.,in seeds, roots, green tissue (leaf and stem), panicles or pollen, or isexpressed constitutively, or a promoter thereof.

These promoters include, but are not limited to, constitutive,inducible, temporally regulated, developmentally regulated,spatially-regulated, chemically regulated, stress-responsive,tissue-specific, viral and synthetic promoters. Promoter sequences areknown to be strong or weak. A strong promoter provides for a high levelof gene expression, whereas a weak promoter provides for a very lowlevel of gene expression. An inducible promoter is a promoter thatprovides for the turning on and off of gene expression in response to anexogenously added agent, or to an environmental or developmentalstimulus. A bacterial promoter such as the P_(tac) promoter can beinduced to varying levels of gene expression depending on the level ofisothiopropylgalactoside added to the transformed bacterial cells. Anisolated promoter sequence that is a strong promoter for heterologousnucleic acid is advantageous because it provides for a sufficient levelof gene expression to allow for easy detection and selection oftransformed cells and provides for a high level of gene expression whendesired.

Within a plant promoter region there are several domains that arenecessary for full function of the promoter. The first of these domainslies immediately upstream of the structural gene and forms the “corepromoter region” containing consensus sequences, normally 70 base pairsimmediately upstream of the gene. The core promoter region contains thecharacteristic CAAT and TATA boxes plus surrounding sequences, andrepresents a transcription initiation sequence that defines thetranscription start point for the structural gene.

The presence of the core promoter region defines a sequence as being apromoter: if the region is absent, the promoter is non-functional.Furthermore, the core promoter region is insufficient to provide fullpromoter activity. A series of regulatory sequences upstream of the coreconstitute the remainder of the promoter. The regulatory sequencesdetermine expression level, the spatial and temporal pattern ofexpression and, for an important subset of promoters, expression underinductive conditions (regulation by external factors such as light,temperature, chemicals, hormones).

Regulated expression of the chimeric transacting viral replicationprotein can be further regulated by other genetic strategies. Forexample, Cre-mediated gene activation as described by Odell et al. 1990.Thus, a DNA fragment containing 3′ regulatory sequence bound by loxsites between the promoter and the replication protein coding sequencethat blocks the expression of a chimeric replication gene from thepromoter can be removed by Cre-mediated excision and result in theexpression of the trans-acting replication gene. In this case, thechimeric Cre gene, the chimeric trans-acting replication gene, or bothcan be under the control of tissue- and developmental-specific orinducible promoters. An alternate genetic strategy is the use of tRNAsuppressor gene. For example, the regulated expression of a tRNAsuppressor gene can conditionally control expression of a trans-actingreplication protein coding sequence containing an appropriatetermination codon as described by Ulmasov et al. 1997. Again, either thechimeric tRNA suppressor gene, the chimeric transacting replicationgene, or both can be under the control of tissue- anddevelopmental-specific or inducible promoters.

Frequently it is desirable to have continuous or inducible expression ofa DNA sequence throughout the cells of an organism in atissue-independent manner. For example, increased resistance of a plantt6 infection by soil- and airborne-pathogens might be accomplished bygenetic manipulation of the plant's genome to comprise a continuouspromoter operably linked to a heterologous pathogen-resistance gene suchthat pathogen-resistance proteins are continuously expressed throughoutthe plant's tissues.

Alternatively, it might be desirable to inhibit expression of a nativeDNA sequence within the seeds of a plant to achieve a desired phenotype.In this case, such inhibition might be accomplished with transformationof the plant to comprise a promoter operably linked to an antisensenucleotide sequence, such that root-preferential or root-specificexpression of the antisense sequence produces an RNA transcript thatinterferes with translation of the mRNA of the native DNA sequence.

To define a minimal promoter region, a DNA segment representing thepromoter region is removed from the 5′ region of the gene of interestand operably linked to the coding sequence of a marker (reporter) geneby recombinant DNA techniques well known to the art. The reporter geneis operably linked downstream of the promoter, so that transcriptsinitiating at the promoter proceed through the reporter gene. Reportergenes generally encode proteins which are easily measured, including,but not limited to, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT),beta-glucuronidase (GUS), green fluorescent protein (GFP),beta-galactosidase (beta-GAL), and luciferase.

The construct containing the reporter gene under the control of thepromoter is then introduced into an appropriate cell type bytransfection techniques well known to the art. To assay for the reporterprotein, cell lysates are prepared and appropriate assays, which arewell known in the art, for the reporter protein are performed. Forexample, if CAT were the reporter gene of choice, the lysates from cellstransfected with constructs containing CAT under the control of apromoter under study are mixed with isotopically labeled chloramphenicoland acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). The CAT enzyme transfers the acetylgroup from acetyl-CoA to the 2- or 3-position of chloramphenicol. Thereaction is monitored by thin-layer chromatography, which separatesacetylated chloramphenicol from unreacted material. The reactionproducts are then visualized by autoradiography.

The level of enzyme activity corresponds to the amount of enzyme thatwas made, which in turn reveals the level of expression from thepromoter of interest. This level of expression can be compared to otherpromoters to determine the relative strength of the promoter understudy. In order to be sure that the level of expression is determined bythe promoter, rather than by the stability of the mRNA, the level of thereporter mRNA can be measured directly, such as by Northern blotanalysis.

Once activity is detected, mutational and/or deletional analyses may beemployed to determine the minimal region and/or sequences required toinitiate transcription. Thus, sequences can be deleted at the 5′ end ofthe promoter region and/or at the 3′ end of the promoter region, andnucleotide substitutions introduced. These constructs are thenintroduced to cells and their activity determined.

In one embodiment, the promoter may be a gamma zein promoter, an oleosinole16 promoter, a globulins promoter, an actin I promoter, an actin clpromoter, a sucrose synthetase promoter, an INOPS promoter, an EXM5promoter, a globulin2 promoter, a b-32, ADPG-pyrophosphorylase promoter,an Ltpl promoter, an Ltp2 promoter, an oleosin ole17 promoter, anoleosin ole18 promoter, an actin 2 promoter, a pollen-specific proteinpromoter, a pollen-specific pectate lyase promoter, an anther-specificprotein promoter, an anther-specific gene RTS2 promoter, apollen-specific gene promoter, a tapeturn-specific gene promoter,tapeturn-specific gene RAB24 promoter, a anthranilate synthase alphasubunit promoter, an alpha zein promoter, an anthranilate synthase betasubunit promoter, a dihydrodipicolinate synthase promoter, a Thilpromoter, an alcohol dehydrogenase promoter, a cab binding proteinpromoter, an H3C4 promoter, a RUBISCO SS starch branching enzymepromoter, an ACCase promoter, an actin3 promoter, an actin7 promoter, aregulatory protein GF14-12 promoter, a ribosomal protein L9 promoter, acellulose biosynthetic enzyme promoter, an S-adenosyl-L-homocysteinehydrolase promoter, a superoxide dismutase promoter, a C-kinase receptorpromoter, a phosphoglycerate mutase promoter, a root-specific RCc3 mRNApromoter, a glucose-6 phosphate isomerase promoter, apyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphatelphosphotransferase promoter, anubiquitin promoter, a beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase promoter, a 33 kDaphotosystem 11 promoter, an oxygen evolving protein promoter, a 69 kDavacuolar ATPase subunit promoter, a metallothionein-like proteinpromoter, a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter, an ABA-and ripening-inducible-like protein promoter, a phenylalanine ammonialyase promoter, an adenosine triphosphatase S-adenosyl-L-homocysteinehydrolase promoter, an a-tubulin promoter, a cab promoter, a PEPCasepromoter, an R gene promoter, a lectin promoter, a light harvestingcomplex promoter, a heat shock protein promoter, a chalcone synthasepromoter, a zein promoter, a globulin-1 promoter, an ABA promoter, anauxin-binding protein promoter, a UDP glucose flavonoidglycosyl-transferase gene promoter, an NTI promoter, an actin promoter,an opaque 2 promoter, a b70 promoter, an oleosin promoter, a CaMV 35Spromoter, a CaMV 34S promoter, a CaMV 19S promoter, a histone promoter,a turgor-inducible promoter, a pea small subunit RuBP carboxylasepromoter, a Ti plasmid mannopine synthase promoter, Ti plasmid nopalinesynthase promoter, a petunia chalcone isomerase promoter, a bean glycinerich protein I promoter, a CaMV 35S transcript promoter, a potatopatatin promoter, or a S-E9 small subunit RuBP carboxylase promoter.

4. Transformed (Transgenic) Plants of the Invention and Methods ofPreparation

Plant species may be transformed with the DNA construct of the presentinvention by the DNA-mediated transformation of plant cell protoplastsand subsequent regeneration of the plant from the transformedprotoplasts in accordance with procedures well known in the art.

Any plant tissue capable of subsequent clonal propagation, whether byorganogenesis or embryogenesis, may be transformed with a vector of thepresent invention. The term “organogenesis,” as used herein, means aprocess by which shoots and roots are developed sequentially frommeristematic centers; the term “embryogenesis,” as used herein, means aprocess by which shoots and roots develop together in a concertedfashion (not sequentially), whether from somatic cells or gametes. Theparticular tissue chosen will vary depending on the clonal propagationsystems available for, and best suited to, the particular species beingtransformed. Exemplary tissue targets include leaf disks, pollen,embryos, cotyledons, hypocotyls, megagametophytes, callus tissue,existing meristematic tissue (e.g., apical meristems, axillary buds, androot meristems), and induced meristem tissue (e.g., cotyledon meristemand ultilane meristem).

Plants of the present invention may take a variety of forms. The plantsmay be chimeras of transformed cells and non-transformed cells; theplants may be clonal transformants (e.g., all cells transformed tocontain the expression cassette); the plants may comprise grafts oftransformed and untransformed tissues (e.g., a transformed root stockgrafted to an untransformed scion in citrus species). The transformedplants may be propagated by a variety of means, such as by clonalpropagation or classical breeding techniques. For example, firstgeneration (or T1) transformed plants may be selfed to give homozygoussecond generation (or T2) transformed plants, and the T2 plants furtherpropagated through classical breeding techniques. A dominant selectablemarker (such as npt II) can be associated with the expression cassetteto assist in breeding.

Thus, the present invention provides a transformed (transgenic) plantcell, in planta or ex planta, including a transformed plastid or otherorganelle, e.g., nucleus, mitochondria or chloroplast. The presentinvention may be used for transformation of any plant species,including, but not limited to, cells from the plant species specifiedabove in the DEFINITION section. Preferably, transgenic plants of thepresent invention are crop plants and in particular cereals (forexample, corn, alfalfa, sunflower, rice, Brassica, canola, soybean,barley, soybean, sugarbeet, cotton, safflower, peanut, sorghum, wheat,millet, tobacco, etc.), and even more preferably corn, rice and soybean.Other embodiments of the invention are related to cells, cell cultures,tissues, parts (such as plants organs, leaves, roots, etc.) andpropagation material (such as seeds) of such plants.

The transgenic expression cassette of the invention may not only becomprised in plants or plant cells but may advantageously also becontaining in other organisms such for example bacteria. Thus, anotherembodiment of the invention relates to transgenic cells or non-human,transgenic organisms comprising an expression cassette of the invention.Preferred are prokaryotic and eukaryotic organism. Both microorganismand higher organisms are comprised. Preferred microorganism arebacteria, yeast, algae, and fungi. Preferred bacteria are those of thegenus Escherichia, Erwinia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, Alcaligenes,Pseudomonas, Bacillus or Cyanobacterim such as—for example—Synechocystisand other bacteria described in Brock Biology of Microorganisms EighthEdition (pages A-8, A-9, A10 and A11).

Especially preferred are microorganisms capable to infect plants and totransfer DNA into their genome, especially bacteria of the genusAgrobacterium, preferably Agrobacterium tumefaciens and rhizogenes.Preferred yeasts are Candida, Saccharomyces, Hansenula and Pichia.Preferred Fungi are Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Ashbya, Neurospora,Fusarium, and Beauveria. Most preferred are plant organisms as definedabove.

Transformation of plants can be undertaken with a single DNA molecule ormultiple DNA molecules (i.e., co-transformation), and both thesetechniques are suitable for use with the expression cassettes of thepresent invention. Numerous transformation vectors are available forplant transformation, and the expression cassettes of this invention canbe used in conjunction with any such vectors. The selection of vectorwill depend upon the preferred transformation technique and the targetspecies for transformation.

A variety of techniques are available and known to those skilled in theart for introduction of constructs into a plant cell host. Thesetechniques generally include transformation with DNA employing A.tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes as the transforming agent, liposomes, PEGprecipitation, electroporation, DNA injection, direct DNA uptake,microprojectile bombardment, particle acceleration, and the like (See,for example, EP 295959 and EP 138341) (see below). However, cells otherthan plant cells may be transformed with the expression cassettes of theinvention. The general descriptions of plant expression vectors andreporter genes, and Agrobacterium and Agrobacterium-mediated genetransfer, can be found in Gruber et al. (1993).

Expression vectors containing genomic or synthetic fragments can beintroduced into protoplasts or into intact tissues or isolated cells.Preferably expression vectors are introduced into intact tissue. Generalmethods of culturing plant tissues are provided for example by Maki etal., (1993); and by Phillips et al. (1988). Preferably, expressionvectors are introduced into maize or other plant tissues using a directgene transfer method such as microprojectile-mediated delivery, DNAinjection, electroporation and the like. More preferably expressionvectors are introduced into plant tissues using the microprojectilemedia delivery with the biolistic device. See, for example, Tomes et al.(1995). The vectors of the invention can not only be used for expressionof structural genes but may also be used in exon-trap cloning, orpromoter trap procedures to detect differential gene expression invarieties of tissues (Lindsey 1993; Auch & Reth 1990).

It is particularly preferred to use the binary type vectors of Ti and Riplasmids of Agrobacterium spp. Ti-derived vectors transform a widevariety of higher plants, including monocotyledonous and dicotyledonousplants, such as soybean, cotton, rape, tobacco, and rice (Pacciotti1985: Byrne 1987; Sukhapinda 1987; Lorz 1985; Potrykus, 1985; Park 1985:Hiei 1994). The use of T-DNA to transform plant cells has receivedextensive study and is amply described (EP 120516; Hoekema, 1985; Knauf,1983; and An 1985). For introduction into plants, the chimeric genes ofthe invention can be inserted into binary vectors as described in theexamples.

Other transformation methods are available to those skilled in the art,such as direct uptake of foreign DNA constructs (see EP 295959),techniques of electroporation (Fromm 1986) or high velocity ballisticbombardment with metal particles coated with the nucleic acid constructs(Kline 1987, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050). Once transformed, the cellscan be regenerated by those skilled in the art. Of particular relevanceare the recently described methods to trans-form foreign genes intocommercially important crops, such as rapeseed (De Block 1989),sunflower (Everett 1987), soybean (McCabe 1988; Hinchee 1988; Chee 1989;Christou 1989; EP 301749), rice (Hiei 1994), and corn (Gordon-Kamm 1990;Fromm 1990).

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the choice of method mightdepend on the type of plant, i.e., monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous,targeted for transformation. Suitable methods of transforming plantcells include, but are not limited to, microinjection (Crossway 1986),electroporation (Riggs 1986), Agrobacterium-mediated transformation(Hinchee 1988), direct gene transfer (Paszkowski 1984), and ballisticparticle acceleration using devices available from Agracetus, Inc.,Madison, Wis. And BioRad, Hercules, Calif. (see, for example, U.S. Pat.No. 4,945,050; and McCabe 1988). Also see, Weissinger 1988; Sanford 1987(onion); Christou 1988 (soybean); McCabe 1988 (soybean); Datta 1990(rice); Klein 1988 (maize); Klein 1988 (maize); Klein 1988 (maize);Fromm 1990 (maize); and Gordon-Kamm 1990 (maize); Svab 1990 (tobaccochloroplast); Koziel 1993 (maize); Shimamoto 1989 (rice); Christou 1991(rice); European Patent Application EP 0 332 581 (orchardgrass and otherPooideae); Vasil 1993 (wheat); Weeks 1993 (wheat).

In another embodiment, a nucleotide sequence of the present invention isdirectly transformed into the plastid genome. Plastid transformationtechnology is extensively described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,451,513,5,545,817, and 5,545,818, in PCT application no. WO 95/16783, and inMcBride et al., 1994. The basic technique for chloroplast transformationinvolves introducing regions of cloned plastid DNA flanking a selectablemarker together with the gene of interest into a suitable target tissue,e.g., using biolistics or protoplast transformation (e.g., calciumchloride or PEG mediated transformation). The 1 to 1.5 kb flankingregions, termed targeting sequences, facilitate orthologousrecombination with the plastid genome and thus allow the replacement ormodification of specific regions of the plastome. Initially, pointmutations in the chloroplast 16S rRNA and rps12 genes conferringresistance to spectinomycin and/or streptomycin are utilized asselectable markers for transformation (Svab 1990; Staub 1992). Thisresulted in stable homoplasmic transformants at a frequency ofapproximately one per 100 bombardments of target leaves. The presence ofcloning sites between these markers allowed creation of a plastidtargeting vector for introduction of foreign genes (Staub 1993).Substantial increases in transformation frequency are obtained byreplacement of the recessive rRNA or r-protein antibiotic resistancegenes with a dominant selectable marker, the bacterial aadA geneencoding the spectinomycin-detoxifying enzymeaminoglycoside-3N-adenyltransferase (Svab 1993). Other selectablemarkers useful for plastid transformation are known in the art andencompassed within the scope of the invention. Typically, approximately15-20 cell division cycles following transformation are required toreach a homoplastidic state. Plastid expression, in which genes areinserted by orthologous recombination into all of the several thousandcopies of the circular plastid genome present in each plant cell, takesadvantage of the enormous copy number advantage over nuclear-expressedgenes to permit expression levels that can readily exceed 10% of thetotal soluble plant protein. In a preferred embodiment, a nucleotidesequence of the present invention is inserted into a plastid targetingvector and transformed into the plastid genome of a desired plant host.Plants homoplastic for plastid genomes containing a nucleotide sequenceof the present invention are obtained, and are preferentially capable ofhigh expression of the nucleotide sequence.

Agrobacterium fumefaciens cells containing a vector comprising anexpression cassette of the present invention, wherein the vectorcomprises a Ti plasmid, are useful in methods of making transformedplants. Plant cells are infected with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens asdescribed above to produce a transformed plant cell, and then a plant isregenerated from the transformed plant cell. Numerous Agrobacteriumvector systems useful in carrying out the present invention are known.

Various Agrobacterium strains can be employed, preferably disarmedAgrobacterium tumefaciens or rhizogenes strains. In a preferredembodiment, Agrobacterium strains for use in the practice of theinvention include octopine strains, e.g., LBA4404 or agropine strains,e.g., EHA101 or EHA105. Suitable strains of A. fumefaciens for DNAtransfer are for example EHA101[pEHA101] (Hood 1986), EHA105[pEHA105](Li 1992), LBA4404[pAL4404] (Hoekema 1983), C58C1[pMP90] (Koncz & Schell1986), and C58C1[pGV2260 (Deblaere 1985). Other suitable strains areAgrobacterium tumefaciens C58, a nopaline strain. Other suitable strainsare A. tumefaciens C58C1 (Van Larebeke 1974), A136 (Watson 1975) orLBA4011 (Kiapwijk 1980). In another preferred embodiment the soil-bornebacterium is a disarmed variant of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain K599(NCPPB 2659). Preferably, these strains are comprising a disarmedplasmid variant of a Ti- or Ri-plasmid providing the functions requiredfor T-DNA transfer into plant cells (e.g., the vir genes). In apreferred embodiment, the Agrobacterium strain used to transform theplant tissue pre-cultured with the plant phenolic compound contains aL,L-succinamopine type Ti-plasmid, preferably disarmed, such as pEHA101.In another preferred embodiment, the Agrobacterium strain used totransform the plant tissue pre-cultured with the plant phenolic compoundcontains an octopine-type Ti-plasmid, preferably disarmed, such aspAL4404. Generally, when using octopine-type Ti-plasmids or helperplasmids, it is preferred that the virF gene be deleted or inactivated(Jarschow 1991).

The method of the invention can also be used in combination withparticular Agrobacterium strains, to further increase the transformationefficiency, such as Agrobacterium strains wherein the vir geneexpression and/or induction thereof is altered due to the presence ofmutant or chimeric virA or virG genes (e.g. Hansen 1994; Chen and Winans1991; Scheeren-Groot, 1994). Preferred are further combinations ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 (Hiei 1994) with super-virulentplasmids. These are preferably pTOK246-based vectors (Ishida 1996).

A binary vector or any other vector can be modified by common DNArecombination techniques, multiplied in E. coli, and introduced intoAgrobacterium by e.g. electroporation or other transformation techniques(Mozo & Hooykaas 1991).

Agrobacterium is grown and used in a manner similar to that described inIshida (1996). The vector comprising Agrobacterium strain may, forexample, be grown for 3 days on YP medium (5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/lpeptone, 5 g/l NaCl, 15 g/l agar, pH 6.8) supplemented with theappropriate antibiotic (e.g., 50 mg/l spectinomycin). Bacteria arecollected with a loop from the solid medium and resuspended. In apreferred embodiment of the invention, Agrobacterium cultures arestarted by use of aliquots frozen at −80° C.

The transformation of the immature embryos by the Agrobacterium may becarried out by merely contacting the immature embryos with theAgrobacterium. The concentration of Agrobacterium used for infection andco-cultivation may need to be varied. For example, a cell suspension ofthe Agrobacterium having a population density of approximately from10⁵-10¹¹, preferably 10⁶ to 10¹⁰, more preferably about 10⁸ cells orcfu/ml is prepared and the immature embryos are immersed in thissuspension for about 3 to 10 minutes. The resulting immature embryos arethen cultured on a solid medium for several days together with theAgrobacterium.

Preferably, the bacterium is employed in concentration of 10⁶ to 10¹⁰cfu/mi. In a preferred embodiment for the co-cultivation step about 1 to10 μl of a suspension of the soil-borne bacterium (e.g., Agrobacteria)in the co-cultivation medium are directly applied to each embryo andair-dried. This is saving labor and time and is reducing unintendedAgrobacterium-mediated damage by excess Agrobacterium usage.

For Agrobacterium treatment of isolated immature embryos, the bacteriaare resuspended in a plant compatible co-cultivation medium.Supplementation of the co-culture medium with antioxidants (e.g., silvernitrate), phenol-absorbing compounds (like polyvinylpyrrolidone, Perl1996) or thiol compounds (e.g., dithiothreitol, L-cysteine, Olhoft 2001)which can decrease tissue necrosis due to plant defence responses (likephenolic oxidation) may further improve the efficiency ofAgrobacterium-mediated transformation. In another preferred embodiment,the co-cultivation medium of comprises least one thiol compound,preferably selected from the group consisting of sodium thiolsulfate,dithiotrietol (DTT) and cysteine. Preferably the concentration isbetween about 1 mM and 10 mM of L-Cysteine, 0.1 mM to 5 mM DTT, and/or0.1 mM to 5 mM sodium thiolsulfate. Preferably, the medium employedduring co-cultivation comprises from about 1 μM to about 10 μM of silvernitrate and from about 50 mg/L to about 1,000 mg/L of L-Cystein. Thisresults in a highly reduced vulnerability of the immature embryo againstAgrobacterium-mediated damage (such as induced necrosis) and highlyimproves overall transformation efficiency.

Various vector systems can be used in combination with Agrobacteria.Preferred are binary vector systems. Common binary vectors are based on“broad host range”-plasmids like pRK252 (Bevan 1984) or pTJS75 (Watson1985) derived from the P-type plasmid RK2. Most of these vectors arederivatives of pBIN19 (Bevan 1984). Various binary vectors are known,some of which are commercially available such as, for example, pBI101.2or pBIN19 (Clontech Laboratories, Inc. USA). Additional vectors wereimproved with regard to size and handling (e.g. pPZP; Hajdukiewicz1994). Improved vector systems are described also in WO 02/00900.

Methods using either a form of direct gene transfer orAgrobacterium-mediated transfer usually, but not necessarily, areundertaken with a selectable marker which may provide resistance to anantibiotic (e.g., kanamycin, hygromycin or methotrexate) or a herbicide(e.g., phosphinothricin). The choice of selectable marker for planttransformation is not, however, critical to the invention.

For certain plant species, different antibiotic or herbicide selectionmarkers may be preferred. Selection markers used routinely intransformation include the nptII gene which confers resistance tokanamycin and related antibiotics (Messing & Vierra, 1982; Bevan 1983),the bar gene which confers resistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin(White 1990, Spencer 1990), the hph gene which confers resistance to theantibiotic hygromycin (Blochlinger & Diggelmann), and the dhfr gene,which confers resistance to methotrexate (Bourouis 1983).

5. Production and Characterization of Stably Transformed Plants

Transgenic plant cells are then placed in an appropriate selectivemedium for selection of transgenic cells which are then grown to callus.Shoots are grown from callus and plantlets generated from the shoot bygrowing in rooting medium. The various constructs normally will bejoined to a marker for selection in plant cells. Conveniently, themarker may be resistance to a biocide (particularly an antibiotic, suchas kanamycin, G418, bleomycin, hygromycin, chloramphenicol, herbicide,or the like). The particular marker used will allow for selection oftransformed cells as compared to cells lacking the DNA which has beenintroduced. Components of DNA constructs including transcriptioncassettes of this invention may be prepared from sequences which arenative (endogenous) or foreign (exogenous) to the host. By “foreign” itis meant that the sequence is not found in the wild-type host into whichthe construct is introduced. Heterologous constructs will contain atleast one region which is not native to the gene from which thetranscription-initiation-region is derived.

To confirm the presence of the transgenes in transgenic cells andplants, a variety of assays may be performed. Such assays include, forexample, “molecular biological” assays well known to those of skill inthe art, such as Southern and Northern blotting, in situ hybridizationand nucleic acid-based amplification methods such as PCR or RT-PCR;“biochemical” assays, such as detecting the presence of a proteinproduct, e.g., by immunological means (ELISAs and Western blots) or byenzymatic function; plant part assays, such as seed assays; and also, byanalyzing the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant, e.g., fordisease or pest resistance.

DNA may be isolated from cell lines or any plant parts to determine thepresence of the preselected nucleic acid segment through the use oftechniques well known to those skilled in the art. Note that intactsequences will not always be present, presumably due to rearrangement ordeletion of sequences in the cell.

The presence of nucleic acid elements introduced through the methods ofthis invention may be determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Using this technique discreet fragments of nucleic acid are amplifiedand detected by gel electrophoresis. This type of analysis permits oneto determine whether a preselected nucleic acid segment is present in astable transformant, but does not prove integration of the introducedpreselected nucleic acid segment into the host cell genome. In addition,it is not possible using PCR techniques to determine whethertransformants have exogenous genes introduced into different sites inthe, genome, i.e., whether transformants are of independent origin. Itis contemplated that using PCR techniques it would be possible to clonefragments of the host genomic DNA adjacent to an introduced preselectedDNA segment.

Positive proof of DNA integration into the host genome and theindependent identities of transformants may be determined using thetechnique of Southern hybridization. Using this technique specific DNAsequences that were introduced into the host genome and flanking hostDNA sequences can be identified. Hence the Southern hybridizationpattern of a given transformant serves as an identifying characteristicof that transformant. In addition it is possible through Southernhybridization to demonstrate the presence of introduced preselected DNAsegments in high molecular weight DNA, i.e., confirm that the introducedpreselected DNA segment has been integrated into the host cell genome.The technique of Southern hybridization provides information that isobtained using PCR, e.g., the presence of a preselected DNA segment, butalso demonstrates integration into the genome and characterizes eachindividual transformant.

It is contemplated that using the techniques of dot or slot blothybridization which are modifications of Southern hybridizationtechniques one could obtain the same information that is derived fromPCR, e.g., the presence of a preselected DNA segment.

Both PCR and Southern hybridization techniques can be used todemonstrate trans-mission of a preselected DNA segment to progeny. Inmost instances the characteristic Southern hybridization pattern for agiven transformant will segregate in progeny as one or more Mendeliangenes (Spencer 1992); Laursen 1994) indicating stable inheritance of thegene. The non-chimeric nature of the callus and the parentaltransformants (R₀) was suggested by germline transmission and theidentical Southern blot hybridization patterns and intensities of thetransforming DNA in callus, R₀ plants and R₁ progeny that segregated forthe transformed gene.

Whereas DNA analysis techniques may be conducted using DNA isolated fromany part of a plant, RNA may only be expressed in particular cells ortissue types and hence it will be necessary to prepare RNA for analysisfrom these tissues. PCR techniques may also be used for detection andquantitation of RNA produced from introduced preselected DNA segments.In this application of PCR it is first necessary to reverse transcribeRNA into DNA, using enzymes such as reverse transcriptase, and thenthrough the use of conventional PCR techniques amplify the DNA. In mostinstances PCR techniques, while useful, will not demonstrate integrityof the RNA product. Further information about the nature of the RNAproduct may be obtained by Northern blotting. This technique willdemonstrate the presence of an RNA species and give information aboutthe integrity of that RNA. The presence or absence of an RNA species canalso be determined using dot or slot blot Northern hybridizations. Thesetechniques are modifications of Northern blotting and will onlydemonstrate the presence or absence of an RNA species.

While Southern blotting and PCR may be used to detect the preselectedDNA segment in question, they do not provide information as to whetherthe preselected DNA segment is being expressed. Expression may beevaluated by specifically identifying the protein products of theintroduced preselected DNA segments or evaluating the phenotypic changesbrought about by their expression.

Assays for the production and identification of specific proteins maymake use of physical-chemical, structural, functional, or otherproperties of the proteins. Unique physical-chemical or structuralproperties allow the proteins to be separated and identified byelectrophoretic procedures, such as native or denaturing gelelectrophoresis or isoelectric focusing, or by chromatographictechniques such as ion exchange or gel exclusion chromatography. Theunique structures of individual proteins offer opportunities for use ofspecific antibodies to detect their presence in formats such as an ELISAassay. Combinations of approaches may be employed with even greaterspecificity such as Western blotting in which antibodies are used tolocate individual gene products that have been separated byelectrophoretic techniques. Additional techniques may be employed toabsolutely confirm the identity of the product of interest such asevaluation by amino acid sequencing following purification. Althoughthese are among the most commonly employed, other procedures may beadditionally used.

Assay procedures may also be used to identify the expression of proteinsby their functionality, especially the ability of enzymes to catalyzespecific chemical reactions involving specific substrates and products.These reactions may be followed by providing and quantifying the loss ofsubstrates or the generation of products of the reactions by physical orchemical procedures. Examples are as varied as the enzyme to beanalyzed.

Very frequently the expression of a gene product is determined byevaluating the phenotypic results of its expression. These assays alsomay take many forms including but not limited to analyzing changes inthe chemical composition, morphology, or physiological properties of theplant. Morphological changes may include greater stature or thickerstalks. Most often changes in response of plants or plant parts toimposed treatments are evaluated under carefully controlled conditionstermed bioassays.

6. Uses of Transgenic Plants

Once an expression cassette of the invention has been transformed into aparticular plant species, it may be propagated in that species or movedinto other varieties of the same species, particularly includingcommercial varieties, using traditional breeding techniques.Particularly preferred plants of the invention include the agronomicallyimportant crops listed above. The genetic properties engineered into thetransgenic seeds and plants described above are passed on by sexualreproduction and can thus be maintained and propagated in progenyplants. The present invention also relates to a transgenic plant cell,tissue, organ, seed or plant part obtained from the transgenic plant.Also included within the invention are transgenic descendants of theplant as well as transgenic plant cells, tissues, organs, seeds andplant parts obtained from the descendants.

Preferably, the expression cassette in the transgenic plant is sexuallytransmitted. In one preferred embodiment, the coding sequence issexually transmitted through a complete normal sexual cycle of the R0plant to the R1 generation. Additionally preferred, the expressioncassette is expressed in the cells, tissues, seeds or plant of atransgenic plant in an amount that is different than the amount in thecells, tissues, seeds or plant of a plant which only differs in that theexpression cassette is absent.

The transgenic plants produced herein are thus expected to be useful fora variety of commercial and research purposes. Transgenic plants can becreated for use in traditional agriculture to possess traits beneficialto the grower (e.g., agronomic traits such as resistance to waterdeficit, pest resistance, herbicide resistance or increased yield),beneficial to the consumer of the grain harvested from the plant (e.g.,improved nutritive content in human food or animal feed; increasedvitamin, amino acid, and antioxidant content; the production ofanti-bodies (passive immunization) and nutriceuticals), or beneficial tothe food processor (e.g., improved processing traits). In such uses, theplants are generally grown for the use of their grain in human or animalfoods. Additionally, the use of root-specific promoters in transgenicplants can provide beneficial traits that are localized in theconsumable (by animals and humans) roots of plants such as carrots,parsnips, and beets. However, other parts of the plants, includingstalks, husks, vegetative parts, and the like, may also have utility,including use as part of animal silage or for ornamental purposes.Often, chemical constituents (e.g., oils or starches) of maize and othercrops are extracted for foods or industrial use and transgenic plantsmay be created which have enhanced or modified levels of suchcomponents.

Transgenic plants may also find use in the commercial manufacture ofproteins or other molecules, where the molecule of interest is extractedor purified from plant parts, seeds, and the like. Cells or tissue fromthe plants may also be cultured, grown in vitro, or fermented tomanufacture such molecules. The transgenic plants may also be used incommercial breeding programs, or may be crossed or bred to plants ofrelated crop species. Improvements encoded by the expression cassettemay be transferred, e.g., from maize cells to cells of other species,e.g., by protoplast fusion.

The transgenic plants may have many uses in research or breeding,including creation of new mutant plants through insertional mutagenesis,in order to identify beneficial mutants that might later be created bytraditional mutation and selection. An example would be the introductionof a recombinant DNA sequence encoding a transposable element that maybe used for generating genetic variation. The methods of the inventionmay also be used to create plants having unique “signature sequences” orother marker sequences which can be used to identify proprietary linesor varieties.

Thus, the transgenic plants and seeds according to the invention can beused in plant breeding which aims at the development of plants withimproved properties conferred by the expression cassette, such astolerance of drought, disease, or other stresses. The various breedingsteps are characterized by well-defined human intervention such asselecting the lines to be crossed, directing pollination of the parentallines, or selecting appropriate descendant plants. Depending on thedesired properties different breeding measures are taken. The relevanttechniques are well known in the art and include but are not limited tohybridization inbreeding, backcross breeding, multilane breeding,variety blend, interspecific hybridization, aneuploid techniques, etc.Hybridization techniques also include the sterilization of plants toyield male or female sterile plants by mechanical, chemical orbiochemical means. Cross pollination of a male sterile plant with pollenof a different line assures that the genome of the male sterile butfemale fertile plant will uniformly obtain properties of both parentallines. Thus, the transgenic seeds and plants according to the inventioncan be used for the breeding of improved plant lines which for exampleincrease the effectiveness of conventional methods such as herbicide orpesticide treatment or allow to dispense with said methods due to theirmodified genetic properties. Alternatively new crops with improvedstress tolerance can be obtained which, due to their optimized genetic“equipment”, yield harvested product of better quality than productswhich were not able to tolerate comparable adverse developmentalconditions.

EXAMPLES Materials and General Methods

Unless indicated otherwise, chemicals and reagents in the Examples wereobtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, Mo.), restrictionendonucleases were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.) or Roche(Indianapolis, Ind.), oligonucleotides were synthesized by MWG BiotechInc. (High Point, N.C.), and other modifying enzymes or kits regardingbiochemicals and molecular biological assays were from Clontech (PaloAlto, Calif.), Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, N.J.), Promega Corporation(Madison, Wis.), or Stratagene (La Jolla, Calif.). Materials for cellculture media were obtained from Gibco/BRL (Gaithersburg, Md.) or DIFCO(Detroit, Mi). The cloning steps carried out for the purposes of thepresent invention, such as, for example, restriction cleavages, agarosegel electrophoresis, purification of DNA fragments, transfer of nucleicacids to nitrocellulose and nylon membranes, linking DNA fragments,trans-formation of E. coli cells, growing bacteria, multiplying phagesand sequence analysis of recombinant DNA, are carried out as describedby Sambrook (1989). The sequencing of recombinant DNA molecules iscarried out using ABI laser fluorescence DNA sequencer following themethod of Sanger (Sanger 1977).

For generating transgenic Arabidopsis plants Agrobacterium tumefaciens(strain C58C1[pMP90]) is transformed with the various promoter::GUSvector constructs (see below). Resulting Agrobacterium strains aresubsequently employed to obtain transgenic plants. For this purpose aisolated transformed Agrobacterium colony is incubated in 4 ml culture(Medium: YEB medium with 50 μg/ml Kanamycin and 25 μg/ml Rifampicin)over night at 28° C. With this culture a 400 ml culture of the samemedium is inoculated and incubated over night (28° C., 220 rpm). Thebacteria a precipitated by centrifugation (GSA-Rotor, 8,000 U/min, 20min) and the pellet is resuspended in infiltration medium (1/2MS-Medium; 0.5 g/l MES, pH 5.8; 50 g/l sucrose). The suspension isplaced in a plant box (Duchefa) and 100 ml SILVET L-77 (Osi Special-tiesInc/, Cat. P030196) are added to a final concentration of 0.02%. Theplant box with 8 to 12 Plants is placed into an exsiccator for 10 to 15min. under vacuum with subsequent, spontaneous ventilation (expansion).This process is repeated 2-3 times. Thereafter all plants aretransferred into pods with wet-soil and grown under long daytimeconditions (16 h light; day temperature 22-24° C., night temperature 19°C.; 65% rel. humidity). Seeds are harvested after 6 weeks.

Example 1 Growth Conditions for Plants for Tissue-Specific ExpressionAnalysis

To obtain 4 and 7 days old seedlings, about 400 seeds (Arabidopsisthaliana ecotype Columbia) are sterilized with a 80% (v/v) ethanol:watersolution for 2 minutes, treated with a sodium hypochlorite solution(0.5% v/v) for 5 minutes, washed three times with distillated water andincubated at 4° C. for 4 days to ensure a standardized germination.Subsequently, seeds are incubated on Petri dishes with MS medium (SigmaM5519) supplemented with 1% sucrose, 0.5 g/l MES (Sigma M8652), 0.8%Difco-BactoAgar (Difco 0140-01), adjusted to pH 5.7. The seedlings aregrown under 16 h light/8 h dark cyklus (Philips 58 W/33 white light) at22° C. and harvested after 4 or 7 days, respectively.

To obtain root tissue, 100 seeds are sterilized as described above,incubated at 4° C. for 4 days, and transferred into 250 ml flasks withMS medium (Sigma M5519) supplemented with additional 3% sucrose and 0.5g/l MES (Sigma M8652), adjusted to pH 5.7 for further growing. Theseedlings are grown at a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle (Philips 58 W/33white light) at 22° C. and 120 rpm and harvested after 3 weeks. For allother plant organs employed, seeds are sown on standard soil (Type VM,Manna-Italia, Via S. Giacomo 42, 39050 San Giacomo/Laives, Bolzano,Italien), incubated for 4 days at 4° C. to ensure uniform germination,and subsequently grown under a 16 h light/8 darkness regime (OSRAMLumi-lux Daylight 36W/12) at 22° C. Young rosette leaves are harvestedat the 8-leaf stage (after about 3 weeks), mature rosette leaves areharvested after 8 weeks briefly before stem formation. Apices ofout-shooting stems are harvested briefly after out-shooting, Stem, stemleaves, and flower buds are harvested in development stage 12 (Bowmann J(ed.), Arabidopsis, Atlas of Morphology, Springer New York, 1995) priorto stamen development. Open flowers are harvested in development stage14 immediately after stamen development. Wilting flowers are harvestedin stage 15 to 16. Green and yellow shoots used for the analysis have alength of 10 to 13 mm.

Example 2 Demonstration of Expression Profile

To demonstrate and analyze the transcription regulating properties of apromoter of the useful to operably link the promoter or its fragments toa reporter gene, which can be employed to monitor its expression bothqualitatively and quantitatively. Preferably bacterial β-glucuronidaseis used (Jefferson 1987). β-glucuronidase activity can be monitored inplanta with chromogenic substrates such as5-bromo-4-Chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid during correspondingactivity assays (Jefferson 1987). For determination of promoter activityand tissue specificity plant tissue is dissected, embedded, stained andanalyzed as described (e.g., Bäumlein 1991).

For quantitative β-glucuronidase activity analysis MUG(methylumbelliferyl glucuronide) is used as a substrate, which isconverted into MU (methylumbelliferone) and glucuronic acid. Underalkaline conditions this conversion can be quantitatively monitoredfluorometrically (excitation at 365 nm, measurement at 455 nm;SpectroFluorimeter Thermo Life Sciences Fluoroscan) as described (Bustos1989).

Example 3 Cloning of the Promoter Fragments

To isolate the promoter fragments described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7,8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35,36, 37, 40, 41, and 42, genomic DNA is isolated from Arabidopsisthaliana (ecotype Columbia) as described (Galbiati 2000). The isolatedgenomic DNA is employed as matrix DNA for a polymerase chain reaction(PCR) mediated amplification using the oligonucleotide primers andprotocols indicated below (Table 3).

TABLE 3 PCR conditions and oligonucleotide primers for amplification ofthe various transcription regulating sequences Forward Reverse SEQ IDPromoter Primer Primer Restriction enzymes SEQ ID NO: 1 pSUK320 UH320forUH320rev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 45 SEQ ID NO: 46 SEQ ID NO: 2 pSUH320LUH320for UH320Lrev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 45 SEQ ID NO: 47 SEQ ID NO: 3pSUH320S UH320for UH320Srev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 45 SEQ ID NO: 48 SEQID NO: 4 pSUK320GB UH320for UH320rev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 45 SEQ ID NO:46 SEQ ID NO: 7 pSUH335L UH335for UH335rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 49 SEQID NO: 50 SEQ ID NO: 8 pSUH335S UH335for UH335Srev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO:49 SEQ ID NO: 51 SEQ ID NO: 9 pSUH335GB UH335for UH335rev BamHI/NcoI SEQID NO: 49 SEQ ID NO: 50 SEQ ID NO: 10 pSUH338 UH338for UH335revBamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 52 SEQ ID NO: 50 SEQ ID NO: 11 pSUH338GB UH338forUH335rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 52 SEQ ID NO: 50 SEQ ID NO: 14 pSUH307UH307for UH307rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 53 SEQ ID NO: 54 SEQ ID NO: 15pSUH307S UH307for UH307Srev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 53 SEQ ID NO: 55 SEQID NO: 16 pSUH307GB UH307for UH307rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 53 SEQ IDNO: 54 SEQ ID NO: 19 pSUH319 UH319for UH319rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 56SEQ ID NO: 57 SEQ ID NO: 20 pSUH319S UH319for UH319Srev BamHI/NcoI SEQID NO: 56 SEQ ID NO: 58 SEQ ID NO: 21 pSUH319GB UH319for UH319revBamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 56 SEQ ID NO: 57 SEQ ID NO: 24 pSUH349 UH349forUH349rev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 59 SEQ ID NO: 60 SEQ ID NO: 25 pSUH349SUH349for UH349Srev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 59 SEQ ID NO: 61 SEQ ID NO: 26pSUH349GB UH349for UH349rev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 59 SEQ ID NO: 60 SEQID NO: 29 pSUH372 UH372for UH372rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 62 SEQ ID NO:63 SEQ ID NO: 30 pSUH372S UH372for UH372Srev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 62SEQ ID NO: 64 SEQ ID NO: 31 pSUH372GB UH372for UH372rev BamHI/NcoI SEQID NO: 62 SEQ ID NO: 63 SEQ ID NO: 34 pSUH378 UH378for UH378revBamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 65 SEQ ID NO: 66 SEQ ID NO: 35 pSUH378GB UH378forUH378rev BamHI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 65 SEQ ID NO: 66 SEQ ID NO: 36 pSUH382UH378for UH378rev EcoRI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 65 SEQ ID NO: 66 SEQ ID NO: 37pSUH382GB UH378for UH378rev EcoRI/NcoI SEQ ID NO: 65 SEQ ID NO: 66 SEQID NO: 40 pSUH379 UH379for UH379rev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 67 SEQ ID NO:68 SEQ ID NO: 41 pSUH379S UH379for UH379Srev XhoI/BamHI SEQ ID NO: 67SEQ ID NO: 69 SEQ ID NO: 42 pSUH379GB UH379for UH379rev XhoI/BamHI SEQID NO: 67 SEQ ID NO: 68

Amplification is carried out as follows:

100 ng genomic DNA1×PCR buffer

2.5 mM MgCl2,

200 μM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP und dTTP10 pmol of each oligonucleotide primers

2.5 Units Pfu DNA Polymerase (Stratagene)

in a final volume of 50 μl

The following temperature program is employed for the variousamplifications (BIO-RAD Thermocycler). The annealing temperature (Ta) isspecific for the primer pairs and given in the Table above.

1. 95° C. for 5 min

2. 54° C. for 1 min, followed by 72° C. for 5 min and 95° C. for 30 sec.Repeated 25 times3. 54° C. for 1 min, followed by 72° C. for 10 min.

4. Storage at 4° C.

The resulting PCR-products are digested with the restrictionendonucleases specified in the Table above and cloned into the vectorpSUN0301 (SEQ ID NO: 68) (pre-digested with the same enzymes) upstreamand in operable linkage to the glucuronidase (GUS) gene. Followingstable transformation of each of these constructs into Arabidopsisthaliana tissue specificity and expression profile was analyzed by ahistochemical and quantitative GUS-assay, respectively.

Example 4 Expression Profile of the Various Promoter::GUS Constructs inStably Transformed A. thaliana Plants

4.1 pSUH320, pSUH320S, pSUH320L and pSUH320 GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At1g66280 confer a strong andhighly specific expression in roots and in particular in vascularbundles. No expression is observed in root tips, root epidermis and inall other tissues analyzed (seedlings, leaves, stem, flowers, shoots,seeds).

4.2 pSUH335S, pSUH335L, pSUH33SGB, pSUH338, and pSUH338GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At1g74500 confer a medium tostrong and highly specific expression in roots and in particular in roottips and growing roots. No expression is observed in all other tissuesanalyzed (seedlings, leaves, stem, flowers, shoots, seeds).

4.3 pSUH307, pSUH307S and pSUH307GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At1g49570 demonstrate anextraordinary strong and uniform expression in roots except root tips ofseedlings and adult plants. During flower development weak sideactivities are observed in flower buds and immature anthers.

4.4 pSUH349, pSUH349S and pSUH349 GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At5g66690 confer a very strongexpression in growing roots. There are weak side activities in youngflower buds and sometimes in stems.

4.5 pSUH372, pSUH372S and pSUH372 GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At3g26930 drive preferentiallyexpression in roots. Expression in roots is very strong except in roottips. Weak side activities are seen in vascular tissues of siliques,leaves, stems and seed coats.

4.6 pSUH378, pSUH378 GB, pSUH382 and pSUH382 GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At5g48070 drive preferentiallyexpression in roots. Expression in roots is medium to strong and mainlylocalized in central cylinder. Weak side activities are seen in tips andbasis of young siliques as well as in vascular tissue of leaves andstems.

4.7 pSUH319, pSUH319S and pSUH319GB

The promoter sequences derived from gene At1g70710 drive preferentiallyexpression in roots. The medium expression is mainly localized incentral cylinder of roots. There are side activities in stem, siliques,seeds as well as in guard cells of leaves.

4.8 pSUH379

The promoter sequences derived from gene At4g17800 drive preferentiallyexpression in roots. Expression in roots is uniform with medium strengthexcept in root tips of adult plants. Weak side activities are observedin leaf tips, stamen and trichomes.

Example 5 Vector Construction for Overexpression and Gene “Knockout”Experiments 5.1 Overexpression

Vectors used for expression of full-length “candidate genes” of interestin plants (overexpression) are designed to overexpress the protein ofinterest and are of two general types, biolistic and binary, dependingon the plant transformation method to be used.

For biolistic transformation (biolistic vectors), the requirements areas follows:

-   1. a backbone with a bacterial selectable marker (typically, an    antibiotic resistance gene) and origin of replication functional in    Escherichia coli (E. coli; e.g., ColE1), and-   2. a plant-specific portion consisting of:    -   a. a gene expression cassette consisting of a promoter (eg.        ZmUBlint MOD), the gene of interest (typically, a full-length        cDNA) and a transcriptional terminator (e.g., Agrobacterium        tumefaciens nos terminator);    -   b. a plant selectable marker cassette, consisting of a suitable        promoter, selectable marker gene (e.g., D-amino acid oxidase;        daol) and transcriptional terminator (e.g. nos terminator).

Vectors designed for transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A.tumefaciens; binary vectors) consist of:

-   1. a backbone with a bacterial selectable marker functional in    both E. coli and A. tumefaciens (e.g., spectinomycin resistance    mediated by the aadA gene) and two origins of replication,    functional in each of aforementioned bacterial hosts, plus the A.    tumefaciens virG gene;-   2. a plant-specific portion as described for biolistic vectors    above, except in this instance this portion is flanked by A.    tumefaciens right and left border sequences which mediate transfer    of the DNA flanked by these two sequences to the plant.

5.2 Gene Silencing Vectors

Vectors designed for reducing or abolishing expression of a single geneor of a family or related genes (gene silencing vectors) are also of twogeneral types corresponding to the methodology used to downregulate geneexpression: antisense or double-stranded RNA interference (dsRNAi).

(a) Anti-Sense

For antisense vectors, a full-length or partial gene fragment(typically, a portion of the cDNA) can be used in the same vectorsdescribed for full-length expression, as part of the gene expressioncassette. For antisense-mediated down-regulation of gene expression, thecoding region of the gene or gene fragment will be in the oppositeorientation relative to the promoter; thus, mRNA will be made from thenon-coding (antisense) strand in planta.

(b) dsRNAi

For dsRNAi vectors, a partial gene fragment (typically, 300 to 500basepairs long) is used in the gene expression cassette, and isexpressed in both the sense and antisense orientations, separated by aspacer region (typically, a plant intron, e.g. the OsSH1 intron 1, or aselectable marker, e.g. conferring kanamycin resistance). Vectors ofthis type are designed to form a double-stranded mRNA stem, resultingfrom the basepairing of the two complementary gene fragments in plants.

Biolistic or binary vectors designed for overexpression or knockout canvary in a number of different ways, including e.g. the selectablemarkers used in plant and bacteria, the transcriptional terminators usedin the gene expression and plant selectable marker cassettes and themethodologies used for cloning in gene or gene fragments of interest(typically, conventional restriction enzyme-mediated or Gateway™recombinase-based cloning).

REFERENCES

-   1. Abel et al., Science, 232:738 (1986).-   2. Altschul et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 25:3389 (1997).-   3. Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol, 215:403 (1990).-   4. An et al., EMBO J., 4:277 (1985).-   5. Auch & Reth, Nucleic Acids Research, 18:6743 (1990).-   6. Ausubel et al. (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,    Greene Publishing Assoc. and Wiley Interscience-   7. Ballas et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 17:7891 (1989).-   8. Barkai-Golan et al., Arch. Microbiol., 116:119 (1978).-   9. Batzer et al., Nucleic Acid Res., 19:5081 (1991).-   10. Bäumlein et al. Mol Gen Genet. 225:121-128 (1991)-   11. Becker et al. (1994) Plant J., 5:299-307,-   12. Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, Plant Physiol., 98:1207 (1992).-   13. Bevan et al., Nature, 304:184 (1983).-   14. Bevan et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 11:369 (1983).-   15. Bevan, Nucl. Acids Res., 12:8711 (1984).-   16. Blackman et al., Plant Physiol., 100:225 (1992).-   17. Blochlinger & Diggelmann, Mol Cell Biol, 4:2929 (1984).-   18. Bol et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopath., 28:113 (1990).-   19. Bouchez et al., EMBO J., 8:4197 (1989).-   20. Bourouis et al., EMBO J., 2:1099 (1983).-   21. Bowler et al., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 43:83 (1992).-   22. Branson and Guss, Proc. North Central Branch Entomological    Society of America (1972).-   23. Broakgert et al., Science, 245:110 (1989).-   24. Bustos M M et al. (1989) Plant Gell 1:839-853-   25. Byrne et al. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 8:3 (1987).-   26. Callis et al., Genes and Develop., 1:1183 (1987).-   27. Campbell and Gowri, Plant Physiol., 92:1 (1990).-   28. Campbell, W. C., ed. Ivermectin and Abamectin, Springer-Verlag,    New York, 1989.-   29. Chee et al. Plant Physiol., 91:1212 (1989).-   30. Chen and Winans (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173: 1139-1144-   31. Christou et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86:7500 (1989).-   32. Christou et al., Biotechnology, 9:957 (1991).-   33. Christou et al., Plant Physiol., 87:671 (1988).-   34. Chui et al. (1996) Curr Biol 6:325-330-   35. Coe et al., In: Corn and Corn Improvement, Sprague et al. (eds.)    pp. 81-258 (1988).-   36. Corpet et al. Nucleic Acids Res., 16:10881 (1988).-   37. Coxson et al., Biotropica, 24:121 (1992).-   38. Crameri et al., Nature Biotech., 15:436 (1997).-   39. Crameri et al., Nature, 391:288 (1998).-   40. Crossway et al., BioTechniques, 4:320 (1986).-   41. Cuozzo et al., Bio/Technology, 6:549 (1988).-   42. Cutler et al., J. Plant Physiol., 135:351 (1989).-   43. Czapla and Lang, J. Econ. Entomol., 83:2480 (1990).-   44. Datta et al., Bio/Technology, 8:736 (1990).-   45. Davies et al., Plant Physiol., 93:588 (1990).-   46. Dayhoff et al., Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Natl.    Biomed. Res. Found., Washington, C. D. (1978).-   47. De Blaere et al., Meth. Enzymol., 143:277 (1987).-   48. De Block et al. Plant Physiol., 91:694 (1989).-   49. De Block et al., EMBO Journal, 6:2513 (1987).-   50. Deblaere et al. Nucl Acids Res 13:4777-4788 (1985)-   51. Della-Cioppa et al. Bio/Technology 5:579-584 (1987)-   52. Della-Cioppa et al., Plant Physiology, 84:965-968 (1987).-   53. Dellaporta et al., in Chromosome Structure and Function, Plenum    Press, 263-282 (1988).-   54. Depicker et al., Plant Cell Reports, 7:63 (1988).-   55, Dunn et al., Can. J. Plant Sci., 61:583 (1981).-   56. Dure et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 12:475 (1989).-   57. Ebinuma et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2117-2121 (2000a)-   58. Ebinuma et al. Selection of Marker-free transgenic plants using    the oncogenes (ipt, rol A, B, C) of Agrobacterium as selectable    markers, In Molecular Biology of Woody Plants. Kluwer Academic    Publishers (2000b)-   59. Eichholtz et al. Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics 13, 67-76    (1987)-   60. Ellis et al., EMBO Journal, 6:3203 (1987).-   61. Elroy-Stein et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 86:6126    (1989).-   62. English et al., Plant Cell, 8:179 (1996).-   63. Erdmann et al., J. Gen. Microbiol., 138:363 (1992).-   64. Erikson et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(4):455-8 (2004)-   65. Everett et al., Bio/Technology, 5:1201 (1987).-   66. Fedoroff N V & Smith D L Plant J 3:273-289 (1993)-   67. Fire A et al Nature 391:806-811 (1998)-   68. Fitzpatrick, Gen. Engineering News, 22.7 (1993).-   69. Fraley et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4803 (1983)-   70. Fromm et al., Bio/Technology, 8:833 (1990).-   71. Fromm et al., Nature (London), 319:791 (1986).-   72. Galbiati et al. Funct. Integr Genozides 2000, 20 1:25-34-   73. Gallie et al. Nucl Acids Res 15:8693-8711 (1987)-   74. Gallie et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 15:3257 (1987).-   75. Gallie et al., The Plant Cell, 1:301 (1989).-   76. Gan et al., Science, 270:1986 (1995).-   77. Gatehouse et al., J. Sci. Food Agric., 35:373 (1984).-   78. Gelfand, eds., PCR Strategies Academic Press, New York (1995).-   79. Gelvin et al., Plant Molecular Biology Manual, (1990).-   80. Gleave et al. Plant Mol. Biol. 40(2):223-35 (1999)-   81. Gordon-Kamm et al., Plant Cell, 2:603 (1990).-   82. Goring et al, PNAS, 88:1770 (1991).-   83. Gruber, et al., Vectors for Plant Transformation, in: Methods in    Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology” in Glich et al., (Eds. pp.    89-119, CRC Press, 1993).-   84. Guerineau et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 262:141 (1991).-   85. Guerrero et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 15:11 (1990).-   86. Gupta et al., PNAS, 90:1629 (1993).-   87. Haines and Higgins (eds.), Nucleic Acid Hybridization, IRL    Press, Oxford, U.K.-   88. Hajdukiewicz et al. Plant Mol Biol 25:989-994 (1994)-   89. Hammock et al., Nature, 344:458 (1990).-   90. Hansen et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7603-7607 (1994)-   91. Hayford et al. Plant Physiol. 86:1216 (1988)-   92. Hemenway et al., EMBO Journal, 7:1273 (1988).-   93. Henikoff & Henikoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:10915    (1989).-   94. Hiei et al. Plant J 6: 271-282 (1994)-   95. Higgins et al., Gene, 73:237 (1988).-   96. Higo et al. (1999) Nucl Acids Res 27(1): 297-300-   97. Hilder et al., Nature, 330:160 (1987).-   98. Hille et al. Plant Mol. Biol. 7:171 (1986)-   99. Hinchee et al. Bio/Technology 6:915 (1988).-   100. Hoekema et al. (1983) Nature 303:179-181-   101. Hoekema, In: The Binary Plant Vector System. Offset-drukkerij    Kanters B. V.; Alblasserdam (1985).-   102. Hood et al. J Bacteriol 168:1291-1301 (1986)-   103. Huang et al., CABIOS, 8:155 (1992).-   104. Ikeda et al., J. Bacteriol., 169:5612 (1987).-   105. Ikuta et al., Biotech., 8:241 (1990).-   106. Ingelbrecht et al., Plant Cell, 1:671 (1989).-   107. Innis and Gelfand, eds., PCR Methods Manual (Academic Press,    New York) (1999).-   108. Innis et al., eds., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and    Applications (Academic Press, New York (1995).-   109. Innis et al., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and    Applications, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (1990).-   110. Ishida Y et al. Nature Biotech 745-750 (1996)-   111. Jefferson et al. EMBO J. 6:3901-3907 (1987)-   112. Jefferson et al. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387-405 (1987)-   113. Jenes B et al. Techniques for Gene Transfer, in: Recombinant    Plants, Vol. 1, Engineering and Utilization, edited by SD Kung and R    Wu, Academic Press, pp. 128-143 (1993)-   114. Jobling et al, Nature, 325:622 (1987).-   115. Johnson et al., PNAS USA, 86:9871 (1989)-   116. Jones et al. Mol. Gen. Genet., 210:86 (1987)-   117. Joshi et al., Nucleic Acid Res., 15:9627 (1987).-   118. Kaasen et al., J. Bacteriol., 174:889 (1992).-   119. Karlin and Altschul, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:2264    (1990).-   120. Karlin and Altschul, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:5873    (1993).-   121. Karsten et al., Botanica Marina, 35:11 (1992).-   122. Katz et al., J. Gen. Microbiol., 129:2703 (1983).-   123. Keller et al., EMBO Journal, 8:1309 (1989).-   124. Keller et al., Genes Dev., 3:1639 (1989).-   125. Klapwijk et al. J. Bacteriol., 141, 128-136 (1980)-   126. Klein et al., Bio/Technology, 6:559 (1988).-   127. Klein et al., Plant Physiol., 91:440 (1988).-   128. Klein et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:4305 (1988).-   129. Knauf, et al., Genetic Analysis of Host Range Expression by    Agrobacterium In: Molecular Genetics of the Bacteria-Plant    Interaction, Puhler, A. ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.-   130. Koncz & Schell Mol Gen Genet. 204:383-396 (1986)-   131. Koprek T et al. Plant J 19(6): 719-726 (1999)-   132. Koster and Leopold, Plant Physiol., 88:829 (1988).-   133. Koziel et al., Biotechnology, 11:194 (1993).-   134. Kunkel et al., Methods in Enzymol., 154:367 (1987).-   135. Kunkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82:488 (1985).-   136. Lam E und Chua N H, J Biol Chem; 266(26):17131-17135 (1991)-   137. Laufs et al., PNAS, 87:7752 (1990).-   138. Lawton et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 7:335 (1987).-   139. Lee and Saier, J. Bacteriol., 153 (1982).-   140. Leffel et al. Biotechniques 23(5):912-8 (1997)-   141. Lescot et al. Nucleic Acids Res 30(1):325-7 (2002)-   142. Levings, Science, 250:942 (1990).-   143. Li et al. Plant Mol Biol 20:1037-1048 (1992)-   144. Lindsey et al., Transgenic Research, 2:3347 (1993).-   145. Liu et al., Plant J. 8, 457-463 (1995)-   146. Lommel et al., Virology, 181:382 (1991).-   147. Loomis et al., J. Expt. Zool., 252:9 (1989).-   148. Lorz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199:178 (1985).-   149. Ma et al., Nature, 334 :631 (1988).-   150. Macejak et al., Nature, 353:90 (1991).-   151. Maki et al., Methods in Plant Molecular Biology &    Biotechnology, Glich et al., 67-88 CRC Press, (1993).-   152. Maniatis T, Fritsch E F, and Sambrook J Molecular Cloning: A    Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor    (NY), (1989)-   153. Mariani et al, Nature, 347:737 (1990).-   154. Matzke et al. (2000) Plant Mol Biol 43:401-415;-   155. McBride et al., PNAS USA, 91:7301 (1994).-   156. McCabe et al., Bio/Technology, 6:923 (1988).-   157. Meinkoth and Wahi, Anal. Biochem., 138:267 (1984).-   158. Messing and Vierra, Gene, 19:259 (1982).-   159. Michael et al., J. Mol. Biol., 26 :585 (1990). (im Text steht:    Michael et al. 1994)-   160. Millar et al. Plant Mol Biol Rep 10:324-414 (1992)-   161. Mogen et al., Plant Cell, 2:1261 (1990).-   162. Moore et al., J. Mol. Biol., 272:336 (1997).-   163. Mozo & Hooykaas Plant Mol. Biol. 16:917-918 (1991)-   164. Mundy and Chua, EMBO J., 7:2279 (1988).-   165. Munroe et al., Gene, 91:151 (1990).-   166. Murakami et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 205:42 (1986).-   167. Murata et al., FEBS Lett., 296:187 (1992).-   168. Murdock et al., Phytochemistry, 29:85 (1990).-   169. Murray et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 17:477 (1989).-   170. Myers and Miller, CABIOS, 4:11 (1988).-   171. Naested H Plant J 18:571-576 (1999)-   172. Napoli et al., Plant Cell, 2:279 (1990).-   173. Needleman and Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol., 48:443-453 (1970).-   174. Nehra et al. Plant J. 5:285-297 (1994)-   175. Niedz et al., Plant Cell Reports, 14:403 (1995).-   176. Odell et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 113:369 (1990).-   177. Odell et al., Nature, 313:810 (1985).-   178. Ohtsuka et al., J. Biol. Chem., 260:2605 (1985)-   179. Olhoft et al. Plant Cell Rep 20: 706-711 (2001)-   180. Ow et al., Science, 234:856 (1986).-   181. Pacciotti et al., Bio/Technology, 3:241 (1985).-   182. Park et al., J. Plant Biol., 38:365 (1985).-   183. Paszkowski et al., EMBO J., 3:2717 (1984).-   184. Pearson and Lipman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85:2444 (1988).-   185. Pearson et al., Meth. Mol. Biol., 24:307 (1994).-   186. Perera R J et al. Plant Mol. Biol. 23(4): 793-799 (1993)-   187. Perlak et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:3324 (1991).-   188. Phillips et al., In Corn & Corn Improvement, 3rd Edition 10    Sprague et al. (Eds, pp. 345-387)(1988).-   189. Phi-Van et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 10:2302 (1990).-   190. Piatkowski et al., Plant Physiol., 94:1682 (1990).-   191. Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199.183 (1985).-   192. Potrykus, Trends Biotech., 7:269 (1989).-   193. Prasher et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 126:1259 (1985).-   194. Proudfoot, Cell, 64:671 (1991).-   195. Reed et al, J. Gen. Microbiol., 130:1 (1984).-   196. Riggs et al., Proc. Natl, Acad. Sci. USA, 83:5602 (1986).-   197. Rossolini et al., Mol. Cell. Probes, 8:91 (1994).-   198. Ruiz, Plant Cell, 10:937 (1998).-   199. Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d    ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.) (1989).-   200. Sanfacon et al., Genes Dev., 5:141 (1991).-   201. Sanford et al., Particulate Science and Technology, 5:27    (1987).-   202. Scheeren-Groot et al. J. Bacteriol 176: 6418-6426 (1994)-   203. Schenborn and Groskreutz Mol Biotechnol 13(1): 29-44 (1999)-   204. Schlaman and Hooykaas Plant J 11:1377-1385 (1997)-   205. Schoffl F et al. (1989) Mol Gen Genetics 217(2-3):246-53-   206. Shagan et al., Plant Physiol., 101:1397 (1993).-   207. Shah et al. Science 233: 478 (1986)-   208. Shapiro, Mobile Genetic Elements, Academic Press, N.Y. (1983).-   209. Shimamoto et al., Nature, 338:274 (1989).-   210. Silhavy T J, Berman M L, and Enquist L W Experiments with Gene    Fusions, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor    (NY), (1984)-   211. Skuzeski et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 15: 65-79 (1990).-   212. Smith et al., Adv. Appl. Math., 2:482 (1981).-   213. Smith et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 224:447 (1990).-   214. Spencer et al., Theor. Appl. Genet, 79:625 (1990). Spencer 1992    Referenz fehlt-   215. Stalker et al., Science, 242:419 (1988).-   216. Staub et al., EMBO J., 12:601 (1993).-   217. Staub et al., Plant Cell, 4:39 (1992).-   218. Steifel et al., The Plant Cell, 2:785 (1990).-   219. Stemmer, Nature, 370:389 (1994).-   220. Stemmer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91:10747 (1994).-   221. Stief et al., Nature, 341:343 (1989).-   222. Stougaard Plant J 3:755-761 (1993)-   223. Sukhapinda et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 8:209 (1987).-   224. Sundaresan et al. Gene Develop 9: 1797-1810 (1995)-   225. Sutcliffe, PNAS USA, 75:3737 (1978).-   226. Svab et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 14:197 (1990)-   227. Svab et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:8526 (1990).-   228. Svab et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:913 (1993).-   229. Tarczynski et al., PNAS USA, 89:2600 (1992).-   230. Thillet et al., J. Biol. Chem., 263:12500 (1988).-   231. Tijssen, Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular    Biology-Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, Elsevier, N.Y.    (1993).-   232. Tomes et al., Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture: Fundamental    Methods, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1995).-   233. Tomic et al., NAR, 12:1656 (1990).-   234. Turner et al., Molecular Biotechnology, 3:225 (1995).-   235. Twell et al., Plant Physiol., 91:1270 (1989).-   236. Ugaki et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 19:371 (1991).-   237. Ulmasov et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 35:417 (1997).-   238. Upender et al., Biotechniques, 18:29 (1995).-   239. van der Krol et al., Plant Cell, 2:291 (1990).-   240. Vanden Elzen et al. Plant Mol Biol. 5:299 (1985)-   241. Vasil et al. Bio/Technology, 10:667-674 (1992)-   242. Vasil et al. Bio/Technology, 11:1153-1158 (1993)-   243. Vasil et al., Mol. Microbiol., 3:371 (1989).-   244. Vasil et al., Plant Physiol., 91:1575 (1989).-   245. Vernon and Bohnert, EMBO J., 11:2077 (1992).-   246. Walker and Gaastra, eds., Techniques in Molecular Biology,    MacMillan Publishing Company, New York (1983).-   247. Wan & Lemaux (1994) Plant Physiol., 104:3748-   248. Wang et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 12:3399 (1992).-   249. Waterman, M. S. Introduction to Computational Biology: Maps,    sequences and genomes. Chapman & Hall. London (1995).-   250. Watrud et al., in Engineered Organisms and the Environment    (1985).-   251. Watson et al. J. Bacteriol 123, 255-264 (1975)-   252. Watson et al. Corn: Chemistry and Technology (1987).-   253. Weeks et al. Plant Physiol 102:1077-1084 (1993)-   254. Weissinger et al., Annual Rev. Genet., 22:421 (1988).-   255. White et al, Nucl Acids Res, 18, 1062 (1990).-   256. Wingender E et al. Nucleic Acids Res 29(1):281-3 (2001)-   257. Wolter et al., EMBO Journal, 11:4685 (1992).-   258. Wyn-Jones and Storey, Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought    Resistance in Plants Paleg et al. (eds.), pp. 171-204 (1981).-   259. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., Plant Cell Physiol., 33:217 (1992).-   260. Zhang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:4504 (1997).-   261. Zukowsky et al., PNAS USA, 80:1101 (1983).

All publications, patents and patent applications are incorporatedherein by reference. While in the foregoing specification this inventionhas been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereofand many details have been set forth for purposes of illustration, itwill be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention issusceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the detailsdescribed herein may be varied considerably without departing from thebasic principles of the invention.

1. An expression cassette for regulating root-preferential orroot-specific expression in plants comprising i) at least onetranscription regulating nucleotide sequence of a plant gene, said plantgene selected from the group of genes described by the GenBankArabidopsis thaliana genome loci At1g66280 and At5g48070, or afunctional equivalent thereof, and functionally linked thereto, ii) atleast one nucleic acid sequence which is heterologous in relation tosaid transcription regulating nucleotide sequence.
 2. The expressioncassette of claim 1, wherein the transcription regulating nucleotidesequence is selected from the group of sequences consisting of i) thesequence described by SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37; ii) afragment of at least 50 consecutive bases of a sequence under i) whichhas substantially the same promoter activity as the correspondingtranscription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO: 1,2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37; iii) a nucleotide sequence havingsubstantial similarity to a transcription regulating nucleotide sequencedescribed by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37; iv) a nucleotidesequence capable of hybridizing to a transcription regulating nucleotidesequence described by SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37, or thecomplement thereof; v) a nucleotide sequence capable of hybridizing to anucleic acid comprising 50 to 200 or more consecutive nucleotides of atranscription regulating nucleotide sequence described by SEQ ID NO: 1,2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37, or the complement thereof; and vi) anucleotide sequence which is the complement or reverse complement of anyof the previously mentioned nucleotide sequences under i) to v).
 3. Theexpression cassette of claim 1, wherein the functional equivalent of thetranscription regulating nucleotide sequence is obtained or obtainablefrom plant genomic DNA from a gene encoding a polypeptide which has atleast 70% amino acid sequence identity to a polypeptide selected fromthe group described by SEQ ID NO: 6 and 39, respectively.
 4. Theexpression cassette of claim 1, wherein expression of the nucleic acidsequence results in expression of a protein, or expression of anantisense RNA, a sense RNA, or a double-stranded RNA.
 5. The expressioncassette of claim 1, wherein expression of the nucleic acid sequenceconfers to the plant an agronomically valuable trait.
 6. A vectorcomprising the expression cassette of claim
 1. 7. A transgenic host cellor non-human organism comprising the expression cassette of claim 1 or avector comprising said expression cassette.
 8. A transgenic plantcomprising the expression cassette of claim 1, or a vector comprisingsaid expression cassette, or a transgenic cell comprising saidexpression cassette or said vector.
 9. A method for producing atransgenic plant cell, comprising transforming a plant cell with theexpression cassette of claim
 1. 10. A method for producing a transgenicplant, comprising transforming a plant cell with the expression cassetteof claim 1, and generating from the plant cell the transgenic plant. 11.A method for identifying and/or isolating a sequence withroot-preferential or root-specific transcription regulating activitycomprising utilizing i) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the amino acidsequence as described by SEQ ID NO: 6 or 39, or a part of at least 15bases thereof; or ii) the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or 38,or a part of at least 15 bases thereof.
 12. The method of claim 11,wherein said identification and/or isolation is realized by polymerasechain reaction, hybridization, or database screening.
 13. A method forproviding a transgenic expression cassette for root-preferential orroot-specific expression comprising the steps of: I. isolating aroot-preferential or root-specific transcription regulating nucleotidesequence utilizing at least one nucleic acid sequence or a part thereofwherein said sequence is encoding a polypeptide described by SEQ ID NO:6 or 39, or a part of at least 15 bases thereof, and II. functionallylinking said root-preferential or root-specific transcription regulatingnucleotide sequence to another nucleotide sequence of interest, which isheterologous in relation to said root-preferential or root-specifictranscription regulating nucleotide sequence.
 14. An expression cassettefor regulating root-preferential or root-specific expression in plantscomprising: i) at least one transcription regulating nucleotidesequence; and ii) at least one nucleic acid sequence which is operablylinked to and heterologous in relation to said transcription regulatingnucleotide sequence; wherein the transcription regulating nucleotidesequence comprises: a) at least one transcription regulating nucleotidesequence of the plant gene encoding a polypeptide comprising the aminoacid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 or 39, b) the nucleotide sequence of SEQID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 34, 35, 36, or 37, c) a nucleotide sequence havingat least 70% identity to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3,4, 34, 35, 36, or 37, or d) a fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 34,35, 367 or 37, wherein the transcription regulating nucleotide sequencehas root-preferential or root-specific expression activity.
 15. Theexpression cassette of claim 14, wherein expression of the nucleic acidsequence results in expression of a protein, or expression of anantisense RNA, a sense RNA, or a double-stranded RNA.
 16. The expressioncassette of claim 14, wherein expression of the nucleic acid sequenceconfers to the plant an agronomically valuable trait.
 17. A vectorcomprising the expression cassette of claim
 14. 18. A transgenic hostcell or non-human organism comprising the expression cassette of claim14 or a vector comprising said expression cassette.
 19. A transgenicplant comprising the expression cassette of claim 14, or a vectorcomprising said expression cassette, or a transgenic cell comprisingsaid expression cassette or said vector.
 20. A method for producing atransgenic plant or plant cell, comprising transforming a plant cellwith the expression cassette of claim 14.